Re: Getting matching transformer from telephone

  • Thread starter Tomi Holger Engdahl
  • Start date
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Archimedes'= SCHIZOPHRENIC LUNATIC TROLL"


** Go DROP DEAD !!


you VILE TROLLING PIECE OF AUTISTIC SHIT
 
A

Archimedes' Lever

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Floyd LIAR Davidson"


** **** the HELL OFF

you know nothing SEPTIC BLOODY IDIOT !!!





.... Phil
It would be SO nice if Australia wasn't so economically tapped out that
the telco ISPs down there would shitcan a retarded **** like you on the
first complaint.

Damned shame that they are more interested in your money than
curtailing your netwide abuse.
 
A

Archimedes' Lever

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Archimedes'= SCHIZOPHRENIC LUNATIC TROLL"


** Go DROP DEAD !!


you VILE TROLLING PIECE OF AUTISTIC SHIT
Note how the PhilTard resorts to this abuse when he has his inane
remarks refuted by someone.

Is there anyone on the net that you haven't called some lame, PhilTard
name? I doubt it. You are wrong so often that you likely cuss EVERYONE.

You might be a contender for Roy's top spot on the retard list.
 
T

tony sayer

Jan 1, 1970
0
Archimedes' said:
A 10kV arc from a 2MV lightning strike *COULD* make it all the way into
the handset, and OUT of the perforations in the handset, through the
earpiece or mouthpiece, and hit the user. The microphone and the
earpiece transducer both use metal cans, making the distance to the user
a mere 1/4" through air. Not good.

This is ONE of the many reasons that isolation elements are
incorporated at VARIOUS locations in the system. One of which is at the
CABLE connection to the phone itself, which is why isolation elements can
be found at these positions. This is a standard element of device design
where human contact is present, and has nothing to do with it being in a
plastic case. It isn't your Dad's AC fed two wire drill motor with an
un-phased power cord and metal case. It is, however, in close
(electrical) proximity (potentially) with lightning events, and that is
why arresting elements have been incorporated.

Most incorporations are overkill, as it were, but I am happy that our
scientists and engineers of decades past were concerned about such
things.

Idiots today seem to think everything is low voltage and harmless.

Ummmm....

A standard UK BT NTTP socket as used for the UK POTS would have a gas
tube arrestor -across- the line. IIRC there is a centre tapped point
which might be earthed, but in most all cases won't be;-(..

So several miles of OHL and just that and an -out of service- resistor
doesn't seem like much effective protection to what nature can
deliver....
 
T

tony sayer

Jan 1, 1970
0
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrel said:
Which go via optical fibre or microwave link, NOT cable any more.

Graham

More fibre these days, BT seems to be taking their large scale microwave
equipment's out of service very quickly.

They do however in common with other carriers seem to be using microwave
more for last mile applications but for "trunk" applications fibre is
the main or only means of transmission...
 
T

tony sayer

Jan 1, 1970
0
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrel said:
Rather different to 2k I think you'll agree.



Ribbons are FAR lower. Maybe 50 ohms AFTER the transformer !

And Pin 1 on an XLR is ALWAYS the cable shield. It may also be GROUND - but
that's another story. It certainly isn't used to provide phantom power under
ANY circumstances.#


Apart from providing the -return path- for the current sent over the
balanced pair;)...

And the last time I came across a centre tapped transformer
 
T

tony sayer

Jan 1, 1970
0
Paul B said:
Hello Tony and everyone, I am the OP.

I've been away for a few days and I see there's so many posts that
now I'm trying to get through them all!


MY OBJECTIVE

My aim is to take voice recordings made on various equipment and save
them to a PC. Some of the voice recordings are of telephone
conversations made onto tape. I would prefer to have fed the phone
signal direct to the PC but I get a lot of noise.

I want to preserve as much quality as possible because it will
probably be necessary for a third party to identify the person
speaking.

------

Secondly and quite separately from the above....

I didn't raise this problem in my first post. I am getting hum and
noise when I record using a purpose build connector (Retell model 156
~ see link below) to a hand-held battery-powered flash-memory
recorder even when the phone is on hook. I can't see where the hum
is coming from unless it is on the phone line because there can't be
a ground loop this time.

http://www.telephonerecorder.co.uk/recording/connectors/156.htm

I do know my landlines don't have all the hum and noise so they must
be doing something which I want for my recorder! I thought may be a
transformer to better terminate the Virgin Media phone line might
help but I am out of my depth here and line termination may be the
wrong idea altogther.


Interesting that your on VM there shouldn't be any really noticeable
noise with that device from an initial look of it. Any chance of posting
a recording anywhere this might provide an idea of what's up...
DEFINITIONS

I guess my use of the word "matching" is not a very good electrical
description. I'm not seeking to match impedances and I get the
feeling that in electrical engineering, "matching" is often shorthand
for impedence matching. So apologies for any confusion I have
caused.

