RQ said:
Can anyone explain how the sudden and large jolts of electrical power from
braking can be stored in a battery.
In order for meaningful amounts of energy to be converted to actually
stopping a heavy car the electrical jolt must be pretty big.
I have visions of boiling batteries and smoke wires, but of course that
doesn't happen so how does the system handle it.
There are several 'braking' methods with electrical motors. So far people
have responded with a mix of terms, not all of them correct. There are
three principle methods used to 'brake' a system driven by electric motors,
'dynamic braking', 'regenerative braking', and 'reversing or "plugging"'
'Dynamic braking' is the method of using the motor as a generator and
disipating the electrical energy produced in some form of dummy load such as
a resistor bank. When using DC machinery, this is very easy to do. The
armature is disconnected from the power supply and connected to a resistor
bank. The field current can be regulated to control the amount of braking
affect. This method of braking is widely used on diesel-electric railroad
locomotives. The resistor bank is a huge bank mounted inside the roof of
the engine compartment at the back end of the locomotive. Large
radiator-sized fans blow air across the resistor bank to disipate the heat.
Engineers use them when descending long grades rather than burn up the
friction brakes on the wheels.
'Regenerative braking' is very similar, except the electrical energy is not
just dumped to a dummy load. Rather, it is sent back to the power source.
Obviously, the type of power source has to be able to accept the energy.
Secondary cell batteries are one such source, but there are others.
Traction motor railway systems (electric trains) often use regenerative
braking and send the electrical energy back into the grid. Contrary to some
of the ideas posted, DC motors can be shifted from motoring to generating by
simply increasing the field current. No special contactors, or switching is
required, just set the field rheostat to maximum current and regenerative
braking will quickly slow the motor to minimum.
Both of these methods have the disadvantage that no braking force can be
developed until the motor is actually being spun by the load. Once the load
comes to rest, the braking force goes to zero (the motor/generator cannot
develop an electrical output at zero rpm).
'Reversing' (also sometimes known as 'plugging') is a method that can be
used to bring a spinning motor to a dead stop very quickly. This method is
to disconnect the normal supply and reverse the motor connections. Then
briefly reconnect the power supply. Often, the reconnection is controlled
by a small shaft-mounted switch that is driven by a drag-clutch. The moment
the motor speed drops below the switch's threshold or begins to reverse
direction, this 'plug switch' opens and causes the motor controller to
disconnect the power supply. This type of 'braking' can stop the motor
almost as fast as 'starting' can bring it up to speed. I think this is the
type that Roy QT was thinking of when he mentions special equipment
requirements. The current surge when 'plugging' is *higher* than the
starting current. Limitations on duty-cycle and power supply requirements
are usually needed. And even the shaft components can be a problem. I've
seen shaft keys sheared by in-advertant 'plugging'.
Most hybrid vehicles in the news these days use 'regenerative braking',
where the energy is put back into the battery system. Some manufacturers
try to make it sound like a 'major advancement'. But a 1000 kg car,
traveling about 26.8 m/s (about 60 mph) has a total kinetic energy of 359
kJoules of energy (K.E. = 1/2 m* v^2). Thats about 100 kWh. May sound like
a lot, but one gallon of gasoline has about 30480 kWh. So if regenerative
braking is perfect, for each stop from ~60 mph you reclaim the energy of
about 1/2 of a fluid ounce of gasoline (1 1/2 tablespoons).
Hardly seems worth it.
daestrom