Jump to content
Electronics-Lab.com Community

Another INVERTER we can talk about..


Guest Kasamiko

Recommended Posts

sasi,

Well the high point can be 13.75V without losing any water and the low point depends on how long you want your battery to live. Best tip here is the manufacturers recommendations for maximum discharge (minimum voltage). An alternative is to trickle at 13.75V and never shut it down completely.



Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images


Hi MP,
Math? But I can't find my old slide-rule!
I'm glad that you agree that Sasi's relay turns-off his circuit, because my new-fangled calculator tells me that a 150A/hr car battery will power the maximum leakage current (25uA each at 55V) of the six MOSFETs for more than 116 years!

Maybe Sasi needs backup only for the short time for his hard-drive to park, and uses just a string of 4A/hr D-cell Ni-Cads. They will power that "parasitic" leakage for more than 3 years!

I think that the little solar-cell (a real one, not just a label) on my calculator can supply the 150uA of leakage current. ;D

Hi Sasi,
Your PCB layouts are very nice. You should post a complete project.


Time for you to get a new slide rule. If environmental and meteorological equipment was built upon the same assumptions, the industry would be a mess. I never disagreed that the relay would turn off his power. He still has resistance to ground. If you look at the components as resistors, and note that you have six in parallel with only looking at the transistors, you can use thevinen's theorem and see that you have enough parasitic draw to draw down the battery after sitting for some time. Good design practise always isolates the battery on equipment when it is not in use. This is a standard.
I only metioned it as a courtesy to sasi, since he could use a DPDT relay and take care of this also. Quite frankly, if you guys want to ignore good design practice, it does not bother me a bit. Just don't deny that it is a better design to isolate the battery from the electronics when it is not in use....and at the cost of only one section of the relay!
..and since I am on the subject of design, the circuit could use a method of charging the battery. The availability is there but not used. There should be a step down from the mains and a regulator to keep the battery up when the mains are giving the available power. Even with no draw, the battery will not stay up if not used for long periods. It will need to be charged. This is just a start. This circuit, if used only for emergency back-up, will also need a way to put a load on the battery once in a while and then charge it. An idle battery will not last long. I do not see much long term usefulness for this circuit "as is". Perhaps as a project, it could be considered a building block for something more involved.

MP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most common UPS:s where I work just have trickle charge at 27.6Volts and these batterys (Dual Panasonic 12V 14Ah) is changed every five years. When measuring voltage and voltage under load (40 A for 15s) on these recycles only 5 out of 50 show any signs of degradation. However there is a charging method called reverse pulse charge that can be used if one considers idling a threat to the battery. Sometimes a high current pulse is used, once every hour (or at any suitable interval) a high current pulse is pushed through the battery causing the voltage to raise and stir the electrolyte. The length of this pulse can vary as well as the strength. The number one reason for batterys to lose there capacity is sulphating and one cause for this is the separation of the acid in the electrolyte. This means that on the bottom of the cells the gravity of the electrolyte can be 1.28 and on the surface 1.22. The sulphating starts at the bottom of the cells and eventually causes shorting of the plates. This will not happen if you can stir the electrolyte from time to time. On some bigger batterys they are even pumping air through plastic pipes that discharges at the bottom of the cells during charging. This is like the pumping of air in a fishtank only it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Sasi,
On your latest circuit, pin 7 of the 324 appears to always be high, and therefore doesn't do anything, just like in the original circuit. I think that pin 6 is missing a voltage reference which would allow pin 7 to go high only when the voltage on pin 5 is higher than the reference. Then the relay would activate and the LED would turn on when the battery voltage is too high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another inverter?
Wait 'til you see the "Class-D" one that I'm working on. Sine-wave output with very high efficiency (runs cool).
When it's shut-down, it will be protected from the environment and BS by keeping it indoors, and covering its "sensitive" bits in case you spill your drink in it or other disasters.
I was going to use the National Semi. one, but it's being discontinued next year, and many people on another forum had theirs blow-up! They were even worried about dropping the IC (that's "OOps" dropping, not voltage dropping). ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi NVD,
Welcome to our forum.
The cheap and simple square-wave output inverters use a heavy relay to change-over the power source when the mains power fails. They must detect the failure and move those heavy contacts. Of course the power will be disconnected for some time and your computer might reset.

Your computer and some other electronic devices might not operate with a square-wave power source anyway since their power supply might rely on the higher peak voltage of a sine-wave power source.
A square-wave inverter is fine for lights and some power tools. Some people reported that they power international TVs fine because those TVs run on nearly any voltage.

Computers usually use an Uninterruptable Power Source (UPS) for backup power. They usually contain a sine-wave output inverter that is running and powering the computer all the time. The only thing they use mains for is to charge their battery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Alun,
Your idea might work if the transformer doesn't have a load and you operate the Mosfets in class-C so they don't load-down the tuned circuit much. If you time the class-C pulses correctly at zero crossings, you might even get mega-volts out of the thingy!
You would probably need enormous caps to tune a big transformer to the mains frequency.

How do those very expensive tuned transformers in UPS's work?
They even regulate the output voltage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hi Alun,
Your idea might work if the transformer doesn't have a load and you operate the Mosfets in class-C so they don't load-down the tuned circuit much.


Yes, the duty cycle needs to be a bit lower than 50% so both transistors aren't on at the same time at any given point.


If you time the class-C pulses correctly at zero crossings, you might even get mega-volts out of the thingy!


I doubt it because this is parallel resonance and you get current magnification not voltage.

You would probably need enormous caps to tune a big transformer to the mains frequency.

Well they would only need to be big enough to carry the off load current. You can also buy pretty big capacitors for power factor correction and audio crosover networks.

An over-sized primary coil and core may be of some benefit too because loading of the secondary will reduce the Q and thus the quality of the sinewave. This doesn't really matter too much as bigger appliances are far less likely to effected by the unusual waveform anyway.

The capacitors will also reduce the off load current and oncrease the efficiency significantly because the power factor will be a lot higher and it will be easier on the transistors too because the capacitors will absorb the back EMF and send it back to the coil.


How do those very expensive tuned transformers in UPS's work?
They even regulate the output voltage.


I don't know, they probably use capacitors in a similar way to my circuit and may be some kind of active feedback device to regulate the output.

I'm planning to do some experiments, I'll start of with a single transistor rather than jumping in at the deep end with the push-pull driver.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Alun,
You must keep the Q high on a tuned transformer for it to continue to ring at the reonant frequency and convert a square-wave to a sine-wave. Therefore a load ruins it.
I was thinking of hitting the tuned circuit with a brief pulse of the proper direction at zero crossings and the voltage will build to infinity without a load.

There is a lot of discussion on the web about the pros and cons of ferroresonant transformers also called a CVT (constant voltage transformer). They convert a 15% change in voltage at the primary to a 3% change at the output. They are said to hum badly, heat-up with a low input voltage and a high one and slowly reduce their output when the input is cutoff (blowing-up SMPS).
You could probably use one with a push-pull inverter drive and get a reasonable sine-wave out.

post-1706-14279142155982_thumb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
  • Create New...