P
Paul Marcel
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Are there any?
Motorola made absolute pressure sensors, probably went to Freescale.Paul said:Are there any?
Tim Wescott said:Motorola made absolute pressure sensors, probably went to Freescale.
Other companies undoubtedly do, too. They probably aren't accurate
enough for a barometer, but who knows?
Are there any?
Do a search on the MPX2100.Paul Marcel said:Are there any?
Are there any?
Are there any?
Spehro said:Here's one that's exceptionally easy to use (built-in 14-bit ADC and
serial synchronous or asynch comms):
http://www.allsensors.com/datasheets/app_specific/14bit_dig_baro_ind.pdf
It's available at Digikey (not cheap, though).
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
Interesting part. May be in the price range for an application of mine.
Odd data sheet that doesn't seem to indicate the All Sensors' part #!??
Mentions "compatible with their GA142 series," but that's not _the_ part.
Thanks to Digi-Key's search...
DigiKey # BARO-A-4VPRIMEREF-ND
All Sensors # BARO-A-4V-PRIME-REF, per Digi-Key.
$104, not in stock, or perhaps they just soldout...
Thanks, Steve
Interesting reading the other responses. Another question is to what precision,
I suppose. I've built my own with the ability to detect changes in altitude of
50cm out of an empty spray can, some glass tubing, two LEDs, some nichrome wire,
a tiny circuit and power supply, and some DOT brake fluid. Cheap and sensitive,
but it won't work upside down!
Jon
Thinking aloud here (please don't flame me for this).
If one had mercury in a vessel, wouldn't the resistance change with
pressure (since the molecules are being compressed together under
higher pressure). If so, could you measure that difference to provide
an accurate mmHG reading.
Just a thought.
Also, I'm sure you could use a laser reflected also to get very
accurate measurements (especially if a mirror was floated on the
surface of the mercury).
I don't know how the industial grade Barometric sensors work so please
forgive me if I've stated the obvious.
And an interesting idea. Except that fluids in general, and mercury (a
liquid metal) are *mostly* incompressible.
I'd love to see that one. Is there a description and diagram on-line
somewhere?
I believe it was an amateur scientist column in scientific american, years ago.
But the basic thrust is this: The glass tubing is bent into a U shape, with one
side of the U curving back downwards and hooking into the top of the spray can.
That entry into the can needs to be sealed well with something that doesn't
outgas or leak. Some cans already have a rubber insert you can use for the
purpose. There are some epoxies, as well. The other end of the U is left
upwards pointing and open. The U will be filled with DOT fluid (it has some
wonderful properties for this purpose, if you think about it.) You wrap the can
with the nichrome wire. This will be used to heat the can and expand the air
inside. The two LEDs are used, one for an emitter and the other for a detector.
You can use a real detector, instead, though. This pair is then placed on the
leg of the U furthest away from the can. The nichrome is controlled as an
"on/off" type of control (simple) -- when the DOT brake fluid rises of its own
accord above the point on the U tube where the emitter/detector pair are at, the
trapped gas is expanding and you need to cut the heating current to the
nichrome; when the DOT brake fluid drops below, then the heating current is
turned on until the trapped gas heats enough to compensate. I forgot to add in
the earlier post that a thermistor or other means of measuring the can's
temperature is needed. Anyway, the can temperature is then interpreted. Even
slight up/down motions can be 'observed' as a change in temperature with enough
precision to see that 50cm adjustment. It drifts (or mine did) a fair amount
and absolute calibration gets lost over periods of days. But for measurements
over periods of hours to look for relative changes, it was great!
Jon