That is an astounding case of the Kettle calling the Pot, "black".
You just accused me of "arrogance" for NOT supplying information (on my
application for the requested design) whilst arguing that your own arrogance
is in fact a power to "decide what others should accept or believe", earned
on the basis of what?
You will claim superior knowledge and experience, but YOUR superior
knowledge experience CAN NOT make ME arrogant, and that is by definition.
Quite to the contrary, it makes your statement look arrogant because you
appear to believe that the power to "decide what others should accept or
believe" is something that can be EARNED by superior knowledge and
experience. That is; it exists AS A RIGHT that can be earned.
No doubt this proposition is TRUE inside THIS newsgroup or it may even be
true inside ALL newsgroups, but it is not true in the wider realm of human
relations or the law, because it is in conflict with the basic tenant of an
individuals free will.
In exercising that free will, I have the right NOT to divulge any
information I consider private (or for any other undisclosed reason) and I
will not let you twist the exercise of that option into an allegation of
arrogance, just as you have attempted to do.
To make that accusation under these specific circumstances is an
abomination.
To infer, by the argument that you have made, that the power to "decide what
others should accept or believe" exists at all as a RIGHT, which can be
earned, is an intrinsically arrogant position to take. It is one that
suppresses all decent.
Can you think of anyone in this newsgroup who suppresses all decent?
