Electronics-Lab.com Community

# Very long RC time contant!

## Recommended Posts

The RC time constant must be long enough with repect to the signal time to cleanly pass the signal through the capacitor.

Is this statement true or false?

I wanted to revisit this topic because I was sharply denounced last time. Now, I know the truth. Any takers?

##### Share on other sites

The RC time constant must be long enough with repect to the signal time to cleanly pass the signal through the capacitor.

Is this statement true or false?

I wanted to revisit this topic because I was sharply denounced last time. Now, I know the truth. Any takers?

You are probably talking about an audio coupling capacitor.
The time constant of the capacitor with the impedance of the input of the next stage is usually calculated to form a highpass filter, so at the cutoff frequency the signal begins to be impeded and is not cleanly passed.
##### Share on other sites

The triangle is the trick. It's not seen using a sinewave. The low frequency triangle allows the other side of the capacitor to go to bias too quickly. The instantaneous voltage of the input charges the capacitor like DC.

##### Share on other sites

It's not seen using a sinewave.

Of course a sinewave or any other waveshape is affected by the time constant of a coupling capacitor.
At the frequency where the reactance of the capacitor equals the impedance of its load, the circuit's output level is down 3dB which is a loss of -0.707.
##### Share on other sites

I don't think you meant equal impedance, that would be half the voltage. Your thinking resonant frequency.

##### Share on other sites

I don't think you meant equal impedance, that would be half the voltage. Your thinking resonant frequency.

That is not true. A capacitor has phase-shift that causes the response to be 0.707 instead of half the voltage. Half the voltage is created by two equal resistors that don't have phase-shift.
Look at RC filters in Google.
##### Share on other sites

Audioguru, should I just go back to my lab and learn to measure resistance with an ohmeter all over again. Maybe I could be a cook for the electronics guys at work.

Just joking Kevin

##### Share on other sites

You could cook up a few circuits from the applications that are shown on datasheets.

##### Share on other sites

What is funny, if you start a sinewave on an RC just up to 90 degree and stop, the capacitor still gets voltage, rather than remaining at zero. It's not going to wait until the input starts to go down, because it may not go down.

I plotted RC phase shift on paper one time using a triangle. I set the resistor equal to the capacitive reactance. Let's say they are both 100 ohms. If the input is 20Vpp, then capacitors about 14Vpp and the resistors about 6Vpp. When the input reaches +10V, the resistor must be at +3V and the capacitor at +7V. The resistor can't be at +4V because it doesn't go that high. It could be +2V, that would put the capacitor at +8V, but the capacitor doesn't go that high. The resistor could be +2V and the capacitor +7V, But that is only +9V total.

Since the inputs at +10V, the resistors at +3V, and the capacitor is at +7V, don't they all appear to be in phase?

But everywhere else, besides the peak, like in this example, the different phases and voltages seem plausable.
##### Share on other sites

• 2 weeks later...

At what frequency did you calculate the capacitive reactance? You are aware that triangular waves are a bunch of sine waves at different harmonic frequencies and amplitudes summed together, right (a.k.a. Fourier Analysis)? Phase shift only pertains to voltage in relation to current or vise versa. Voltage or current by themselves don't have any phase shift.

Recall "ELI the ICE man" voltage (E) leads current (I)in a Inductor (L) and Current (I) leads Voltage (E) in a capacitor © by 90 degrees. Or if you preffer, current (I) lags voltage (E) in an inductor (L)... etc.

##### Share on other sites

• 4 weeks later...

Audioguru, that phase thing has nothing to do with impedance and voltage drop. I have not been building circuits for a long time, so it took me a few to figure it out. You take the 2pi out of the reactance equation to get the voltage divider.

##### Share on other sites

Of course a voltage divider made with a resistor in series with a capacitor to ground have a phase shift.  At the frequency that the reactance of the capacitor is the same as the resistor's value, the level is 0.707 times, not half. It is called a lowpass filter. 0.707 times is 3dB down.

##### Share on other sites

Wow, not once have I ever read anything about how you arrived at that. If I had to include phase into the voltage divider, I would be stuck. And so would my books author. Just remove 2pi from the reactance equation. It works perfect and with no surprise. And you know, discovering this a bit late in life doesn't bother me one bit. That equation is about as useless as alpha, IIR, and cycles per second.

##### Share on other sites

A diagram of response vs phase-shift can be shown with phasors, but I couldn't find one.
All tutorials show that the response of an RC lowpass filter is down 3dB (times 0.707) at the cutoff frequency where the reactance of the capacitor equals the resistance of the resistor:

##### Share on other sites

Yes, I've seen the pictures. It's the only way I know how to determine phase shift. That equation may as well not be tailored to the simple circuits I build. Maybe you take the 2pi out there too.

## Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.