J
James Thompson
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
John Fields said:---
That's not my approach at all. I don't use a drop sensor.
What I'm suggesting is an astable with a manual frequency control (a
rheostat) triggering a monostable with a fixed pulse width.
To understand how it would work, assume that drops are leaving the
tube at a rate of 10 per second, that the astable was astabling at
10Hz, and that the monostable was strobing the LEDs for 10ms every
100ms.
What would happen is that as the drops fell a new one would be in
exactly the same place whare the old one was 100ms ago, and when it
was illuminated by the strobe, the impression would be given that
the new drop was the old drop which was suspended in space.
Now, increase the frequency of the astable a little, and the strobe
will flash a little earlier, illuminating the drop a little earlier
than it did the last one, giving the impression that the drop was
climbing. Slow the astable down, and it'll look like the drop was
falling. Not just the one drop though, the entire column of drops
will be illuminated and they'll all move in unison.
No, not the drop sensor but the synchronizing of the strobe.
The other was just my 2 cents.
I saw someone else mention a solenoid pump to precisely pump one drop with
each pulse. That may well be the whole solution and get rid of the old dc
motor pump. It would give precise control of both drop frequency and strobe.
JTT