Op-Amp Filter Circuit Transfer Function

LordSputnik

Aug 11, 2011
45
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
45
Hi!

I've been having some trouble deriving the transfer function of the following circuit:

opampckt.png


Currently, I start by saying T(s) = -Zf(s)/Zi(s), where T(s) is the transfer function in the complex frequency domain, Zf(s) is the feedback impedance and Zi(s) is the input impedance.

Zf(s) = 1/sC + R = (1 + sCR) / sC = (1 + (2.63x10^-3) s) / (470x10^-9 s)

Zi(s) = 1/sC + R = (1 + sCR) / sC = (1 + (22x10^-6) s) / (22x10^-9 s)

Then:

T(s) = (1 + (2.63x10^-3) s) / (1 + (22x10^-6) s) * (22/470)

This seems to be alright to me, but when I try to work out the unit step response by splitting the numerator into two parts (one looks like 1/(1 + sT), the other is s/(1+sT), so the differentiation rule for Laplace transforms can be used), I get:

v(s) = (22/470) * (1 + 118.5 e^(-t / 22 x 10^-6) )

Which doesn't seem to match the output from my simulator exactly (about 10% difference).

Any ideas?

Thanks!
 

Laplace

Apr 4, 2010
1,252
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
1,252
I derived the transfer function and found the corresponding form in a table of Laplace transforms. Not sure what you mean by splitting the numerator. I just substituted 1/s for Vi as the unit step function.

Of course you realize this is only a theoretical exercise since an op amp circuit as shown would not work properly with no input bias current.
 

Attachments

  • EP_35.pdf
    36 KB · Views: 157

LordSputnik

Aug 11, 2011
45
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
45
Thanks for your help! It seems that substituting numbers into your solution gives the same results as mine - I expect it was just an error in the simulation.

I only had 1/(s+a) in the very simple table I was using, so by splitting the numerator, I mean:

1/s * (s+a)/(s+b) = 1/s * (s/(s+b) + a/(s+b))

Which allowed me to work out the time domain response with the one equation I had.

The circuit is part of a pre-built board, so I expect a resistor has been included on the board to bias the input, but this has been left off the diagram to reduce the complexity. I'll check for this today.
 

duke37

Jan 9, 2011
5,364
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
5,364
Are the feedback components connected in parallel rather than in series?
 
Top