G
GPG
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Is this frequency plan viable.
http://www.geocities.com/gpg212/freqgen2.GIF
http://www.geocities.com/gpg212/freqgen2.GIF
GPG said:
That is a concern. Once locked the loop filter can be slow, and I hadI would say not.
The 40Hz comparison frequency is too low. That's going to force you to use
a very low loop bandwidth, which will make it slow to lock.
Had a D FF in mind for that part, only the difference out.You'd probably need to convert the mixer inputs to sine waves first; and
it'll produce sum and difference products, so you'd need a good low pass
filter to remove the 10.4-13 MHz sum product whilst passing the .4-4 MHz
difference. Finally, you'd need to square-up the sine waves again before
feeding them to the dividers.
Had a brief look, still reading.If the aim is to produce low frequencies with high resolution, how about a
DDS?
Will research. Thanks.If you want a PLL with small steps, consider Fractional-N.
Is this frequency plan viable.
http://www.geocities.com/gpg212/freqgen2.GIF