LT Spice problem

I'm trying to add the models of a couple of N-FETs I use to LTSpice. I'm
getting a simulation-time error that I can't resolve. Any ideas? Thanks.

The error:

|M1: Only a level 9 B3SOI can have 6 nodes

It thinks I have six terminals on my transistor and only SOI models have that
many? Looks like only three to me.


The circuit:

Version 4
SHEET 1 880 680
WIRE 144 -80 16 -80
WIRE 288 -80 144 -80
WIRE 16 -32 16 -80
WIRE 144 0 144 -80
WIRE 288 16 288 -80
WIRE 16 80 16 48
WIRE 288 112 288 80
WIRE 144 192 144 80
WIRE 240 192 144 192
WIRE 144 240 144 192
WIRE 288 288 288 208
WIRE 288 288 208 288
WIRE 288 320 288 288
WIRE 144 448 144 336
WIRE 224 448 144 448
WIRE 288 448 288 400
WIRE 288 448 224 448
WIRE 224 496 224 448
FLAG 224 496 0
FLAG 16 80 0
SYMBOL LED 272 16 R0
SYMATTR InstName D1
SYMBOL npn 208 240 M0
SYMATTR InstName Q1
SYMBOL res 272 304 R0
WINDOW 0 -7 51 Left 0
SYMATTR InstName R1
SYMATTR Value 100
SYMATTR SpiceLine tol=1 pwr=0.1
SYMBOL res 128 -16 R0
SYMATTR InstName R2
SYMATTR Value 10K
SYMATTR SpiceLine tol=1 pwr=0.1
SYMBOL voltage 16 -48 R0
SYMATTR InstName V1
SYMBOL DiodesInc\ Models\\DMG1012T 240 112 R0
SYMATTR InstName M1
TEXT -18 520 Left 0 !.op


The model:

*SYM=POWMOSN
..SUBCKT DMG1012T D=10 G=20 S=30
* TERMINALS: D G S
M1 1 20 3 3 NMOS L=0.6U W=47.66m
RD 10 1 220m
RS 30 3 80m
CGS 20 3 57p
EGD 12 0 20 1 1
VFB 14 0 0
FFB 20 1 VFB 1
CGD 13 14 27p
R1 13 0 1.00
D1 12 13 DLIM
DDG 15 14 DCGD
R2 12 15 1.00
D2 15 0 DLIM
DSD 3 10 DSUB
..MODEL NMOS NMOS LEVEL=3 U0=500 VMAX=80k
+ ETA=0.1m VTO=0.99 TOX=16.8n NSUB=4.57e16
..MODEL DCGD D CJO=27p VJ=80m M=0.320
..MODEL DSUB D IS=36.1n N=1.50 RS=21.8m BV=20
+ CJO=14p VJ=0.800 M=0.420
..MODEL DLIM D IS=100U
..ENDS

Another model with the same problem:

..SUBCKT irlml6402 1 2 3
**************************************
* Model Generated by MODPEX *
*Copyright(c) Symmetry Design Systems*
* All Rights Reserved *
* UNPUBLISHED LICENSED SOFTWARE *
* Contains Proprietary Information *
* Which is The Property of *
* SYMMETRY OR ITS LICENSORS *
*Commercial Use or Resale Restricted *
* by Symmetry License Agreement *
**************************************
* Model generated on Sep 25, 06
* MODEL FORMAT: SPICE3
* Symmetry POWER MOS Model (Version 1.0)
* External Node Designations
* Node 1 -> Drain
* Node 2 -> Gate
* Node 3 -> Source
M1 9 7 8 8 MM L=100u W=100u
..MODEL MM PMOS LEVEL=1 IS=1e-32
+VTO=-1 LAMBDA=0.0111358 KP=12.788
+CGSO=5.36099e-06 CGDO=5.54234e-08
RS 8 3 0.0246704
D1 1 3 MD
..MODEL MD D IS=2.03395e-08 RS=0.0432758 N=1.5 BV=20
+IBV=0.00025 EG=1 XTI=4 TT=1e-07
+CJO=1.11974e-10 VJ=0.5 M=0.3 FC=0.5
RDS 3 1 5e+07
RD 9 1 0.0001
RG 2 7 29.2227
D2 5 4 MD1
* Default values used in MD1:
* RS=0 EG=1.11 XTI=3.0 TT=0
* BV=infinite IBV=1mA
..MODEL MD1 D IS=1e-32 N=50
+CJO=1.68841e-10 VJ=1.50027 M=0.3 FC=1e-08
D3 5 0 MD2
* Default values used in MD2:
* EG=1.11 XTI=3.0 TT=0 CJO=0
* BV=infinite IBV=1mA
..MODEL MD2 D IS=1e-10 N=0.4 RS=3e-06
RL 5 10 1
FI2 7 9 VFI2 -1
VFI2 4 0 0
EV16 10 0 9 7 1
CAP 11 10 9.68769e-10
FI1 7 9 VFI1 -1
VFI1 11 6 0
RCAP 6 10 1
D4 6 0 MD3
* Default values used in MD3:
* EG=1.11 XTI=3.0 TT=0 CJO=0
* RS=0 BV=infinite IBV=1mA
..MODEL MD3 D IS=1e-10 N=0.4
..ENDS irlml6402
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
I'm trying to add the models of a couple of N-FETs I use to LTSpice. I'm
getting a simulation-time error that I can't resolve. Any ideas? Thanks.

