S
Scott Stephens
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Mark said:one demand in recompense?
One does not demand extra compensation for being taught a harsh truth;
one rewards it. For best effect, the "reward" must be of the same flavor
as the "lesson", frinst a term in a truly unpleasant prison. That way
the other guy also learns a valuable lesson.
There is some delightful Buddhist proverb about a teacher that burns a
servants dress with a coal, so she can reciprocate by offering him a
coal to light his cigarette. I think it was a kind of metaphor for
justice and reciprocity, IIRC. Perhaps someone will post a link to it,
because I'd like a copy.
being pain in hurt for value?
Sigh. You trust a snake to bite you, not kiss you. The problem is
learning to identify and avoid snakes.
I'm working on defining that better. Predators don't come with warning
labels, and I'm near-sighted anyways. Perhaps I'll post a rule set for
playing corrupt games in corrupt systems I'm working on...
If you simply kill those who offend you, they learn nothing. If you
teach them not to offend, you have added a valuable member to society.
If they prove incapable of learning, a little genetic pool skimming may
be indicated.
There are nuclear, molecular and lattice scale et. et. dynamics at work.
There is a time and place to identify a population as guilty for
harboring criminal beliefs, and inflict collective correction.
Theist and Atheist. Its all the same - Predators and Prey playing silly
name-games.
Deities are, on the whole, infinitely more bloodthirsty than any
mortal could dream of being.
Indeed. In one documentary about 9/11, a priest interviewed said that
when he saw the jet crash into the tower, he knew instantly that
religion was involved, because only religion could motivate man to such
extremes. But unless you believe in deities with independent volition
(angels, demons, ghosts, et.) then you're stuck accepting religion as a
form of philosophy or meme that affects the minds of men. Have
communists been any less successful in brainwashing than any other cult
or religion? When soldiers are put into combat, do the sacrifice
themselves for one another less readily than suicide bombers?
****
My rough outline of a rule-set for sick games (political, religious,
philosophical et.):
division & specialization of labor in a competitive context vs games and
schemes to make others work for you. Industry vs. piracy
(this is a statement of systemic dynamics; not a moral imperative but a
consequence of intelligence, least-action conservation, and tradition -
fundamental identities. The "shoulds" and "aughts" are aesthetic
judgements; our minds recognize patterns and finding it interesting,
tend to think its appropriate, not cognitively dissonant)
Justice - cooperation & competition in a defined, reciprocal context
To the end values are established and promoted (life, flourishing)
Injustice, fraud, deception, cheating, "gaming" system, profiting
individual or gang at expense of system/social order
Examples & instances of cheating encourage others to cheat
Don't be the last one to start looting - you get less, likely to get caught
Kleptocrasy - pervasiveness of cheating based on the motives of game
players;
cheater 1:10, shame on you for cheating;
cheater 1:3 shame on you for getting caught -
Honest people desiring an honest system will find, or contrive reasons
to clean up the corruption and stop cheating. Someone in good faith will
start, others will follow the lead and stop cheating also. Dishonest
people will find excuses to blame others and demand they stop first and
pay, so they can get in the last hit.
Cheaters sanction cheating each other - reciprocity
There are no thieves in a kleptocrasy, just better or worse cheaters
Corrupt systems can't tolerate non-cheaters; they shame the cheaters by
invalidating systemic cheating/deception
Kleptocracies seek to corrupt any players by making dishonesty a
requirement of getting in the game.
If they can't do that, they will cheat and beat on non-cheaters until
becoming embittered and discouraged, their patience with honesty is
depleted, then they can accuse them of cheating and justify cheating them.
Kleptocrasy rule-makers make rule-sets to maintain status quo, increase
power of authority
Just systems put individuals/groups in mutually accountable roles. "I'll
keep you honest, & audit you, you keep me honest and audit me".
Kleptocracies enable corruption: "don't cast stones at me, and I won't
cast stones at you". "Forgive and be forgiven; don't spoil a good thing".
Dynamics of games are non-linear; corruption is path of least action.
having power is path of least action to getting more power, up to limit
cycle where the kleptocrasy disintegrates (loser pulls a gun at the
poker game)
"Stupid", "Good" people willfully refuse to see they are being abused &
cheated, to avoid admission of shame, consequent necessity to either
retaliate (pitifully against overwhelming force results in more
self-harm than enemy-harm), avoidance of motivation to cheat back and
hurt self-esteem, avoidance to realized one's
family/friends/countrymen/world are dirty cheaters. - Ignorance is bliss
when one can believe that existence is not a zero-sum kleptocrasy.
--
Scott
**********************************
DIY Piezo-Gyro, PCB Drill Bot & More Soon!
http://home.comcast.net/~scottxs/
POLITICS, n.
A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
The conduct of public affairs for private advantage. - Ambrose Bierce
**********************************