Kerrowman Posted December 16, 2020 Report Share Posted December 16, 2020 Hi there, I would like some help with finding an effective way to detect resonance in an electrolysis setup that functions like an LC circuit. Let me lay out the full context and details. (The pics are not showing in the post in this order.) Pic 1 shows the flow chart for the setup that is built and based on an auto-tuning circuit designed by a friend, who is no longer working in this area, and is designed to help explore ways to improve the efficiency of Hydrogen production. At this stage, the two gases are not separated but that doesn't affect the way the pulsed supply affects the electrolysis reaction. The small test cell uses pure water and so operates like a capacitor and, with a choke either side, can be modelled like an LC tank circuit. Part of the aim is to cause dielectric breakdown of the pure water to split it at high voltage but very low current. Pic 2 shows part of the circuit drawing that is related to detecting when resonance occurs in the cell and two chokes and which is the focus of my query. Pic 3 shows this modelled using LTSpice and that, when using typical values for L and C and a sine wave input, a resonant frequency occurs at 2.2996kHz. Pic 4 this shows what happens in the LC circuit when using a square wave input that is actually used for the electrolysis. Unlike when using a sine wave, at resonance, there does not seem to be a minimum impedance point that could be used to feed to a comparator. Pic 5 shows the LC circuit modelled with the 'Resonance Detector' op-amp setup. The various traces are the square wave input (Green), inputs to the op-amp D, E (Red, Blue) that come from across the cell (Capacitor C1) and output F (Cyan) from the op-amp. Now let me explain what happens in practice. The PLL circuit works fine (some of the traces are shown in Pic 1) on manual and where the frequency output is determined by the pot at the top right. However, on Auto, where the ramp generator results in a range of frequencies (0-20kHz) in the PLL's VCO, no output comes from the PLL chip (Pin 4). At the moment I am thinking that the PLL output may only appear in Auto mode when a resonance lock is made, but to fully understand how that lock arises I have been examining exactly what happens at resonance and how the circuit will detect it and feed a signal into Pin 14 of the PLL. From my modelling with LTSpice, I can't see any particular feature at resonance across the capacitor (cell) that could be useful to tell the op-amp that resonance is taking place, especially with a square wave input. At least with a sine wave, I could have used the voltage across the whole circuit (L-C-L) to give me a definitive low value. So to summarise my query, can I detect resonance with the current setup and pick off points or will some modest adjustment make that possible? Alternatively, perhaps I need to build some additional circuitry to enable this? Ideas welcomed. Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryA Posted December 17, 2020 Report Share Posted December 17, 2020 I believe the only way one may detect resonance is with something that has a memory be it human or microcomputer. One needs to know that it is passing resonance peak and then backup. A microcomputer could store values and keep comparing the values until the current value is less then previous values. There are current detectors that encircle one lead that maybe less intrusive than a direct connection to the capacitor if you can find one that is sensitive enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerrowman Posted December 17, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2020 Thanks for the suggestion. I have had another from an outside source which suggests that, if there was a transformer in the chain, then I could wrap some turns around the secondary as a detection coil and feed this coil to the comparator. At resonance this would detect a pulse? I have draw this up in the attached which shows some of the already built components. Do you think that might work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryA Posted December 18, 2020 Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 I would think that the transformer would destroy the nature of the resonance circuit. Are you thinking that if you find the resonance frequency of the real circuit then as the water is consumed it would change the resonance frequency by the change in capacity of the cell/capacitor? You may wish to make sure that you are getting the results you expect by driving the circuit with a fixed frequency and seeing if you get any results at all. By the way there is an online signal generator that you can sweep your circuit with to find the resonance frequency and drive the pll for a first test perhaps. https://www.szynalski.com/tone-generator/ You can get the output through you pc's speaker output jack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerrowman Posted December 18, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 I'm assuming that resonance will still occur but, due to the extra inductance of the transformer secondary, it will be at a lower frequency (see attached). I will mock it up in LTSpice and see what happens. If that's ok then I will put some components together in the new year. The purpose of resonance is not to determine fluid level, which can be done with a simple float detector, but rather to make the most of the energy input in building up a high voltage across the electrodes. This method of electrolysis relies of the breakdown of the water dielectric while at the same time limiting current flow so, rather than just supplying electrons to produce the splitting reaction, it causes ionisation to split the water. This is the approach of the late Stan Meyer, and which many are working on to refine based on his now lapsed patents, and given that he died just before he was to release his direct water injectors for car use. His method aside, improving the efficiency of H2 production is highly topical in the drive to make the overall cost of using Hydrogen comparable with battery technology. This is only one small part of that overall movement. In case you are interested I attach a technical brief of some of his work. The Birth of New Technology - S.Meyer.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerrowman Posted December 18, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2020 I've just run a Spice simulation and it seems, surprisingly, that the resonant frequency between points A & D is unaffected by having L3, the secondary of a transformer, in place. I had set the inductance of that coil at 3mH and being in parallel I thought it would have some effect but apparently not. While it's true that L3 would not be driven directly by the voltage source, but via induction from a primary winding, I doubt that would change this situation. Jules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryA Posted December 21, 2020 Report Share Posted December 21, 2020 Also consider power oscillators. Like the royer oscillator used in induction furnaces. Your capacitor would be part of the oscillator circuit thus solves the resonance problem. I tried one in LTspice like the one in this link; got oscillations similar to your voltage and current display above. I could not find a Spice model for an avalanche diode so I used a low voltage zener for the BYV26E. Searching on "royer oscillator" brings up lots of hits. https://krishnamurthy1995.wordpress.com/2016/04/20/royer-oscillator-based-induction-heater/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uziao Posted May 31, 2021 Report Share Posted May 31, 2021 Why was my post removed? Not a single thank you? Ok then... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerrowman Posted May 31, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2021 I know nothing about your post or why it was removed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.