The error:

|M1: Only a level 9 B3SOI can have 6 nodes

It thinks I have six terminals on my transistor and only SOI models have that
many? Looks like only three to me.

I don't have your symbol so can't run the subcircuit. But when I use
just your NMOS model it runs. You have to give V1 a voltage and the LED
still needs a model as well.

[...]
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Robert said:
Joerg said:
I'm trying to add the models of a couple of N-FETs I use to LTSpice.
I'm
getting a simulation-time error that I can't resolve. Any ideas?
Thanks.

The error:
|M1: Only a level 9 B3SOI can have 6 nodes

It thinks I have six terminals on my transistor and only SOI models
have that
many? Looks like only three to me.

I don't have your symbol so can't run the subcircuit. But when I use
just your NMOS model it runs. You have to give V1 a voltage and the LED
still needs a model as well.

[...]
Model...you mean the one with the long skirt and fancy hat?


No, no, the one with the bikini :)
 
H

Helmut Sennewald

Jan 1, 1970
0
I'm trying to add the models of a couple of N-FETs I use to LTSpice. I'm
getting a simulation-time error that I can't resolve. Any ideas? Thanks.

The error:

|M1: Only a level 9 B3SOI can have 6 nodes

It thinks I have six terminals on my transistor and only SOI models have
that
many? Looks like only three to me.


Hello krw,

I don't have your Mosfet-symbol, but I have been able to get it working.

1. The subcircuit definition was wrong. Below is the corrected line.

* D=10 G=20 S=30
..SUBCKT DMG1012T 10 20 30

2. Most of th models for power-Mosfets are subcircuits.
Therefore you can use the normal symbol "nmos" or "pmos" with a very small
modification.

Place a symbol "nmos" on the schematic.
Ctrl-right-mouse-click on the placed symbol.
A dialog will pop-up. Change Prefix:MN to Prefix:X
OK.

The attached example has bias point data flags on the nets
to better show the operating point.

Best regards,
Helmut
 
Robert said:
Joerg said:
[email protected] wrote:
I'm trying to add the models of a couple of N-FETs I use to LTSpice.
I'm
getting a simulation-time error that I can't resolve. Any ideas?
Thanks.

The error:
|M1: Only a level 9 B3SOI can have 6 nodes

It thinks I have six terminals on my transistor and only SOI models
have that
many? Looks like only three to me.


I don't have your symbol so can't run the subcircuit. But when I use
just your NMOS model it runs. You have to give V1 a voltage and the LED
still needs a model as well.

[...]
Model...you mean the one with the long skirt and fancy hat?


No, no, the one with the bikini :)

....and a long-tailed pair?
 
I don't have your symbol so can't run the subcircuit. But when I use
just your NMOS model it runs. You have to give V1 a voltage and the LED
still needs a model as well.

It seemed to do something here at home. I didn't have time to look at it
today. Maybe tomorrow they'll leave me alone so I can get back after it.
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
It seemed to do something here at home. I didn't have time to look at it
today. Maybe tomorrow they'll leave me alone so I can get back after it.

Just use the model alone. Package parasitics don't matter unless the LED
has to also send out GHz pulses ;-)

You can enter a ramp for the voltage source, then you can always see
where it loses steam.
 
