audioguru2
- Apr 6, 2004
- 12,026
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2004
- Messages
- 12,026
Hi Trigger,
Of course your triac will eliminate the spark, because it eliminates the relay contacts. And the diac-triacs must be optically-isolated, so that the entire circuit isn't "live". Four diac-triacs will need to be connected in an H bridge, to reverse the motor.
But I think that a triac will create a problem where both the forward and reverse triacs will be conducting at the same time.
The logic signal disconnects its drive to the forward diac-triac, to turn it off, then activates a logic signal to the reverse diac-triac, to turn it on. But since the load is inductive, the current lags the voltage by 90 degrees, therefore the reversing diac-triac will turn-on before the inductor's current has reduced low enough to turn-off the forward triac. Don't forget that a triac is a "latch" that doesn't turn-off exactly when you want it to.
Of course your triac will eliminate the spark, because it eliminates the relay contacts. And the diac-triacs must be optically-isolated, so that the entire circuit isn't "live". Four diac-triacs will need to be connected in an H bridge, to reverse the motor.
But I think that a triac will create a problem where both the forward and reverse triacs will be conducting at the same time.
The logic signal disconnects its drive to the forward diac-triac, to turn it off, then activates a logic signal to the reverse diac-triac, to turn it on. But since the load is inductive, the current lags the voltage by 90 degrees, therefore the reversing diac-triac will turn-on before the inductor's current has reduced low enough to turn-off the forward triac. Don't forget that a triac is a "latch" that doesn't turn-off exactly when you want it to.