Generic AC USB chargers - Ipods and others

G

George

Jan 1, 1970
0
I've searched for this, but haven't found an explanation, and
thought someone here might know.

There appears to be a difference in the dedicated (AC) charger
requirements for Ipods versus other USB devices (other brands of
players, phones, or what have you). Moreover, there appears to be a
difference between generations of Ipods, such that some generic
chargers will work with older Ipods, but not the latest generation,
and vice versa.

Since I know it's true for my Sansa MP3 player, I'm gonna assume
that other similar devices that charge through a normal USB port
will also charge with a dedicated charger that provides 5VDC at a
few hundred milliamps, and such a charger need not be "intelligent"
at all. Do Ipods require something different? If so, what? And
how does that vary from one generation to the next?

Ideally, there would be Apple documentation providing this info, but
I haven't found it. If someone has a useful link on this, it would
be most helpful.

Thanks
 
P

PhattyMo

Jan 1, 1970
0
George said:
I've searched for this, but haven't found an explanation, and
thought someone here might know.

There appears to be a difference in the dedicated (AC) charger
requirements for Ipods versus other USB devices (other brands of
players, phones, or what have you). Moreover, there appears to be a
difference between generations of Ipods, such that some generic
chargers will work with older Ipods, but not the latest generation,
and vice versa.

Since I know it's true for my Sansa MP3 player, I'm gonna assume
that other similar devices that charge through a normal USB port
will also charge with a dedicated charger that provides 5VDC at a
few hundred milliamps, and such a charger need not be "intelligent"
at all. Do Ipods require something different? If so, what? And
how does that vary from one generation to the next?

Ideally, there would be Apple documentation providing this info, but
I haven't found it. If someone has a useful link on this, it would
be most helpful.

Thanks


Ditto,I'd like to see it too.

With my 2nd gen Nano,it won't charge no matter what I do. There's a
'trick' to getting some of the others to work from a 'non-smart' charger
that involves a couple resistors on the data lines,to either pull them
high,or low. This didn't work on my iPod,I guess it needs an actual USB
host controller to negotiate with? I dunno.
 
G

George

Jan 1, 1970
0
PhattyMo says...
With my 2nd gen Nano,it won't charge no matter what I
do. There's a 'trick' to getting some of the others to
work from a 'non-smart' charger that involves a couple
resistors on the data lines,to either pull them high,or
low. This didn't work on my iPod,I guess it needs an
actual USB host controller to negotiate with? I dunno.

On further research, it may have something to do with this:

http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/batt_charging_1_0.zip

That's a new standard for USB charging published in March,
2007. It now says that a dumb charger should have the data
lines shorted together. Go figure.

So maybe the old and new ipods look for different things.
And I guess it's also possible that ipods really want a
formal connection to be established anyway.

I just wish I could find an authoritative explanation of
what's required. I guess in time everything will comply
with the new standard, but in the meantime it would be nice
to know what the deal is for each ipod generation.
 
M

mpm

Jan 1, 1970
0
PhattyMo says...

�> With my 2nd gen Nano,it won't charge no matter what I
�> do. There's a 'trick' to getting some of the others to
�> work from a 'non-smart' charger that involves a couple
�> resistors on the data lines,to either pull them high,or
�> low. This didn't work on my iPod,I guess it needs an
�> actual USB host controller to negotiate with? I dunno.

On further research, it may have something to do with this:

http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/batt_charging_1_0.zip

That's a new standard for USB charging published in March,
2007. �It now says that a dumb charger should have the data
lines shorted together. �Go figure.

So maybe the old and new ipods look for different things.
And I guess it's also possible that ipods really want a
formal connection to be established anyway.

I just wish I could find an authoritative explanation of
what's required. �I guess in time everything will comply
with the new standard, but in the meantime it would be nice
to know what the deal is for each ipod generation.

Interesting. Thanks.
I received an iPod nano (video) as a Christmas gift. (My first iPod,
but not my first MP3 player.) Love it.

I was wondering what the charge current was (would be) if the device
did not enumerate on the USB bus? For example, if I just wanted to re-
charge the battery on a PC that did not have the iTunes software
installed. I discovered that in that case, the iPod nano will just
enumerate as an external hard drive, so I assume the 100mA "pre-
enumeration" limit would not necessarily have to be imposed (since the
device was enumerated)? That said, for all I know the charger
function may never need more than 100mA anyway... But I was curious
about that....

-mpm
 
J

JosephKK

Jan 1, 1970
0
Ditto,I'd like to see it too.

With my 2nd gen Nano,it won't charge no matter what I do. There's a
'trick' to getting some of the others to work from a 'non-smart' charger
that involves a couple resistors on the data lines,to either pull them
high,or low. This didn't work on my iPod,I guess it needs an actual USB
host controller to negotiate with? I dunno.

Not only that but an installed host application requirement soon to
follow. And certainly M$ centric. The SPA, MPAA, and RIAA types
cannot tolerate other than anal retentive copyright and DRM.
 
Top