0-30 Vdc Stabilized Power Supply

audioguru2

Apr 6, 2004
12,026
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
12,026
MonSSter said:
I just builded your power supply but i doesn't work ;) ... at output it always shows ~34V and i can't regulate it with P1 ... U2 is heating like mad...
If U2 is faulty then the output voltage would be 34V minus two base-emitter drops. Measure the voltage at the output pin 6 of U2 to make sure. If the voltage is higher at Q2 then the transistors or one of them is shorted. Also, maybe U2 is destroyed by overheating.
Check that the pins on the transistors are connected correctly.

voltage on C1 is 34V, also on R1 ..
It is low, maybe you used a 24V transformer?

the voltage on U1, 6pin is 11.2V and it doesn't change if i move P1 ..
Perfect. P1 controls how much of the 11.2V goes to U2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MonSSter

Jun 6, 2004
18
Joined
Jun 6, 2004
Messages
18
i do use 24 transformer.

the 6pin on U2 shows ... 0V, and the Q2 shows 34V ... so you think that Q2 is destroyed?

 

audioguru2

Apr 6, 2004
12,026
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
12,026
If the collector and base of Q2 are reversed then the output of the project would be 33.3V and the output of U2 would normally go low to try correcting it.
Q2, Q4 or both might be shorted.

 

MonSSter

Jun 6, 2004
18
Joined
Jun 6, 2004
Messages
18
well ... i changed the orientation of the Q2( so that the emitor is pointing towards 8th pin( the base of Q4 ) ) and now the situation is following ... output voltage is 0.5V, u2 is still heating like mad ;), the voltage on Q2 collector is ~34V ...

Q4 base volt.  = 0,5V
      collector volt. = 34V

Q3 emmiter volt. = 34V

U2 output = ~200mV


any directions?

 
Last edited by a moderator:

audioguru2

Apr 6, 2004
12,026
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
12,026
Its output voltage (emitter of Q4) is 0.5V and also is ithe base of Q4. Therefore Q4 is shorted base to emitter.
The output voltage of U2 is less than the output voltage when it should be about 1.4V higher, and it gets very hot. Therefore U2 is destroyed.
Q2 might be damaged from being connected wrong, it probably damaged U2. 

 

Tristable

May 11, 2006
8
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
8
Hello,

it's me again.
I've replaced burned output transistor with 2 new ones.
I still belive that current regulation is not working, because load isn't reacting on pot 2 changing no mather how, just, like I said before, only drops the voltage down and turns the LED on at max setting.
Can you please give me some advices or measuring points to check this out?
Or, could it be something else wrong?

Please, help me!

Thanks, Triple.

 

audioguru2

Apr 6, 2004
12,026
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
12,026
Hi Triple,
I think your project works fine.
The current regulator causes the voltage to be reduced until the set amount of current flows in the load. Try a 10 ohms load resistor:
1) 30V/10 ohms= 3.0A.
2) If you turn down the current setting then only 20V/10 ohms= 2.0A.
3) Turn it down more then only 10V/10 ohms= 1.0A.
4) Turn the current setting all the way down and the output voltage should normally be nearly zero.

 

Tristable

May 11, 2006
8
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
8
Hi!

audioguru said:
I think your project works fine.
Yes, you're absolutely right! My power supply is working!  :D

I think the pot should have its wiring reversed so that it gives max current when it is turned to max.
Yes, you were right about that too. My apologies that I claimed contrary.

What else to say... Everything is working fine, just one thing I don't understand: I have exactly 30,8 VDC and 3,08 ADC at max setting over 10 Ohm resistor, but I have only 100VA transformer.  ???

And, of course, big big thanks to designer of this circuit, everyone who helped with it's modification, and especialy Mr. Audioguru for doing such a great job. Thank you. 
 

audioguru2

Apr 6, 2004
12,026
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
12,026
Tristable said:
My power supply is working!
Good! ;D

Everything is working fine, just one thing I don't understand: I have exactly 30,8 VDC and 3,08 ADC at max setting over 10 Ohm resistor, but I have only 100VA transformer.
 

Tristable

May 11, 2006
8
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
8
Hi!

When I buy proper heatsink I will test PS for a longer period and then report. It's robust, it will keep it up.  ::)

And a question about measuring output current as voltage over R7: wont R7s tolerance and temperature change ruin correct reading?

