Good verses bad VCRs ?

[Tony Pearce]

Post your results - arsehole.

I've told you the results and how to test it for yourself. YOU just refuse
to measure it yourself, so you can claim you have never seen the problem!
You do like to argue from a position of ignorance, because that is your only
possible position.

TonyP.

 

[Tony Pearce]

"Mitchell McCreath" <

** No it is not.
90dB s/n is typical performance.

Not on any deck I've measured (3 * Panasonic, JVC, Sony, NEC) I'd love to
know where you get that figure as typical. Manufacturers brochures perhaps?
And what's the typical performance before noise reduction Phil?

TonyP.

 

[Phil Allison]

"roverT"

Phil A.

Not on any deck I've measured (3 * Panasonic, JVC, Sony, NEC)

** All lies.

I'd love to know where you get that figure as typical.

** Published test reports, published specs and my own tests.

You are just a stinking liar - roverT.

And what's the typical performance before noise reduction Phil?

** 60 dB s/n pre companding.




............. Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

"roverT"

"Phil Allison" <

** That is a new bogey man.

Post your results - arsehole.

If you are not too busy fucking store window mannequins.

I've told you the results and how to test it for yourself.

** When, where ??

You are just FULL of lies.

You do like to argue from a position of ignorance,

** Go root a dog - roverT.



.......... Phil

 

[Tony Pearce]

** When, where ??

Check Google, or just use your CRO and a tone burst generator. I guess
that's too hard for you to figure out!

You are just FULL of lies.

Nobody holds a candle to you Phil.

TonyP.

 

[Tony Pearce]

Post your results - arsehole.

Still waiting for yours Phil.

TonyP.

 

[Phil Allison]

"roverT'

"Phil Allison" <

Check Google, or just use your CRO and a tone burst generator.

** Post your test details and results - with no details there is nothing
to discuss.

It is guaranteed a dog raping moron like you has no clue how to interpret
such tests.




........... Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

"Tony Pearce" <

Still waiting for yours Phil.

** So you do not have any results to back up ***YOUR stupid fucking claim
***.




............. Phil

 

[Bill Bailley]

"roverT'



** Post your test details and results - with no details there is nothing
to discuss.

It is guaranteed a dog raping moron like you has no clue how to interpret
such tests.




.......... Phil

Dear Phil,
I am not quite sure if you are trying to demonstrate your technical
knowledge or your command of invective. It appears to me you are not doing
well on either score. Do you think you could now tone it down to an
acceptable level for a technical newsgroup. This is tiresome, childish, and
un-Australian.
Do the right thing please, you are an embarrassment to our country.
Kindest regards,
Bill.

 

[Phil Allison]

"Bill Bailley"


** Dear Bill, kindly go root your mother.

You are a pompous, posturing ass and as such disgrace to humanity.

You have not got the fucking faintest idea **WHO** "Trevor Pearce " IS or
** WHY** he spends his time harassing me on several NGs with insane
bullshite.

BTW Never butt into an argument and take sides based on your pig
ignorant ** PREJUDICES** unless you want to cop a full-on one yourself.




.......... Phil

 

[Bill Bailley]

"Bill Bailley"


** Dear Bill, kindly go root your mother.

You are a pompous, posturing ass and as such disgrace to humanity.

You have not got the fucking faintest idea **WHO** "Trevor Pearce " IS or
** WHY** he spends his time harassing me on several NGs with insane
bullshite.

BTW Never butt into an argument and take sides based on your pig
ignorant ** PREJUDICES** unless you want to cop a full-on one yourself.




......... Phil

Dear Phil,
I don't know who Trevor Pearce is, nor do I care. I DO care that you are not
giving any consideration on what others may think of you, and of the
extremely poor image you are presenting to this newsgroup, and to the rest
of the world. You may wish to cease and desist just in case your soapbox is
removed.
Bill.

 

[Phil Allison]

Dear Phil,

I don't know who Trevor Pearce is, nor do I care.

** Then you are a despicable bastard and deserve the worst that life can
hand out to you.

Drop dead.




............ Phil

 

[Bill Bailley]

** Then you are a despicable bastard and deserve the worst that life can
hand out to you.

Drop dead.




........... Phil

Dear Phil,
This is a small extract from the acceptable use policy as laid down by
Optus. Is there any part of this you wish to discuss in your typical
language.
Regards,
Bill.

__________________________________________________________________________
4.2 When using the Service, you must not break any laws, infringe the legal
rights of any person or cause harm to the Service or its users. For example,
you must not:

a. defame, harass or abuse anyone or violate their privacy;
b. distribute or make available obscene, pornographic, illegal or
confidential material (for the avoidance of doubt and without limitation,
you must not place on the Internet any content in contravention of
applicable laws of the States, Territories or the Commonwealth);

 

[Phil Allison]

Dear Phil,
This is a small extract from the acceptable use policy as laid down by
Optus.

** What is your problem ??

Are you some kind of mad net policeman ??

Or just being politically correct to the point of being nauseating ??

You are way out of line and utterly wrong on all counts.





............ Phil

 

[Bill Bailley]

** What is your problem ??

Are you some kind of mad net policeman ??

Or just being politically correct to the point of being nauseating ??

You are way out of line and utterly wrong on all counts.





........... Phil

Dear Phil,
In my own small way, I am reminding you that the kind of abuse that you feel
is required to "win" a point, is outside the Optus AUP. This is a shared
service and you are spoiling it for me and presumably others. Please stop.
Regards,
Bill.

 

[Phil Allison]

Dear Phil,
In my own small way, I am reminding you that the kind of abuse that you feel
is required to "win" a point, is outside the Optus AUP.

** Give an example - an actual post.

Then I will point how you are wrong.

The whole issue is identity.

EG Tony Pearce is a fake name with a fake addy.




.......... Phil

 

[Tony Pearce]

** Post your test details and results - with no details there is nothing
to discuss.

You're so right, so lets see yours?

TonyP.

 

[Tony Pearce]

** So you do not have any results to back up ***YOUR stupid fucking claim

Pot, kettle, black.

I told you how to measure one problem, and you just refuse to do it. Not
unusual for someone who prefers to argue from a position of ignorance.

At least you now agree the real S/N ratio is only 60dB.

TonyP.

 

[Phil Allison]

"roverT" the perverT

"Phil Allison" < claim


I told you how to measure one problem, and you just refuse to do it.

** You did not post any details of the test.

You did not say WHAT it was even supposed to prove.

YOU have to post a case before it gets a reply.

At least you now agree the real S/N ratio is only 60dB.

** The real s/n is 90 dB.

There is no possible way to detect by ear such low level noise when there is
clean sound 60 dB louder at the same time.





........... Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

"roverT" the perverT

"Phil Allison" <

nothing to discuss.

You're so right, so lets see yours?

** Go back to your kiddie porn.





............ Phil