M
martin griffith
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
'Electronics World' re-published in the October 2005 issue both Clarke'sA liitle bit of history
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/discovery.shtml
....'Electronics World' re-published in the October 2005 issue both Clarke's
letter to 'WW' in February 1945 about peacetime uses of V2 and the
article 'Extraterrestrial Relays'. Unfortunately, for commercial
reasons, the article is reproduced 4-up on an A4 page with acres of
white (well, grey) space, so it's almost unreadable.
John said:I read in sci.electronics.design that martin griffith
'Electronics World' re-published in the October 2005 issue both Clarke's
letter to 'WW' in February 1945 about peacetime uses of V2 and the
article 'Extraterrestrial Relays'. Unfortunately, for commercial
reasons, the article is reproduced 4-up on an A4 page with acres of
white (well, grey) space, so it's almost unreadable. The publishers will
sell you a readable version for money, at:
mailto:[email protected]
John Woodgate said:I read in sci.electronics.design that martin griffith
'Electronics World' re-published in the October 2005 issue both Clarke's
letter to 'WW' in February 1945 about peacetime uses of V2 and the
article 'Extraterrestrial Relays'.
I read in sci.electronics.design that martin griffith
'Electronics World' re-published in the October 2005 issue both Clarke's
letter to 'WW' in February 1945 about peacetime uses of V2 and the
article 'Extraterrestrial Relays'.
Most Elektor articles and projects are innovative in a way you wouldn't
have a hope of ever finding in monochromee EPE, let alone EW which is
just a collection of high-brow articles that fill pages easily.
I became homeless (intentionally), and spent a few years travellingThen obviously Martin has not been reading Elektor these past five (or
was it seven?) years. Sure, they too repeat the occasional project but
then how else would newcomers have a way of finding about stuff?
Most Elektor articles and projects are innovative in a way you wouldn't
have a hope of ever finding in monochromee EPE, let alone EW which is
just a collection of high-brow articles that fill pages easily. Just
look at Elektor's recent GBDSO, ARM, RFID, USB, XBox, OBD, DRM and
Electrosmog Detector projects which leave EPE and EW, ermm, lame?
Rick
A liitle bit of history
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/discovery.shtml
Adrian said:Does anyone still subscribe to that admag?
At the beginning of 2005, the new editor made it her policy to exclude
articles based on private research and to fill the space with consumer
product 'news' and other advertising puff from the marketing departments
of big corporations.
I had a long-term subscription but I cancelled it and got my money back.
It's a terrible pity what has happened to that magazine. I would like toAdrian said:Does anyone still subscribe to that admag?
At the beginning of 2005, the new editor made it her policy to exclude
articles based on private research and to fill the space with consumer
product 'news' and other advertising puff from the marketing departments
of big corporations.
I had a long-term subscription but I cancelled it and got my money back.
Packed it in 2 months ago. Been buying it since late '60s.
No way will I pay £4.20 to read worthless blather from worthless
marketing and sales rep's. Told her so.
Wished her well as final editor but asked that she let the mag' die
with a little dignity.
I think many of us would be interested in that mike.Adrian said:I too was a reader from the 1960s and had collected many issues from
long before that.
It was sad to see an editor so far out of touch with her inherited
readership that she could write such a stupid editorial. She
effectively kicked loyal readers and potential contributors in the teeth
by saying that the things they valued most in that publication were
worthless. I first thought it was a tongue-in-cheek message to goad
people to rally and support the magazine ...until I saw the next issue.
Your reply to her was a lot more imaginative than my letter to the
subscriptions department, but I also took the trouble to let them know
the reasons why I was cancelling my subscription.
The article I was about to submit on a novel capsule-array microphone
design has never been completed because I can't think where else to
publish it.
I think many of us would be interested in that mike.
Either put it up in A.B.S.E. or on a website with a suggested
donation for viewing.
Beats the heck out of me how one could collect $5.00 or less without
paying a fortune for the clearing of the credit card, tho.
I too was a reader from the 1960s and had collected many issues from
long before that.
It was sad to see an editor so far out of touch with her inherited
readership that she could write such a stupid editorial. She
effectively kicked loyal readers and potential contributors in the teeth
by saying that the things they valued most in that publication were
worthless. I first thought it was a tongue-in-cheek message to goad
people to rally and support the magazine ...until I saw the next issue.
Your reply to her was a lot more imaginative than my letter to the
subscriptions department, but I also took the trouble to let them know
the reasons why I was cancelling my subscription.
The article I was about to submit on a novel capsule-array microphone
design has never been completed because I can't think where else to
publish it.
The article I was about to submit on a novel capsule-array microphone
design has never been completed because I can't think where else to
publish it.