Jim,
My beef with Mikey is not with LTSpice, but his incessant Kevin-like
harping about the bugs in PSpice...
Yes, I've noticed you feel threatened whenever I identify a bug in
PSpice, but not when someone else does, as if you feel threatened
at the possibility that you've bet at the wrong horse. Perhaps you
feel you can't join the LTspice crowd without looking stupid because
you've bet against it.
I've had a weak beef with you(but it always dies away pretty quickly)
because I've felt that you are unjustly insultive to me. For example,
you've accused me of not knowing how to even run PSpice, but it's you
that has had trouble. For example, you sent a bench mark of an Xtal
oscillator circuit to various SPICE people. LTspice immediately
showed the correct solution that it has a 300MHz spurious oscillation.
PSpice showed it faithfully oscillating at the XTal's 14MHz. While it
was possible to cause LTspice to do the same simulation(except 3x
faster) by setting the integration mode to Gear, it was extremely
difficult to get the correct answer out of PSpice. I had to show
youhow to run PSpice buy showing you how to watch the solution converge
to the correct anser as the maximum allowed timestep was reduced. But,
I don't harbor a resent toward you even though you've twice accussed me
in this public forum that I don't know how to run PSpice, a patently
stupid statement.
... like that will improve his seat count ?
Jim, I'd never accuse you of being a socialist, in fact, you'd
probably be an OK guy if you weren't so darn liberal. But where is
your entrepreneurial spirit. Why would seat count interest me when
it's a free simulator? If I thought selling licenses was the
best means to develop the best SPICE program in the most
profitable manner, then I'd run the biggest EDA/software company
and do that.
--Mike