Good verses bad VCRs ?

T

Tony Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
You did not say WHAT it was even supposed to prove.

Obviously that you can't read.
** The real s/n is 90 dB.

You can't even make up your mind whether it's 60dB or 90dB. Do you actually
understand how noise reduction systems work? (obviously not)
Answer this, given a 0dB level tone or single note, how far below is the
wide band noise floor for your "typical" HiFi VCR?
How far below for a typical CD Player?
There is no possible way to detect by ear such low level noise when there is
clean sound 60 dB louder at the same time.

Maybe not for you, but most people can do it easily when the noise is
wideband and the signal is narrow band, like a single note for example, or
solo piano played forte'. At least you now state 60dB once again I see.

TonyP.
 
T

Tony Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
** Go back to your kiddie porn.

That would be YOUR fixation it seems.

I see you have nothing better to add though, like actual data. Always asking
for what you are never prepared to supply yourself.

TonyP.
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"roverT" the perverT
"Phil Allison"

Obviously that you can't read.


** "roverT" the perverT has presented no case - since he never had one
to present.

You can't even make up your mind whether it's 60dB or 90dB.


** "roverT" the perverT is publicly masturbating again - YUK.

there
is clean sound 60 dB louder at the same time.


Maybe not for you, but most people can do it easily ...


** Massive lie made up by the perverT.

when the noise is wideband and the signal is narrow band, like a single
note for example,


** Massive lie #2.





............. Phil
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"roverT" the perverT
"Phil Allison" <


That would be YOUR fixation it seems.

I see you have nothing better to add though, like actual data.


** Your claim - you need to present the evidence.

Clearly you have none.

Just more lies.



......... Phil
 
T

Tony Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
** Your claim - you need to present the evidence.

YOU claimed HiFi VCR was as good as CD with no evidence. You now admit it is
not, but that some people can't tell the difference. Presumably yourself
anyway :)

TonyP.
 
T

Tony Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
{Snip typical PA obscene garbage and *NO* relevant material}

Lack of response to simple questions noted Phil. Can't answer, or you
realise the answers don't match your phoney claims?
*Hint, the difference is over 30 dB in favour of CD!!!!!!!!

Bluster and obscenity is not a very good substitute for knowledge Phil. Try
making some measurements for yourself, rather than typing all day with one
hand!

TonyP.
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"roverT" the perverT
"Phil Allison" <
YOU claimed HiFi VCR was as good as CD...


** No answer and change of subject noted - from a turd who has zero
honesty.


What I said earlier was that a hi-fi VCR could be used to copy high quality
CDs with no audible loss of that quality. I quoted the relevant performance
figures that place VHS hi-fi miles ahead of any audio cassette or RR tape
machine.

Your posts Mr Pervert are all nothing but fucking, illogical, irrelevant
verbal excrement.

Every post you have ever mad on Usenet included.





.......... Phil
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"roverT" the perverT
"Phil Allison" <


** "roverT" the perverT has presented no case - since he never had one
to present.

** "roverT" the perverT is publicly masturbating again - YUK.

there is clean sound 60 dB louder at the same time.
Maybe not for you, but most people can do it easily ...


** Massive lie made up by the perverT.

when the noise is wideband and the signal is narrow band, like a single
note for example,


** Massive lie #2.


*** WHERE ARE YOUR ANSWERS ??????????????????

You need to PROVE your mad claims are NOT LIES !!!!!!!!!!

Lack of response to simple questions noted Phil.


** No need to answer any INSANE questions from a autistic, sexual deviate
who cannot post even the beginnings of a a case.




............ Phil
 
T

Tony Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
there is clean sound 60 dB louder at the same time. {snip}

** Massive lie

Others with normal hearing disagree with you Phil.
(Others will need to read the part Phil snipped, whilst continually abusing
others for doing the same!!!)
*** WHERE ARE YOUR ANSWERS ??????????????????

So you admit you still do not know? The figures have already been posted in
this very thread. Try Google.
You need to PROVE your mad claims are NOT LIES !!!!!!!!!!

You have still to prove yours, I simply disagreed with it.
** No need to answer any INSANE questions

Lack of data still noted.

TonyP.
 
T

Tony Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
YOU claimed HiFi VCR was as good as CD...
** No answer and change of subject noted

What change?
What I said earlier was that a hi-fi VCR could be used to copy high quality
CDs with no audible loss of that quality.

Ah, the new get out. "audible quality" as defined by Phil Allison's hearing.
And he admits he can't hear a -60dB noise floor.
I quoted the relevant performance
figures that place VHS hi-fi miles ahead of any audio cassette or RR tape
machine.

Irrelevent except for those living in the past like Phil.

TonyP.
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"roverT" the perverT
"Phil Allison" <


What change?


** YOU FUCKING SNIPPER
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

quality CDs with no audible loss of that quality.
Ah, the new get out.


** YOU FUCKING LIAR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Irrelevent .


** YOU FUCKING LIAR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




......... Phil
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT


ad infinitum.......



........... Phil
 
T

Tony Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
Phil Allison said:
** YOU FUCKING SNIPPER
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How amusing after you just did it to me!!!!!!! :)

What actual facts or data are left in your post, oh yes
NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TonyP.
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT



ad infinitum



............. Phil
 
T

Tony Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
Phil Allison said:
roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT

roverT is a perverT
ad infinitum

A bit old for the schoolboy antics aren't you Phil?
Don't like being proven wrong do you. :)

TonyP.
 
V

Vermin

Jan 1, 1970
0
A bit old for the schoolboy antics aren't you Phil?
Don't like being proven wrong do you. :)

TonyP.
Quit feeding the fucker.
 
B

Bill Bailley

Jan 1, 1970
0
Quit feeding the f*****.

It is very quiet tonight. Perhaps the "Foul Mouth Police" have severed his
tiny co-ax.
We can only hope.
Bill.
 
Top