Tam/WB2TT said:
Never saw an actual IBM MB, but did have the original AT&T 8086 version.
Sounds like the same thing, except the AT&T went modern with a floppy drive,
and no tape. Did the IBM original use an MC6845 for driving the display?
Occurs to me, that probably cost more than the 8088.
The 8088 wasn't a cheap part when the original PC was designed. It,
and the other Intel chips probably cost more than the rest of the chips
on the motherboard. The 16K * 1 memory chips were quite common at the
time, and I think that the non floppy version was shipped with only 32K
of RAM. If I can find it, I had the BYTE magazine with the original
press release for the PC, and another with their review of the first PC.
BTW, did you know that you could convert the 256K XT motherboard to
the 640K version by plugging a chip into an empty socket, and soldering
two adjacent pads together? Then you replaced the first two banks of
RAM with 256K chips to get 640K. When I was still repairing the
original XTs I did that modification to a lot of them to free up several
expansion slots, and to reduce the load on the small power supplies.
The non hard drive versions were shipped with a 63 watt supply.
As far as the 6845, I did see them in the early PCs and clone video
boards.
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida