J
JeffM
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Joerg said:The same that the lawyers make in cases
where someone poured hot coffee over themselves and then sued.
Unfortunately. I don't like it
that people are financially rewarded for their stupidity by a jury
but that's the way it often is right now.
The analogy you're missing is: To test something,
*you* build a system that had probes which had 1000V on them
when 5V would easily do the task
and 700 people who used it told you it was a stupid design.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cach...+reduced-*-*+third-degree-*+above.140.degrees
http://www.google.com/search?q=cach...r-than-140-*-*#Evidence_presented_to_the_jury