D
David L. Jones
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Russ said:For me the pivotal moment was when they published their new amp design
mounted in a particularly cheap & shitty beige mini-tower computer case,
complete with big knobs to make it look supremely naff.
TT said:I don't think I ever claimed it was effective or even
prevented plagiarism ;-) Probably about as effective as
antismoking labels on cigarettes.
For irritation it is hard to match the recent format for such shows asMr.T said:Far less so IMO, and at least the cigarette packet warnings don't affect
the
cigarettes themselves, whereas watermarks always affect the actual
program.
I think the prime aim is simply to irritate viewers as much as possible,
and
the channels are engaged in a battle to see who can do it best.
MrT.
Suzy said:For irritation it is hard to match the recent format for such shows as
Border Security. About 2 minutes of good stuff, then lots of adverts, then a
recap of at least one minute of the previous two minutes. Arrgh!