Hello krw,

I don't have your Mosfet-symbol, but I have been able to get it working.

1. The subcircuit definition was wrong. Below is the corrected line.

* D=10 G=20 S=30
.SUBCKT DMG1012T 10 20 30

2. Most of th models for power-Mosfets are subcircuits.
Therefore you can use the normal symbol "nmos" or "pmos" with a very small
modification.

Place a symbol "nmos" on the schematic.
Ctrl-right-mouse-click on the placed symbol.
A dialog will pop-up. Change Prefix:MN to Prefix:X
OK.

The attached example has bias point data flags on the nets
to better show the operating point.

Thanks, Helmut. I still have something messed up. It can't find the model. I
should have time to work on it tomorrow.
 
Just use the model alone. Package parasitics don't matter unless the LED
has to also send out GHz pulses ;-)

Well it is in a GHz field, but I don't think I care about buzz.
You can enter a ramp for the voltage source, then you can always see
where it loses steam.

It's not getting that far. I must have something messed up with the
installation. It can't find anything now.
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Well it is in a GHz field, but I don't think I care about buzz.


It's not getting that far. I must have something messed up with the
installation. It can't find anything now.


Oh-oh, you crashed LTSpice? I though that wasn't possible. Might have to
re-install, it is fairly painless. I have to do that once in a while
because the LTSpice updater doesn't work.
 
R

Rich Grise

Jan 1, 1970
0
Robert said:
Joerg wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
I'm trying to add the models of a couple of N-FETs I use to LTSpice.
I'm
getting a simulation-time error that I can't resolve. Any ideas?
Thanks.

The error:
|M1: Only a level 9 B3SOI can have 6 nodes

It thinks I have six terminals on my transistor and only SOI models
have that
many? Looks like only three to me.


I don't have your symbol so can't run the subcircuit. But when I use
just your NMOS model it runs. You have to give V1 a voltage and the LED
still needs a model as well.

[...]

Model...you mean the one with the long skirt and fancy hat?


No, no, the one with the bikini :)

...and a long-tailed pair?

http://mysite.verizon.net/richgrise/images/comptran.gif

Cheers!
Rich
 
Oh-oh, you crashed LTSpice?

Not crashed, just edited or changed something I shouldn't have, perhaps.
I though that wasn't possible. Might have to
re-install, it is fairly painless. I have to do that once in a while
because the LTSpice updater doesn't work.

Really? It wanted to update my home copy but I didn't let it.
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Not crashed, just edited or changed something I shouldn't have, perhaps.

Unless you literally mucked with files in the LTSpice install directory
it's nearly impossible to break.

Really? It wanted to update my home copy but I didn't let it.


It always freezes up for me but it might be related to security settings.
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim said:
Not surprising. When it comes to software you have a black thumb.

I can't remember when I first installed LTspice. The Updater always
works.

Probably related to security settings. But it doesn't matter, this
software is literally bug-free (unlike others ...) and I only need to
update if a new must-have feature appear. Then it's rather quick and
easy. Uninstall, re-install .. get coffee .. hop back into seat.
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim said:
I don't run a firewall... that's what a good router is for.

Go to http://www.grc.com and run Shields Up and see what you get. I
get a 100% Stealth Rating.

Thanks, but I don't want to re-install half of my computer stuff here. I
get no viruses or any of that and if this is why the LTSpice updater
doesn't work it's ok. As I said, install by hand is painless. It is so
fast that I don't even have time to snatch a cookie out of the fridge
(although I'd like to).
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim said:
Jim said:
Jim Thompson wrote:
[snip]
Oh-oh, you crashed LTSpice? I though that wasn't possible. Might have to
re-install, it is fairly painless. I have to do that once in a while
because the LTSpice updater doesn't work.
Not surprising. When it comes to software you have a black thumb.

I can't remember when I first installed LTspice. The Updater always
works.

Probably related to security settings. But it doesn't matter, this
software is literally bug-free (unlike others ...) and I only need to
update if a new must-have feature appear. Then it's rather quick and
easy. Uninstall, re-install .. get coffee .. hop back into seat.
I don't run a firewall... that's what a good router is for.

Go to http://www.grc.com and run Shields Up and see what you get. I
get a 100% Stealth Rating.
Thanks, but I don't want to re-install half of my computer stuff here. I
get no viruses or any of that and if this is why the LTSpice updater
doesn't work it's ok. As I said, install by hand is painless. It is so
fast that I don't even have time to snatch a cookie out of the fridge
(although I'd like to).

