P
Phil Allison
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
"Floyd LIAR Davidson"
** **** the HELL OFF
you know nothing SEPTIC BLOODY IDIOT !!!
..... Phil
** **** the HELL OFF
you know nothing SEPTIC BLOODY IDIOT !!!
..... Phil
"Archimedes'= LUNATIC TROLL"
** Go DROP DEAD !!
you VILE TROLLING PIECE OF AUTISTIC SHIT
You are DimBulb and I claim my £1000.
Graham
Not in the civilised world.
http://www.thinkscience.co.jp/toolshed/2008/10/british-vs-american-english-spelling/
Graham
Have you even the tiniest clue yourself ?
Graham
He does at least know what he's talking about, unlike you.
Jesus Wept !
Graham
** Wrong context - you FUCKWIT IMBECILE
PC sound cards and small recorders are not 100 years old !!
YOU FUCKING ASININE LYING IDIOT !!!
It would be SO nice if Australia wasn't so economically tapped out that"Floyd LIAR Davidson"
** **** the HELL OFF
you know nothing SEPTIC BLOODY IDIOT !!!
.... Phil
Note how the PhilTard resorts to this abuse when he has his inane"Archimedes'= SCHIZOPHRENIC LUNATIC TROLL"
** Go DROP DEAD !!
you VILE TROLLING PIECE OF AUTISTIC SHIT
Archimedes' said:A 10kV arc from a 2MV lightning strike *COULD* make it all the way into
the handset, and OUT of the perforations in the handset, through the
earpiece or mouthpiece, and hit the user. The microphone and the
earpiece transducer both use metal cans, making the distance to the user
a mere 1/4" through air. Not good.
This is ONE of the many reasons that isolation elements are
incorporated at VARIOUS locations in the system. One of which is at the
CABLE connection to the phone itself, which is why isolation elements can
be found at these positions. This is a standard element of device design
where human contact is present, and has nothing to do with it being in a
plastic case. It isn't your Dad's AC fed two wire drill motor with an
un-phased power cord and metal case. It is, however, in close
(electrical) proximity (potentially) with lightning events, and that is
why arresting elements have been incorporated.
Most incorporations are overkill, as it were, but I am happy that our
scientists and engineers of decades past were concerned about such
things.
Idiots today seem to think everything is low voltage and harmless.
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrel said:Which go via optical fibre or microwave link, NOT cable any more.
Graham
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrel said:Rather different to 2k I think you'll agree.
Ribbons are FAR lower. Maybe 50 ohms AFTER the transformer !
And Pin 1 on an XLR is ALWAYS the cable shield. It may also be GROUND - but
that's another story. It certainly isn't used to provide phantom power under
ANY circumstances.#
Paul B said:Hello Tony and everyone, I am the OP.
I've been away for a few days and I see there's so many posts that
now I'm trying to get through them all!
MY OBJECTIVE
My aim is to take voice recordings made on various equipment and save
them to a PC. Some of the voice recordings are of telephone
conversations made onto tape. I would prefer to have fed the phone
signal direct to the PC but I get a lot of noise.
I want to preserve as much quality as possible because it will
probably be necessary for a third party to identify the person
speaking.
------
Secondly and quite separately from the above....
I didn't raise this problem in my first post. I am getting hum and
noise when I record using a purpose build connector (Retell model 156
~ see link below) to a hand-held battery-powered flash-memory
recorder even when the phone is on hook. I can't see where the hum
is coming from unless it is on the phone line because there can't be
a ground loop this time.
http://www.telephonerecorder.co.uk/recording/connectors/156.htm
I do know my landlines don't have all the hum and noise so they must
be doing something which I want for my recorder! I thought may be a
transformer to better terminate the Virgin Media phone line might
help but I am out of my depth here and line termination may be the
wrong idea altogther.
DEFINITIONS
I guess my use of the word "matching" is not a very good electrical
description. I'm not seeking to match impedances and I get the
feeling that in electrical engineering, "matching" is often shorthand
for impedence matching. So apologies for any confusion I have
caused.
I want to minimise any ground loop to reduce hum and other spuriae so
perhaps I should have said "isolating" transformer.
Retell have a model (the 157) which connects direct to a PC and I
believe it is identical to the 156 except it has the additional
transformer I am asking about.