Jump to content
Electronics-Lab.com Community

indulis

Members
  • Posts

    488
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by indulis

  1. A 20db/decade roll-off of an opamp approaches the limitation of the device. You extend the bandwidth of an opamp by reducing gain.


    KevinIV, where do you get this stuff ... do you just make it up as you go along??? Get a good electronics book, read it, study it and get a good grasp of the fundamentals.

    You "claim" you "... extend the bandwidth of an opamp by reducing gain". Now ponder the difference between extending the "usable bandwidth" of your circuit by reducing the gain and the op-amps actual bandwidth. I know I shouldn't ask, but will... do you think you have changed the opamps bandwith from what it was with reduced gain??
  2. Does anybody know about IC's. I've seen many electronics components, but haven't researched their designs. How complicated can they be?


    Sorry, but I have to ask.... KevinIV, do you have any formal electronics schooling? Do you work in the industry or is your intrest as a hobby?

    Google "SoC" (system on a chip) that is a good example as to "how complicated they can be".
  3. in a switch the current is zero when switch is open or voltage is zero when switch is closed...


    Only in a ZCS or ZVS supply... the other topologies don't have that luxury.

    In terms of SMPS, the number one thing to get a good understanding of is the concept of Pulse Width Modulation (PWM)... a concept you might want to include in the "Technical Articles" that pertain to DC-DC's on your website.

    With a solid basic supply design, things like switching losses, parasitic resistance & inductance are really considered higher order effects.

    Then you have stability issues by picking the wrong output cap and inductor values.


    Those two components are basic to any SMPS design... the design dictates their value, you don't just arbitrarily "pick" them... be it a simple buck converter, or a more complicated isolated topology. Certainly, good layout practices should be followed to minimize the "loop areas" in the feedback and minimize any proximity effects. As for the "high current paths", short and fat is always preferred.
  4. MOSFETS tend to have a high VGS requirement.


    Not true... I use small MOSFET's (Vishay) that have a  Vgs of 1.2V... I wouldn't consider that high.


    So there isn't really much difference between using a MOSFET and a bipolar transistor.


    No... re-read and UNDERSTAND what Hero999 just said!!!!!


    That is what I expected...


    If you are really serious when you say that,  I'd recommend you get yourself a good book on semiconductor physics read that, then read-up on BJT's, JFET's and MOSFET's... after you have done that, let us know if you still think there isn't really much difference.
  5. The power density of switchers is quite high... for example my (work) bench supplies are Xantrex a XHR 100- 10 (100V @ 10A) and a XHR 40 25 (40V @ 25A). Both are 1 KW supplies and measure ~3"x8.5"x16". In a linear supply of the same power, the transformer would probably bigger than that by itself. Although, one problem that I have run into on occasion is powering a SMPS with a SMPS... nasty things can start to happen, particularly if some noise gets in to the sense lines.

  6. This is a "second order" circuit. You took a bode plot over a frequency range. Things are going to change over frequency. Have you solved the differential equation for this circuit to find the poles and zeros? It's also what is called a "passive circuit"... so, unless you hit a resonant frequency (as AG pointed out) in your sweep, this thing can only attenuate.

  7. That transistor has absolutely nothing to do with the biasing of the MOSFET!!! If you take it out of the circuit, the MOSFET is still "biased" on. It's sole purpose is to turn the MOSFET off. You could run the MOSFET directly from the 555... the problem is that the 555 doesn't have the current driving capability to switch it fast. Anytime you have a MOSFET switching a high current load, you have to switch it fast to minimize "switching losses"... that's the I

  8. Would using a push-pull emitter follower configuration be any better?


    YES!!!

    Put the gate resistor in the collector of the NPN not to "over-drive" the MOSFET and the PNP will be able to turn it off faster.

    Most of our designs have PWM's capable of 1 or 2 amp's and if they don't, a driver is used.
  9. With the values shown, it could switch at up to ~48KHz... your not going to drive that MOSFET with a 555 directly at that frequency.  A 555 can only sink ~200mA whereas the 2N2222 is good for 1A.

    Unfortunately, the turn on will be slower due to the 330R.


    Yes, exactly what I said in my original reply.

  10. The 2N2222 is there to turn the MOSFET off. The 2N3055 gain is low. The 330 ohm will "slow down" the MOSFET turn-on. Why 4 MOSFETS in parallel? The IRF510 is a 100V 5.6A device with an Rds on of .54 ohms.

    You will need a snubber across the primary winding or MOSFET (maybe both). You show a 3A source... what do you think 4 MOSFET's will do for you besides lower "Rds on"? Better devices are out there.

×
  • Create New...