Did you run Shields Up?

The computation machine bucks upon clicking "proceed" here, meaning it
won't continue:

https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim said:
Jim said:
Jim Thompson wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
[snip]
Oh-oh, you crashed LTSpice? I though that wasn't possible. Might have to
re-install, it is fairly painless. I have to do that once in a while
because the LTSpice updater doesn't work.
Not surprising. When it comes to software you have a black thumb.

I can't remember when I first installed LTspice. The Updater always
works.

Probably related to security settings. But it doesn't matter, this
software is literally bug-free (unlike others ...) and I only need to
update if a new must-have feature appear. Then it's rather quick and
easy. Uninstall, re-install .. get coffee .. hop back into seat.
I don't run a firewall... that's what a good router is for.

Go to http://www.grc.com and run Shields Up and see what you get. I
get a 100% Stealth Rating.

Thanks, but I don't want to re-install half of my computer stuff here. I
get no viruses or any of that and if this is why the LTSpice updater
doesn't work it's ok. As I said, install by hand is painless. It is so
fast that I don't even have time to snatch a cookie out of the fridge
(although I'd like to).
Did you run Shields Up?
The computation machine bucks upon clicking "proceed" here, meaning it
won't continue:

https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2

Gawwwwd! What is it you have screwed up on your machine? You're
probably running Windows Firewall ?:)

No. It's just very safe :)

Seriously, yes it will balk at web sites that are overly intrusive but
those are web sites I am not interested in anyhow. So what's the
problem? All they can find out is my connection IP and maybe track that
to find out my preferences. Only to discover that it's gone the next day
because I turn off the modem at night and it is dynamic IP.

It's similar when some spammer sends me an email with infested
attachments -> kersplosh ... gone.

If someone were interested in watching x-rated stuff on the computer
they would decidedly not be happy in this here office. Because most
likely it won't work.
 
M

Martin Riddle

Jan 1, 1970
0
Joerg said:
Jim said:
Jim Thompson wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:42:57 -0700, Joerg
<[email protected]>
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:42:24 -0700, Joerg
<[email protected]>
wrote:

[snip]
Oh-oh, you crashed LTSpice? I though that wasn't possible.
Might have to
re-install, it is fairly painless. I have to do that once in a
while
because the LTSpice updater doesn't work.
Not surprising. When it comes to software you have a black
thumb.

I can't remember when I first installed LTspice. The Updater
always
works.

Probably related to security settings. But it doesn't matter,
this
software is literally bug-free (unlike others ...) and I only
need to
update if a new must-have feature appear. Then it's rather quick
and
easy. Uninstall, re-install .. get coffee .. hop back into seat.
I don't run a firewall... that's what a good router is for.

Go to http://www.grc.com and run Shields Up and see what you get.
I
get a 100% Stealth Rating.

Thanks, but I don't want to re-install half of my computer stuff
here. I
get no viruses or any of that and if this is why the LTSpice
updater
doesn't work it's ok. As I said, install by hand is painless. It
is so
fast that I don't even have time to snatch a cookie out of the
fridge
(although I'd like to).
Did you run Shields Up?

The computation machine bucks upon clicking "proceed" here, meaning
it
won't continue:

https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2

Gawwwwd! What is it you have screwed up on your machine? You're
probably running Windows Firewall ?:)

No. It's just very safe :)

Seriously, yes it will balk at web sites that are overly intrusive but
those are web sites I am not interested in anyhow. So what's the
problem? All they can find out is my connection IP and maybe track
that
to find out my preferences. Only to discover that it's gone the next
day
because I turn off the modem at night and it is dynamic IP.

It's similar when some spammer sends me an email with infested
attachments -> kersplosh ... gone.

If someone were interested in watching x-rated stuff on the computer
they would decidedly not be happy in this here office. Because most
likely it won't work.

My LTspice III updater broke at one time, reinstall fixed it.

Cheers
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Martin said:
Joerg said:
Jim said:
Jim Thompson wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:42:57 -0700, Joerg
<[email protected]>
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:42:24 -0700, Joerg
<[email protected]>
wrote:

[snip]
Oh-oh, you crashed LTSpice? I though that wasn't possible.
Might have to
re-install, it is fairly painless. I have to do that once in a
while
because the LTSpice updater doesn't work.
Not surprising. When it comes to software you have a black
thumb.

I can't remember when I first installed LTspice. The Updater
always
works.

Probably related to security settings. But it doesn't matter,
this
software is literally bug-free (unlike others ...) and I only
need to
update if a new must-have feature appear. Then it's rather quick
and
easy. Uninstall, re-install .. get coffee .. hop back into seat.
I don't run a firewall... that's what a good router is for.

Go to http://www.grc.com and run Shields Up and see what you get.
I
get a 100% Stealth Rating.

Thanks, but I don't want to re-install half of my computer stuff
here. I
get no viruses or any of that and if this is why the LTSpice
updater
doesn't work it's ok. As I said, install by hand is painless. It
is so
fast that I don't even have time to snatch a cookie out of the
fridge
(although I'd like to).
Did you run Shields Up?

The computation machine bucks upon clicking "proceed" here, meaning
it
won't continue:

https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
Gawwwwd! What is it you have screwed up on your machine? You're
probably running Windows Firewall ?:)
No. It's just very safe :)

Seriously, yes it will balk at web sites that are overly intrusive but
those are web sites I am not interested in anyhow. So what's the
problem? All they can find out is my connection IP and maybe track
that
to find out my preferences. Only to discover that it's gone the next
day
because I turn off the modem at night and it is dynamic IP.

It's similar when some spammer sends me an email with infested
attachments -> kersplosh ... gone.

If someone were interested in watching x-rated stuff on the computer
they would decidedly not be happy in this here office. Because most
likely it won't work.

My LTspice III updater broke at one time, reinstall fixed it.

Hmm, how can that be installed separately? I always did a clean swipe
and re-installed the whole LTSpice chebang, hoping that this would also
fix the updater. But it never did.

It might really be the firewall or something though, in my case.
 
M

Martin Riddle

Jan 1, 1970
0
Joerg said:
Martin said:
Joerg said:
Jim Thompson wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 07:40:17 -0700, Joerg
<[email protected]>
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:42:57 -0700, Joerg
<[email protected]>
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:42:24 -0700, Joerg
<[email protected]>
wrote:

[snip]
Oh-oh, you crashed LTSpice? I though that wasn't possible.
Might have to
re-install, it is fairly painless. I have to do that once in
a
while
because the LTSpice updater doesn't work.
Not surprising. When it comes to software you have a black
thumb.

I can't remember when I first installed LTspice. The Updater
always
works.

Probably related to security settings. But it doesn't matter,
this
software is literally bug-free (unlike others ...) and I only
need to
update if a new must-have feature appear. Then it's rather
quick
and
easy. Uninstall, re-install .. get coffee .. hop back into
seat.
I don't run a firewall... that's what a good router is for.

Go to http://www.grc.com and run Shields Up and see what you
get.
I
get a 100% Stealth Rating.

Thanks, but I don't want to re-install half of my computer stuff
here. I
get no viruses or any of that and if this is why the LTSpice
updater
doesn't work it's ok. As I said, install by hand is painless. It
is so
fast that I don't even have time to snatch a cookie out of the
fridge
(although I'd like to).
Did you run Shields Up?

The computation machine bucks upon clicking "proceed" here,
meaning
it
won't continue:

https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
Gawwwwd! What is it you have screwed up on your machine? You're
probably running Windows Firewall ?:)

No. It's just very safe :)

Seriously, yes it will balk at web sites that are overly intrusive
but
those are web sites I am not interested in anyhow. So what's the
problem? All they can find out is my connection IP and maybe track
that
to find out my preferences. Only to discover that it's gone the next
day
because I turn off the modem at night and it is dynamic IP.

It's similar when some spammer sends me an email with infested
attachments -> kersplosh ... gone.

If someone were interested in watching x-rated stuff on the computer
they would decidedly not be happy in this here office. Because most
likely it won't work.

My LTspice III updater broke at one time, reinstall fixed it.

Hmm, how can that be installed separately? I always did a clean swipe
and re-installed the whole LTSpice chebang, hoping that this would
also
fix the updater. But it never did.

It might really be the firewall or something though, in my case.

Zonealarm just indicates port 53, which is DNS and Http (80). Might
want to check your DNS settings.
Otherwise the Updated can't be installed seperately, a full install is
needed.

Cheers
 
Top