P
Phil Allison
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
"Archimedes'= SCHIZOPHRENIC LUNATIC TROLL"
** Go DROP DEAD !!
you VILE TROLLING PIECE OF AUTISTIC SHIT
** Go DROP DEAD !!
you VILE TROLLING PIECE OF AUTISTIC SHIT
It would be SO nice if Australia wasn't so economically tapped out that"Floyd LIAR Davidson"
** **** the HELL OFF
you know nothing SEPTIC BLOODY IDIOT !!!
.... Phil
Note how the PhilTard resorts to this abuse when he has his inane"Archimedes'= SCHIZOPHRENIC LUNATIC TROLL"
** Go DROP DEAD !!
you VILE TROLLING PIECE OF AUTISTIC SHIT
Archimedes' said:A 10kV arc from a 2MV lightning strike *COULD* make it all the way into
the handset, and OUT of the perforations in the handset, through the
earpiece or mouthpiece, and hit the user. The microphone and the
earpiece transducer both use metal cans, making the distance to the user
a mere 1/4" through air. Not good.
This is ONE of the many reasons that isolation elements are
incorporated at VARIOUS locations in the system. One of which is at the
CABLE connection to the phone itself, which is why isolation elements can
be found at these positions. This is a standard element of device design
where human contact is present, and has nothing to do with it being in a
plastic case. It isn't your Dad's AC fed two wire drill motor with an
un-phased power cord and metal case. It is, however, in close
(electrical) proximity (potentially) with lightning events, and that is
why arresting elements have been incorporated.
Most incorporations are overkill, as it were, but I am happy that our
scientists and engineers of decades past were concerned about such
things.
Idiots today seem to think everything is low voltage and harmless.
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrel said:Which go via optical fibre or microwave link, NOT cable any more.
Graham
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrel said:Rather different to 2k I think you'll agree.
Ribbons are FAR lower. Maybe 50 ohms AFTER the transformer !
And Pin 1 on an XLR is ALWAYS the cable shield. It may also be GROUND - but
that's another story. It certainly isn't used to provide phantom power under
ANY circumstances.#
Paul B said:Hello Tony and everyone, I am the OP.
I've been away for a few days and I see there's so many posts that
now I'm trying to get through them all!
MY OBJECTIVE
My aim is to take voice recordings made on various equipment and save
them to a PC. Some of the voice recordings are of telephone
conversations made onto tape. I would prefer to have fed the phone
signal direct to the PC but I get a lot of noise.
I want to preserve as much quality as possible because it will
probably be necessary for a third party to identify the person
speaking.
------
Secondly and quite separately from the above....
I didn't raise this problem in my first post. I am getting hum and
noise when I record using a purpose build connector (Retell model 156
~ see link below) to a hand-held battery-powered flash-memory
recorder even when the phone is on hook. I can't see where the hum
is coming from unless it is on the phone line because there can't be
a ground loop this time.
http://www.telephonerecorder.co.uk/recording/connectors/156.htm
I do know my landlines don't have all the hum and noise so they must
be doing something which I want for my recorder! I thought may be a
transformer to better terminate the Virgin Media phone line might
help but I am out of my depth here and line termination may be the
wrong idea altogther.
DEFINITIONS
I guess my use of the word "matching" is not a very good electrical
description. I'm not seeking to match impedances and I get the
feeling that in electrical engineering, "matching" is often shorthand
for impedence matching. So apologies for any confusion I have
caused.
I want to minimise any ground loop to reduce hum and other spuriae so
perhaps I should have said "isolating" transformer.
Retell have a model (the 157) which connects direct to a PC and I
believe it is identical to the 156 except it has the additional
transformer I am asking about.
Floyd L. Davidson said:Off hook is a loop *current* condition.
Typically a split winding is used, with a mid-point
capacitor to block DC current.
Floyd L. Davidson said:It has worked for roughly 100 years
Floyd L. Davidson said:You have that backwards. If you use a properly designed
pad with the correct impedance it will maximized common
mode rejection of induced currents.
As far as to how using correctly designed pads are
unsafe, I'll pass on that one and let you explain what
you think you are saying. (Because I just can't imagine
how a proper pad, or even an improper one, is unsafe.)
Floyd L. Davidson said:You can say anything you like, but when you make up all
the ridiculous garbage you are posting to this thread
there is little doubt that you haven't got even the
faintest clue how telecommuncations equipment works.
Floyd L. Davidson said:BS. I had previously discussed it in detail.
Archimedes' Lever said:No, I am your superior, and there is nothing that you can do about it,
amp boy.
Stuart said:45 years ago it certainly was!
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrel said:WOW. I'd never have guessed !
What a load of Bollocks !
Transformers are neither needed nor used any more.
Graham
Did it suggest anything other than that in the given description?
It is always grounded, directly or indirectly, otherwise the screen fails
to be effective.
So how does phantom power work then?
Why do you think people such as www.Lundahl.se and others are still
manufacturing and selling them, even introducing new designs.
At a one-off price of around 20-30 quid they must be manufacturing them in
"quantity"
R.S. Components are a hard-headed, very commercially minded
electrical/electronics distributor, who only stock stuff they can shift in
quantity, yet they still list a centre-tapped primary, microphone
transformer
In an article in Electronics World April 1991, Douglas Self of Soundcraft
stated "It is now rare to use input transformers...." It is clear,
therefore, that they were still being used, even if only in specialist
applications. That is a bare 18 years ago.
Michael A. Terrell said:Here is the donkey's 'Civilized World'
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...999-seven-seconds-alcohol-induced-mayhem.html>
Ummmm....
A standard UK BT NTTP socket as used for the UK POTS would have a gas
tube arrestor -across- the line. IIRC there is a centre tapped point
which might be earthed, but in most all cases won't be;-(..
So several miles of OHL and just that and an -out of service- resistor
doesn't seem like much effective protection to what nature can
deliver....