Can't find any reason for having two different terminal styles in the
data sheets. What's the story here? Concave would seem easier to pick-
and-place manually IMO.
Hi
I did some work on this almost 10 years ago and introduced them at the
place I worked. They can relly save a lot in production price, but we
have had very much trouble getting the production up to speed of
mounting them without solder errors. As far as I know they never
succeeded in reducing the failure rate to a satisfactory level. But,
thats a long time ago, probably better now and perpaps your production
have more experience.
We used the convex version from phycomp, since the purchase department
reported that this was the dominant one used in the marked and thus
had some advantages. (ARV341). We had major problems in finding the
correct stensil thickness and footprint, did a lot of thermal cycling
tests. If you want, I think I can dig up some data?
Regards
Klaus