Hello,
This is something I've been trying to figure out the logic of.... I'm lost. :-\
There are two additions I'd like to make to a LED chaser similar to those which commonly us a 555 and a 4017. The first is I'd like to make one where each LED slowly fades on and then slowly fades off (without using 20 large caps, which I'm not sure would work anyway). So basically I want the power running along a triangle wave as can be managed with a couple op amps so the LED get .2v up to 3.5v back to .2v and off... gradually. I've got it
The second part (I should probably focus on one thing at a time) would be to add a variable acceleration to the circuit, so that depending on how a given pot is set the pulse width will span perhaps 1 second peak to peak and gradually move faster with each pass. I'm thinking something along the lines of using a second decade counter with different resistances on the output affecting the primary 555's input... Does that make any sense? I think this would work, but is there an easier way?
Thanks,
Christoph
This is something I've been trying to figure out the logic of.... I'm lost. :-\
There are two additions I'd like to make to a LED chaser similar to those which commonly us a 555 and a 4017. The first is I'd like to make one where each LED slowly fades on and then slowly fades off (without using 20 large caps, which I'm not sure would work anyway). So basically I want the power running along a triangle wave as can be managed with a couple op amps so the LED get .2v up to 3.5v back to .2v and off... gradually. I've got it
The second part (I should probably focus on one thing at a time) would be to add a variable acceleration to the circuit, so that depending on how a given pot is set the pulse width will span perhaps 1 second peak to peak and gradually move faster with each pass. I'm thinking something along the lines of using a second decade counter with different resistances on the output affecting the primary 555's input... Does that make any sense? I think this would work, but is there an easier way?
Thanks,
Christoph