Hey there,
I've got a little project going on and could really use your expertise.
Here's the scope: In my septic system, we've got a high water float that operates as a dry contact using a reed-style switch. It's Normally Open (NO), and when the float reaches a certain level, it closes the circuit, triggering an alarm (a Rhombus Tank 1 alarm, to be precise).
The float switch has two wires that are connected to the alarm.
Now, I'm looking to add another layer of monitoring by incorporating a second sensor that's Wi-Fi compatible.
The goal is for this new Wi-Fi sensor to send me an alert whenever the alarm is triggered along with the original alarm. I realize I could buy a whole new Wi-Fi-based Rhombus Alarm for three hundred, but I have a feeling this can be done with a twenty-dollar Wi-Fi sensor.
Here's what I've done so far: I ran an additional set of wires from the Rhombus alarm, branching them off ("Y" configuration) (Parallel), and connected them to a Wi-Fi dry contact sensor (DWZWAVE2.5-ECO), which boasts two dry inputs.
However, I'm encountering an issue with this setup.
The Eco Wi-Fi sensor seems to be behaving oddly. It initially reports as open, as it should, but when I trigger a test alarm, it closes and remains closed even after the circuit is opened again. It worked fine when not connected to this system as I tested the ECO by shorting the two dry contact. The Rhombus is working fine in this setup; only the ECO sensor remains closed.
My suspicion is that power is back-feeding from the Rhombus alarm to the Eco Wi-Fi dry sensor, causing it to act up. This setup currently works per say, in that when the circuit closes, it triggers the ECO, and I get an alert on my phone. It's just not resetting itself after the alarm is cleared, and that requires removing the battery on the ECO and resetting it each time it's triggered.
So, my question is: Is there a way to connect this second ECO Wi-Fi sensor on those two wires, piggy-backed from another sensor, but somehow removing the backfeed of power? or does it not work like that.
My understanding is the Rhombus alarm is sending some sensing voltage down the line to "watch" if the switch is closed and that voltage may be causing the issues on the second ECO sensor.
Additionally, I'm curious if using a diode or reversed diode on one of the inputs on the ECO might work? or some sort of multiplexer, allowing input from the two wire float switch and outputting to multiple dry contacts, keeping them isolated.
If a diode would work, which wire would it go to? or do I need to try both and see which one solves the issue?
I really appreciate your help with this.
Thank you!
Cheers
I've got a little project going on and could really use your expertise.
Here's the scope: In my septic system, we've got a high water float that operates as a dry contact using a reed-style switch. It's Normally Open (NO), and when the float reaches a certain level, it closes the circuit, triggering an alarm (a Rhombus Tank 1 alarm, to be precise).
The float switch has two wires that are connected to the alarm.
Now, I'm looking to add another layer of monitoring by incorporating a second sensor that's Wi-Fi compatible.
The goal is for this new Wi-Fi sensor to send me an alert whenever the alarm is triggered along with the original alarm. I realize I could buy a whole new Wi-Fi-based Rhombus Alarm for three hundred, but I have a feeling this can be done with a twenty-dollar Wi-Fi sensor.
Here's what I've done so far: I ran an additional set of wires from the Rhombus alarm, branching them off ("Y" configuration) (Parallel), and connected them to a Wi-Fi dry contact sensor (DWZWAVE2.5-ECO), which boasts two dry inputs.
However, I'm encountering an issue with this setup.
The Eco Wi-Fi sensor seems to be behaving oddly. It initially reports as open, as it should, but when I trigger a test alarm, it closes and remains closed even after the circuit is opened again. It worked fine when not connected to this system as I tested the ECO by shorting the two dry contact. The Rhombus is working fine in this setup; only the ECO sensor remains closed.
My suspicion is that power is back-feeding from the Rhombus alarm to the Eco Wi-Fi dry sensor, causing it to act up. This setup currently works per say, in that when the circuit closes, it triggers the ECO, and I get an alert on my phone. It's just not resetting itself after the alarm is cleared, and that requires removing the battery on the ECO and resetting it each time it's triggered.
So, my question is: Is there a way to connect this second ECO Wi-Fi sensor on those two wires, piggy-backed from another sensor, but somehow removing the backfeed of power? or does it not work like that.
My understanding is the Rhombus alarm is sending some sensing voltage down the line to "watch" if the switch is closed and that voltage may be causing the issues on the second ECO sensor.
Additionally, I'm curious if using a diode or reversed diode on one of the inputs on the ECO might work? or some sort of multiplexer, allowing input from the two wire float switch and outputting to multiple dry contacts, keeping them isolated.
If a diode would work, which wire would it go to? or do I need to try both and see which one solves the issue?
I really appreciate your help with this.
Thank you!
Cheers
Last edited: