I haven't done any changes in this circuit.
This is my reply in MP's email notification that I got yesterday:
Hello Mike.
The circuit is correct. I had to sit back and think of the theory behide the
varicaps for a while and check the real PCB. The result is that the circuit
is correct. Every varicap, like zeners, has to be biased in reverse order,
otherwise it acts as ordinary diodes. If you see, the cathode is DC
connected to the +5V line, via the coil, and the anode is allways connected
to a lower voltage, via the potensiometer.
The PCB is verifying this. The black line in diode's body goes to +5V. I
made it severals years ago and was hard to find it in the pile, but still
works! Here is a foto that I took yesterday with my mobile phone camera,
while I was listening some random radio station.
I used the BB329 varicap in this prototype and works very well.
However, I should say a few more words that may not be obvious.
1) The operation range of the varicap in this circuit is 0..5V. The BB329 works up to 32V but here is used up to 5V. This results in about 40 to 15pF.(The datasheet is wrong when it says VR=3V -> ~3pF. It should say VR=
30V -> ~3pF. Check the "Capacitance versus reverse Voltage daigram".) Use a similar varicap.
2) If you decide to use the LPT option, cut the line in point "
A", delete the potensiometer and connect the "
B" point, to
wiper's line. If you leave the pot in, you may use it for manual micro-tuning but it will introduce some unwanted voltage drop of the R2-R LADDER circuit.
3) In my prototype I used the LPT option, without any potensiometer.
Furthermore, I added an op amp connected as a buffer x1 from "B" to "A", just to be sure that the R2-R LADDER circuit will work with my LPT port. However if the pot is deleted, the buffer is not necessary.
P.S.
Dont's ask me for the PCB layout. I tranfered the circuit by hand directly into the PCB. One time job.
Kyriakos
View attachment 39683