MP Posted March 7, 2004 Report Share Posted March 7, 2004 They are test standards of the parameters used by the chip manufacturer. Your application might very well be different. If your application falls within the generic specs, then sure. If you are pushing the edge, then you have to look closer. You can still achieve the manufacturer's specs if you use proper designing techniques.For example, when a data sheet states that the device will work between -40C and +150C, they usually list a min max and typ to show their results. What they might not tell you is that 50% dropped out at +142C, and thus they can still compete with their competitors and advertise the +150C top end tolerance for temperature. But if you are manufacturing this device to be sent to the equator, you will want to provide more testing before you package it. This would be considered an extreme for any company. If you are using the device in your lab, you are pretty safe with the min tolerances given in the data sheet.So, in answer to your question, yes, you can rely on the specs. If your application is extreme, you might have to add something to the circuit to continue to achieve this.MP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jandro Posted March 10, 2004 Report Share Posted March 10, 2004 ???Hi MP,What would I have to do to control the voltage output of the LM317 VPS using a 4-20mA signal in place of the potentiometer?I am trying to build a variable power supply I can "talk to" with a 4-20mA loop controller.Thanks for your help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP Posted March 11, 2004 Report Share Posted March 11, 2004 Hi Jandro,I have never seen anyone use this application. Perhaps the simplest way to do it would be to have the current change the intensity of light which activates a light sensitive resistor where the light sensitive resistor takes the place of the pot. You could make your own custom package if needed.I am sure there are many other ways to do it as well.MP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Jandro,Did you find a solution?MP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted June 29, 2004 Report Share Posted June 29, 2004 Hello, i was wondering if it was possible to use a 450 ma 25 volt transformer on this lm317 power supply Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP Posted June 29, 2004 Report Share Posted June 29, 2004 Hi Jeff,You should have no problems with this transformer. MP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted June 29, 2004 Report Share Posted June 29, 2004 I tried it with this and i have a two amp fuse on one side of the input and it is blowing??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP Posted June 30, 2004 Report Share Posted June 30, 2004 Have you double checked the pin out of this regulator? It is different than the others. The pin out does not match the schematic symbol.MP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted June 30, 2004 Report Share Posted June 30, 2004 I bought the lm317t from radio shack. It shows on the package that 2 is the out or the middle pin. As the picture goes I think with the pins pointing down looking at the thing with the heat sink part laying on the table pin 3 is on the left and then pin 2 is center and pin one is right. Here is the schematic of my power supply, only I have a 25 v 450 ma transformer. I had it working for a minute and put a meter on the output and the fuse blew. I tried again after checking it and it blew as soon as i turned it on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP Posted July 1, 2004 Report Share Posted July 1, 2004 Jeff, with the heat sink tab on the table and pins down, your pin assignment is left to right. This should correct the problem.MP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted July 4, 2004 Report Share Posted July 4, 2004 Thanks for the help. The package for the lm317 is not clear as to which side is down. I got it working and am using it for a 4-H Fair as a demonstrations. Thanks for all the help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP Posted July 4, 2004 Report Share Posted July 4, 2004 Jeff, glad to see you got it working. You are right, there is really nothing on this device which indicates the pins are numbered from which end. You will want to memorize this since it is standard on all devices with this package type. This will surely come in handy on another project in the future. Nice looking project!MP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emiliano86 Posted September 15, 2004 Report Share Posted September 15, 2004 Pinky...i am planing to build this project, a regulated PSU with the LM317, i was searching on the net and i found a very similar regualtor the same voltage butinstead of 1.5 A, it can manage 3 A.......but bell I have some questions......for the LM317 PSU:1 - if Iwant a 30VDC at maximun output, with 1.5A (very demandin), which is the transformer I need, because I have a 12 - 12 V 75VA?, or I have to use a 30 V one?...2 - I am very intereting on the idea that you told at the beginig of the forum, that we can use a 12+12 transformer and a circuit to conect the 24V when i need more than 12.....but I can't find a circuit.... or something symilar, to have an idea.....Have you got a circuit or soemthing like that, or a croquis...???3 - another question I have is about the ripple.....how can I improve the filter section in the ciruit to make better the ripple rejection?.....is a good idea use a choke input filter?......please help me...4 - may be the LM317 could be replaced by the lm350K.......Thank you very much!!!....and sorry for my bad english....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP Posted September 16, 2004 Report Share Posted September 16, 2004 Some notes on ripple:If you have power supply ripple getting past the regulator, you should increase the "input" side cap, not the output side.The output side of a reg should already be a very low impedance, and adding caps to it beyond that needed to suppress HF noise should not be necessary, and can actually drive a reg into oscillation under some conditions.On the input side, you must simply ensure that at the max load current, the bottoms of the AC ripple are above the min dropout voltage of the regulator. More cap = less ripple, until you get above the dropout voltage.On this regulator, you can also use a bypass cap on the adjustment ternminal and get excellent ripple rejection. Try this if you find you still have a problem after using a good sized bypass cap on the input pin.In regards to the voltage needed, I think you need a minimum of 3 volts more "in" than what you are trying to get "out" of it. You can check the data sheet to verify. This refers to the voltage after rectification.MP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven Posted September 16, 2004 Report Share Posted September 16, 2004 ;)i hope this helps in any ideas or deisgn updates Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven Posted September 16, 2004 Report Share Posted September 16, 2004 ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audioguru Posted September 16, 2004 Report Share Posted September 16, 2004 Hi Guys, some info: ;DThe LM317 is guaranteed to have an output current of 1.5A with 15V or less across it. In order to protect itself from second breakdown, it cuts back on its output current with more than 15V across it. With a high input voltage and low output voltage, it is guaranteed to supply only 150mA.The 3A LM350 cuts back its output current with only 10V or more across it.These regulators shut-down when they get too hot. The TO-220 "T" package has lousy thermal conduction to its heatsink, the TO-3 "K" package is much better.The ripple rejection is typically (no guarantee) 65dB, which is one/two-thousandth. With a 10uF cap on the adjustment terminal to ground, the ripple rejection is typically 80dB, which is one/ten-thousandth. With the cap, the ripple rejection is guaranteed to be 66dB, which is one/two-thousandth. Pretty darn good.If you don't use a "star" separate-ground-wires wiring technique, its excellent voltage regulation and ripple rejection are ruined, due to the voltage drop across a common ground wire at high output current. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ante Posted September 16, 2004 Report Share Posted September 16, 2004 Audioguru,I agree the TO3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audioguru Posted September 16, 2004 Report Share Posted September 16, 2004 I agree Ante,But with the bypass transistor you lose short-circuit protection, unless you add an additional transistor, or let the LM317 get hot and shut-down itself and the bypass transistor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ante Posted September 16, 2004 Report Share Posted September 16, 2004 Yes, another transistor and a current sense resistor and it works. It will still be much cheaper. Another possibility is to add a fuse or a circuit breaker, it requires manually reset but it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audioguru Posted September 16, 2004 Report Share Posted September 16, 2004 Hi Ante,Why do we talk about making things cheap? We sound like baby chickens! We aren't mass producing these things. Let's make it good.There is a guy who is selling "the ultimate" audio amplifier for only $3,300US. Inside, it has only 2 National Semi's power amp ICs. You know how cheap those ICs are. Just think about how much profit that guy is making! The magazine that reviewed it said that it sounded harsh at first, then mellowed after a 6 month break-in period. The first one that the magazine tested blew-up! Then its replacement blew-up too! The designer had to take over there a 3rd amp and a replacement power supply (it was separate). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP Posted September 17, 2004 Report Share Posted September 17, 2004 To dispell any myths, I use the LM317 a lot. I am refering to the TO-220 package. I have not had problems overcoming ripple or heat. Only in extreme designs would you even need a heat sink. If you are having problems with this regulator in a design, look at the data sheet and see if you have the wrong application. Next look at how you have designed the board. Most problems I have seen from others with this regulator were actually due to crappy design or layout. This regulator has a good history and is used in many consumer products. I would never purchase a more expensive package from fear of these things listed. It is a total waste of money. Why build things cheap if you are not a manufacturer? Because what you do not spend in parts can buy a lot of beer and pizza!MP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audioguru Posted September 17, 2004 Report Share Posted September 17, 2004 I use the LM317 a lot. I am refering to the TO-220 package. I have not had problems overcoming ripple or heat. Only in extreme designs would you even need a heat sink, ... beer and pizza!MPNo heatsink?Oh yeah?Let's make a simple calculation without using extremes:1) The LM317 is rated for 1.5A, but let's choose only 1A.2) It is spec'd with a minimum of 3V across it, but let's choose a reasonable 5V.3) Some parts of this planet reach 40 degrees C, but let's choose only 25 degrees C.4) The TO-220 "T" package has a Thermal Resistance for Junction-to-Ambient of 50 degrees C per Watt.Its Max Allowable Temp is only 125 degrees C, but this non-extreme sample's junction will try to be at 275 degrees C! It will shut-down very quickly.Try it with only 1/2A, and it will also shut-down. It needs a heatsink. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ante Posted September 17, 2004 Report Share Posted September 17, 2004 I can only speak from my own experience but often I use the LM317 for small things that uses in the range of 10 to 150mA. And if planning the circuit well, a heatsink is overkill. I mean I don Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audioguru Posted September 17, 2004 Report Share Posted September 17, 2004 Hi Ante,For years I have been using the low-dropout LM2931 for all my 9V alkaline and 7.2V Ni-Cad battery low current projects. It sqeezes all the life out of the battery. The 7805 and LM317 get into trouble when the battery is stll new and their idle current is 10 times or more what my circuits draw. The LM2931 has a very low idle current and has all the protection (and more) of the others. I use the small TO-92 size. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.