O
OG
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
BOOM! Quite efficiently, but all the light shines at the same time.
Light and heat and improved ventilation
BOOM! Quite efficiently, but all the light shines at the same time.
Why should that matter? Savings at the consumption end should result
in proportional savings in transmission.
"Well, you shouldn't discount all that free electric heating you get
with incandescents (it's free, because you've already attributed the
cost to lighting). In the winter that waves on fuel bills, and in the
summer it help our airconditioners run longer, to efficiently
dehumidify the air."
It's only "free" if you have electric heat rather than natural gas or fuel
oil, both of which are cheaper. Even then, it's arguably not quite as good as
a floor heater, since most of the heat will stay up on the ceiling where the
lamp is rather than being forced down to circulate among the people -- I
imagine draftier homes or a ceiling fan may mitigate this, however.
That being said, for people with electric heating, in winter I think running a
few spare PCs on BOINC or something similar is a pretty good idea!
Are you aware of just how HOT the Antarctic is compared
to 0 deg Kelvin?
hmm, how to get gas into a fuel cell...
<grin> Yep.
In my shop, our CPUs ran so hot we had to air condition the
room even in winter.
Tim,
I believe the 4 packs of GE compact fluorescents are $9.99 at your local Wally
World --> $2.50 each.
I haven't seen the kind of prices Graham is quoting for non-"no name" bulbs.
Nuclear power plants don't give off steam.
Amount of water per vehicle per day might be minimal, but multiply that
by millions of vehicles per day it might make a small difference.
It was, with CRT terminals. Since those are disappearing by now, theWhen my disk died, I moved to a Toshiba laptop that has one of those
energy star labels on the cover. My power usage dropped 100Kwh/month.
I think it was the terminal that was using most of the power.
It was, with CRT terminals. Since those are disappearing by now, the
worries expressed in this thread about the energy wasted by
screensavers are, if not misplaced, then at least vastly exaggerated.
It was, with CRT terminals. Since those are disappearing by now, the
worries expressed in this thread about the energy wasted by
screensavers are, if not misplaced, then at least vastly exaggerated.
Edward said:And even with CRT's, with modern computers. I had a vintage '99
machine now replaced by a vintage '05 machine, both with CRT's, and I
know that when the machines went to sleep (blank screen) the CRT's
stayed cool. Then, you did say "screen savers"... I guess if you
configure your PC in order to watch bouncing globes on a CRT during all
its idle hours, that's your business.
OTOH, I can see that in a modern office building, there must have been
some time window when concern about the power consumption of 1000's of
idling CRT's would have been a legitimate concern.
Heck, we pay to watch images dancing on the TV screen, don't weAnd even with CRT's, with modern computers. I had a vintage '99
machine now replaced by a vintage '05 machine, both with CRT's, and I
know that when the machines went to sleep (blank screen) the CRT's
stayed cool. Then, you did say "screen savers"... I guess if you
configure your PC in order to watch bouncing globes on a CRT during all
its idle hours, that's your business.
Yes, certainly. In the summer it could've been quite a significantOTOH, I can see that in a modern office building, there must have been
some time window when concern about the power consumption of 1000's of
idling CRT's would have been a legitimate concern.
Maybe from that paragon of honesty who claimed he
invented the internet...
And even with CRT's, with modern computers. I had a vintage '99
machine now replaced by a vintage '05 machine, both with CRT's, and I
know that when the machines went to sleep (blank screen) the CRT's
stayed cool. Then, you did say "screen savers"... I guess if you
configure your PC in order to watch bouncing globes on a CRT during all
its idle hours, that's your business.
OTOH, I can see that in a modern office building, there must have been
some time window when concern about the power consumption of 1000's of
idling CRT's would have been a legitimate concern.
the cooling towers emit water vapour, which is basically the same stuff.
how much water do petroleum fueled vehicles produce?