OT? Soundwave Linear Electric Generator....

R

Robert Morein

Jan 1, 1970
0
Gerry said:
hmmmm....

18% heat energy to electricity efficient...

Isn't this better than:
IC engines?
Fuel Cells?
PV's?


http://www.lanl.gov/worldview/news/releases/archive/04-078.shtml

It may depend upon a heatsink temperature unrealistically low for an Earth
environment.
In the shadow of a spacecraft, a lightly loaded heatsink can be extremely
cold.

This device is a replacement for the thermocouple, which is notoriously
inefficient.
 
G

Gerry

Jan 1, 1970
0
Robert said:
It may depend upon a heatsink temperature unrealistically low for an Earth
environment.
In the shadow of a spacecraft, a lightly loaded heatsink can be extremely
cold.

This device is a replacement for the thermocouple, which is notoriously
inefficient.

So are PV's...

According what written about the device:

<snip>
The traveling-wave engine is a modern-day
adaptation of the 19th century thermodynamic
invention of Robert Stirling -- the Stirling engine --
which is similar to a steam engine, but uses heated
air instead of steam to drive a piston. The
traveling-wave engine works by sending helium gas
through a stack of 322 stainless-steel wire-mesh
discs called a regenerator. The regenerator is connected to a heat
source and a heat sink that causes the helium to expand and
contract. This expansion and contraction creates powerful sound
waves -- in much the same way that lightning in the atmosphere
causes the thermal expansion that produces thunder. These
oscillating sound waves in the traveling-wave engine drive the
piston of a linear alternator that generates electricity.
<snip>

It's about the temperature differential of "Helium" gas...and it
must run here on earth?
I'm sure its thoroughly tested on earth...but probably in space
conditions?

What's wrong with a Solar Parabolic mirror/array for a heat source?
The cold side of course would be ambient?
Means the device would run much hotter...maybe a different gas?
Mixture?
What gas doesn't expand and contract?

We just need to cheaply make those powerful sound waves.....for a
solar powered linear generator...
A magnet moving within a copper coil...or visa/versa..?

And here I thought thunder was caused by the inrush/collapse of air
after the electric
arc burnt it out.......hmmmm its really the thermal expansion? Or
both?

Wonder how noisy it is? Neighbors may not like it?

I just think this is an interesting new concept,
to generate Thermal-Solar electricity.....
 
R

Robert Morein

Jan 1, 1970
0
Gerry said:
So are PV's...
NASA has PV cells that are 35% efficient.
I don't think it's better than IC engines or fuel cells, rather, in the
middle of the range -- perhaps someone here would quote the relevant
figures.
The 18% figure is most likely quoted for the way NASA would use it, which is
not on Earth, but far from the sun, where the exhaust temperature for this
version of the Carnot cycle would be very low.
So, no, it's not a miracle replacement for other sources. It is a good match
to radioactive thermal isotopic heat sources, especially beyond the orbit of
Mars.
 
Top