I want to minimise any ground loop to reduce hum and other spuriae so
perhaps I should have said "isolating" transformer.

Retell have a model (the 157) which connects direct to a PC and I
believe it is identical to the 156 except it has the additional
transformer I am asking about.

That might be wroth a try. On the odd occasion when I've needed to
record a phone call an RS components 1:1 transformer worked very well
'tho I had to pot it down a bit and use a series cap on the input side.
Not exactly strictly tech correct but good enough for purposes..

And that was on a *VM line too....


*Just a note for those not in the UK VM is Virgin Media which is the new
operator for what was/is most of the UK cable companies.

They provide POTS services like BT do but whereas BT will provide
service over up to 7-8 km of copper from an exchange, they tend to use
roadside cabinets, fibre fed using usually Nokia equipment's, with
rarely more than a Kilometre of copper to the subs premises as they only
service urban and sub urban areas..
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Archimedes'= CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATH "


** Report this FUCKING SCUMBAG to his ISP

NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Get the STINKING PIG fucked off usenet for ever.





...... Phil
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Archimedes'= CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATH "


** Report this FUCKING SCUMBAG to his ISP

NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Get the STINKING PIG fucked off usenet for ever.





...... Phil
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Floyd L. Davidson said:
Off hook is a loop *current* condition.

WOW. I'd never have guessed !

Typically a split winding is used, with a mid-point
capacitor to block DC current.

What a load of Bollocks !

Transformers are neither needed nor used any more.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Floyd L. Davidson said:
You have that backwards. If you use a properly designed
pad with the correct impedance it will maximized common
mode rejection of induced currents.

As far as to how using correctly designed pads are
unsafe, I'll pass on that one and let you explain what
you think you are saying. (Because I just can't imagine
how a proper pad, or even an improper one, is unsafe.)

"Howls of derisive laughter" Bruce:

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Floyd L. Davidson said:
You can say anything you like, but when you make up all
the ridiculous garbage you are posting to this thread
there is little doubt that you haven't got even the
faintest clue how telecommuncations equipment works.

Want to to see the schematics ? I'm sure I still have them here
somewhere.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Archimedes' Lever said:
No, I am your superior, and there is nothing that you can do about it,
amp boy.

Proof positive. How's your DSP btw ? Ultra-low noise analogue circuitry,
interfacing one to the other etc ?

Graham
 
T

tony sayer

Jan 1, 1970
0
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrel said:
WOW. I'd never have guessed !



What a load of Bollocks !

Transformers are neither needed nor used any more.

Graham

Umm... beg to differ .. they are used for 2 and 4 wire analogue or
analogue over digital voice band private circuits...

And they do sometimes use DC blocks but rarely now as point to point DC
available paths are rather rare unless on the same ends of the serving
exchange..;)...
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Stuart" <[email protected]>

** Another fucking tenth witted autistic pommy ****.

Did it suggest anything other than that in the given description?


It is always grounded, directly or indirectly, otherwise the screen fails
to be effective.


** More pedantic, pommy fuckwit nonsense.

Screening works even if there is no connection to AC supply ground or
actual ground.


So how does phantom power work then?


** Shame a dumb as dog shit pommy **** like YOU has no fucking clue.

Ain't it - eh ??


Why do you think people such as www.Lundahl.se and others are still
manufacturing and selling them, even introducing new designs.


** Go ask them why - fuckhead.

Such fake arguments ( based on a LACK of evidence) have no logical basis.


At a one-off price of around 20-30 quid they must be manufacturing them in
"quantity"

R.S. Components are a hard-headed, very commercially minded
electrical/electronics distributor, who only stock stuff they can shift in
quantity, yet they still list a centre-tapped primary, microphone
transformer


** Such units are sometimes used in * DI boxes* et alia to receive phantom
power - not deliver it.

Most mic trannys have centre taps on the low Z side - nothing more than an
historical relic.

In an article in Electronics World April 1991, Douglas Self of Soundcraft
stated "It is now rare to use input transformers...." It is clear,
therefore, that they were still being used, even if only in specialist
applications. That is a bare 18 years ago.


** Wot fucking asinine reverse logic drivel.

Doug Self is a smug, pompous idiot - at best.

His hands on experience with any area of pro-audio practice or design is
virtually nil.



...... Phil
 
A

Archimedes' Lever

Jan 1, 1970
0
Ummmm....

A standard UK BT NTTP socket as used for the UK POTS would have a gas
tube arrestor -across- the line. IIRC there is a centre tapped point
which might be earthed, but in most all cases won't be;-(..

So several miles of OHL and just that and an -out of service- resistor
doesn't seem like much effective protection to what nature can
deliver....


You left out the isolation transformer in the phone.

Also, the tube will have a return path, and quell any HV down to
non-arcing voltages.
 
Top