Thanks, Triple

 

spy_id

May 14, 2006
2
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
2
Hi audioguru and others,

Very much looking forward to building this but want to be 100% sure of the approach from the start. I'm fairly new to electronics though so please excuse the stupid questions... in replacing D1-D4 diodes with a single bridge and Q1/Q2 with TIP31A,

 

audioguru2

Apr 6, 2004
12,026
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
12,026
spy_id said:
replacing D1-D4 diodes with a single bridge
Yes. Then it can be bolted to the chassis as its heatsink.

don't we need an updated PCB diagram? Not sure Q2's TO220 style case and heatsink would fit well on the original board design. Unfortunately I already have the etched board!
The same pcb is fine. A few larger resistors will need to be spaced above the board. Q1 will need its pins bent around. Q2 can be bolted to the heatsink and won't need an insulatopr and the Q4's are also without insulators. Then insulate the heatsink from the chassis.
 

glockshotz

May 23, 2006
9
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
9
I am almost finish designing my power supply, However I was only able to get a transformer with a rating 24vdc with 100VA.  So my transformer will be supplying 4A current will this work?

 

audioguru2

Apr 6, 2004
12,026
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
12,026
A 24V transformer has a peak voltage of 34V. The rectifier bridge will drop about 2V at full output. The two darlington-connected output transistors, R15, R7 and U2 will drop about 8V at full output leaving about 24VDC for max output.

The transformer's peak voltage of 34V will have an average current of 4A which is 136VA. Your transformer is way overloaded when the project has a 4A output.

100VA/34V= 2.94ADC. When the load draws slightly less than 3A then the transformer will be operating at an average of 100VA.
Add them up:
24V/3A for the load. P= 72W.
8V/3A for the parts. P= 24W.
2V/3A for the rectifiers. P= 6W.
Total power= 102W.

 

muffits

Apr 26, 2006
5
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
5
At first I'm quite newbie in electronics and  me and my firend decided to make our course project about this power supply. And there is needed some analysis and calculations. So in schematic is C4, R8 and R9 ... why are these needed? I understand why C5 is nessesery, but isn't better to use a ceramic cap. (we use mod list - 3A@30V)? And there is that ripple... How I can make somekind of calculations about ripple in U2 output (pin 6.) and how about calculations about ripple smoothing by Q2 and Q4 (we going to use two 2N3055). And how about C9? (I undestand that, it puts U2 working also like integrator). C6 is understandable in high frequencieis...

can anyone help us about these problems ? :)

 

audioguru2

Apr 6, 2004
12,026
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
12,026
muffits said:
At first I'm quite newbie in electronics and  me and my firend decided to make our course project about this power supply.
Hi Muffits,
Welcome to our forum. ;D

So in schematic is C4, R8 and R9 ... why are these needed?
R8 and C4 are a filter to remove high frequency noise from the D8 reference voltage circuit. R9 isolates C4 so that D9 can reduce the voltage of the project quickly when current regulation needs it to be reduced.

I understand why C5 is nessesery, but isn't better to use a ceramic cap?
It doesn't matter because the opamps don't operate at radio frequencies when a ceramic cap would be necessary.

And there is that ripple... How I can make somekind of calculations about ripple in U2 output (pin 6.) and how about calculations about ripple smoothing by Q2 and Q4 (we going to use two 2N3055).
U2, Q2 and Q4's amplify the reference voltage output of U1. U1 has hardly any ripple because it is the current source for D8 and buffers D8 from the unregulated supply.

And how about C9? (I undestand that, it puts U2 working also like integrator). C6 is understandable in high frequencieis...
C9 reduces the high frequency gain of U2 so that it doesn't oscillate when Q2 and Q4 are added in its negative feedback loop.
 

muffits

Apr 26, 2006
5
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
5
A silly question: in wich frequency is low pass filter (R8, R9 and C4) calculated on? I mean does it block from 100Hz to ...?

 

audioguru2

Apr 6, 2004
12,026
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
12,026
muffits said:
A silly question: in wich frequency is low pass filter (R8, R9 and C4) calculated on? I mean does it block from 100Hz to ...?
The resistor R8 has part of P1 in series with it so the total resistance is about 32k ohms. Therefore the cutoff frequency of 32k ohms with C4 is about 50Hz.View attachment 39099

 

muffits

Apr 26, 2006
5
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
5
A small thing that I've noticed... I simulated C4, R8 and R9 and only R8 and C4... and thing is that with R9 isn't it 3 order LPF (as without it it's 2 order LPF)? The thing is with with R9 it cut's harder frequencies, then without R9..... it's just a remark...btw at 100Hz it drops ripple voltage something like 30 times...c :)

And a question.... I understand why C6 and C9 are neended, but can anyone explain they workin principals.... Sry about all my silly questions, but I can't get rest, unless I know enough :-D

PS. If anyone intrested, then this is how should U3 output voltage look like, then it is working. (the red one is u3 output)

View attachment 39110

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top