J
John Smith
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
David said:John said:[usual "come back to reality" chit]
Or, to put it simply, with a wide-band rf-amp, a high bandwidth opamp
and a few ic's interfaced on a USB bus to my computer, I have the
equivalent of a thousands-of-dollars-oscilloscope-of-the-90's ... all
for a VERY CHEAP price!
VERY CHEAP price usually = VERY CHEAP performance.
The front end electronics is the SAME for a PC based DSO as it is for
a real bench oscilloscope, or didn't you know that?
You still need the ultra flat frequency and phase response, the large
input range attenuator, the low noise floor, the trigger circuitry
etc, etc if you want a good performance oscilloscope.
...
Dave.
For starters, ever heard of negative feedback and how to use it to
control gain ... but then, you already knew that, didn't you?
Ever heard of "programmable gain amps." Etc., etc. ...
The problems in design/construction can be as simple/difficult as you
choose to make 'em. Nothing along these simple design specs you list
comes even close to impossible, nor even of great difficulty ...
No wonder "they" have gone offshore, seems a chit-load here has become
dumb-struck!
Regards,
JS