Home Community

precision photoemission assessment.
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 31, 2010, 02:02:17 AM
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
News: trade your components on this new board: "Components trade"

Advertisements
No New Posts
Today at 01:39:33 AM
in
Advertisements
by google

+  Electronics-Lab.com Community
|-+  Electronics Forums
| |-+  Electronic Projects Design/Ideas (Moderator: Dazza)
| | |-+  precision photoemission assessment.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Print
Author Topic: precision photoemission assessment.  (Read 2125 times)
chaosdrone
Jr. Member
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 54


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: December 20, 2009, 08:31:05 PM »

yeah i have been reading relentlessly lately about practical evaluation of such theories like EMT, percolation, maxwell, pal model, etc... and all what i have found was an unbelievable lack in generality for such laws being very case-dependant with paradoxical behaviours for many composite cases  Shocked

beside the crystals should induce photoemission already in the polymer phase which puts in quite of a predicable situation having to develop my unique theoretical interpretation to whatever (supposedly very accurate) data i get.  Embarrassed
Logged


chaosdrone
Jr. Member
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 54


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2009, 07:42:10 PM »

Well ,,apart from any quantum or coupling efficiency .... what if we assumed to have an ejected photo-electron inside a polymer ... what circuit should be most efficacious in sensing such freed electrons and what would be the minimal sensitivity of the detection (the least number of ejected electrons that could be detected)??
Logged

chaosdrone
Jr. Member
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 54


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2009, 08:08:47 PM »

i was just reading this .. http://pdfserv.maxim-ic.com/en/an/AN2236.pdf


sounding like if i succeeded in turning my very minuscule current into voltage then i'd be able to simulate that PIN diode in the circuit .. and hence gain such precision .. right?


but how Cheesy ??
Logged

Alex Tsekenis
Sr. Member
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 335



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2009, 10:39:06 AM »

You do not have current in your circuit as current flow would be a number of charged particles (electrons here) passing through a section of your material and having a common net direction.

As I understand it, your electrons are bound in the material but not to a specific atom, much like a conductor.

My best bet with my very limited knowledge in this field would be to measure the conductivity or a similar quantity of your material. The more 'free' electrons, the higher the conductivity.

The circuit you linked is kind of the electronic equivalent of your polymer. Unless you tell me that this is the only solution I cant see how you can use this circuit with its current component values.

How about sending me some of your photoelectric goo  Tongue and I run some tests at uni or home? Maybe putting it on a glass substrate with two electrodes on each end.
Logged

Regards,
Alex

Disclaimer: All content of my posts is intended for educational use only. Although the information is given in good faith, if you or any third party attempts to implement any content from my posts or posts related to mine in any way, you agree that you do so by accepting full responsibility for your actions. I will not be held liable in any way for any consequences or damage, direct or indirect, caused by your actions.

chaosdrone
Jr. Member
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 54


View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: December 24, 2009, 02:14:03 PM »

 Cheesy well i first got to theorize the whole thing from synthesis to advanced testing before i get granted access to the lab inwhich i'll be able to make that goo  Embarrassed
Logged

chaosdrone
Jr. Member
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 54


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: December 24, 2009, 02:14:48 PM »

who would hate a test for free anyway  Wink
Logged

Alex Tsekenis
Sr. Member
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 335



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 25, 2009, 06:42:33 PM »

I hate this about academic environments. Anyway, you could claim that a preliminary goo must be produced to verify the feasibility of a method to measure the conductivity of the goo.
Logged

Regards,
Alex

Disclaimer: All content of my posts is intended for educational use only. Although the information is given in good faith, if you or any third party attempts to implement any content from my posts or posts related to mine in any way, you agree that you do so by accepting full responsibility for your actions. I will not be held liable in any way for any consequences or damage, direct or indirect, caused by your actions.

chaosdrone
Jr. Member
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 54


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: December 26, 2009, 08:00:35 AM »

 Embarrassed yeah but even the low accuracy synthesis of a preliminary goo would require a specialized polymers lab, you know .. goo can't be prepared anywhere but in goo-labs  Sad
Logged

Alex Tsekenis
Sr. Member
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 335



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 26, 2009, 10:28:18 AM »

Your toilet fits the description Tongue

On a different note, I don't think anyone here can readily help you with the theory behind your goo without pre-reading/research. If you can synth some goo, we can help you develop a conductivity meter.
Logged

Regards,
Alex

Disclaimer: All content of my posts is intended for educational use only. Although the information is given in good faith, if you or any third party attempts to implement any content from my posts or posts related to mine in any way, you agree that you do so by accepting full responsibility for your actions. I will not be held liable in any way for any consequences or damage, direct or indirect, caused by your actions.

chaosdrone
Jr. Member
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 54


View Profile Email
« Reply #23 on: December 27, 2009, 12:01:34 PM »

 Grin lol

well, someone advised me with measuring the shot-noise phenomenon, by the use of a current integrator.

and this idea is so appealing to me, sounds like it takes down the measurement process to the edge.
have found much circuit schematics for this though, yet i wonder which particular design should i adopt, for a simple precision current integrator?  Roll Eyes
Logged

Alex Tsekenis
Sr. Member
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 335



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: December 27, 2009, 05:03:22 PM »

You will have free electrons but you will not have current. You will need to accelerate them in an electrostatic field. The current integrator will integrate the tiny
current over time, thus measuring charge. If you know the time, you can work out the number of electrons freed.

The current integrator will probably take the form of an op-amp with a capacitor in the negative feedback path and a grounded non-inverting input. Your output will be -(1/C) x integral of (Iin) dt [Volts].

But you need to get those electrons moving.
Logged

Regards,
Alex

Disclaimer: All content of my posts is intended for educational use only. Although the information is given in good faith, if you or any third party attempts to implement any content from my posts or posts related to mine in any way, you agree that you do so by accepting full responsibility for your actions. I will not be held liable in any way for any consequences or damage, direct or indirect, caused by your actions.

chaosdrone
Jr. Member
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 54


View Profile Email
« Reply #25 on: December 28, 2009, 10:56:52 PM »

yeah five volts from a switching PS would do, across a highly resistive assembly  Wink , i need to choose some accurate op-amp model though  Undecided
Logged

Alex Tsekenis
Sr. Member
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 335



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: December 29, 2009, 05:26:42 AM »

Here is a hard question:

What magnitude of current is expected under 5 Volts across your goo?
Logged

Regards,
Alex

Disclaimer: All content of my posts is intended for educational use only. Although the information is given in good faith, if you or any third party attempts to implement any content from my posts or posts related to mine in any way, you agree that you do so by accepting full responsibility for your actions. I will not be held liable in any way for any consequences or damage, direct or indirect, caused by your actions.

chaosdrone
Jr. Member
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 54


View Profile Email
« Reply #27 on: December 30, 2009, 11:58:46 PM »

I answer this  Roll Eyes

well the pristine PANI should exhibit a conductivity in the magnitude around 10^8 .. well but that's not all .. i'll further need to optimize the suspended phase volume fraction and the physical dimensions of the composite block in order to optimize the current magnitude.. .. I am intending to start calculating that briefly.  Lips Sealed
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


 

 

Search Site | Advertising | Profile | Add your link here | Contact Us | LED Displays | Wholesale iPhone Parts
Elektrotekno.com | Free Schematics Search Engine | Electronic Kits | Electronics Discount Codes | Wholesale electronics


  Electronics-lab.com - 2002-2010
Any logo, trademark and project represented here are property of their owner