J
John
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
John said:
DalienX said:seen something like this elsewhere, the only thing that worries me is
woods lack of earthing ablility.
SG1 said:That's what people are for????????
Wood will conduct lightning!, what are you
worried about!!.
The said:Actually, wood doesn't.
The said:Actually, wood doesn't.
Put enough volts across it and it certainly will.
The Real Andy said:Its not the wood thats doing the conducting.
The said:Its not the wood thats doing the conducting.
The said:Its not the wood thats doing the conducting.
DalienX said:seen something like this elsewhere, the only thing that worries me is
woods lack of earthing ablility.
Rod Speed said:Yes it is.
You'll find it was the water that was the conductor, not simply the wood.
Rod Speed said:wood.
Wrong with dry wood.
Dry wood is an insulator - not a conductor.
For the purpose of earthing - which is where this started,
wood has NO conducive conductive abilities.
Oh, I'm sorry, it must be the carbon ions forming
a conductive plasma as the cellulose is explosively
vapourised.Either you know something about dielectric
physics you aren't telling us or you are being a
nitpicking dickhead.
FruitLoop said:Lets see , Carbon is used in low voltage batteries , wow with only 1.5
volts
present . TTL is 5 volts .
Man , now Im worried !!!
Rod Speed said:Depends entirely on the level of voltage
applied, just like with any insulator.
Irrelevant to where it diverged to.
Pity about the situation that it diverged to.
Colin ® said:<NITPICK>
And you should be. Carbon is used in some cells. With carbon/zinc or
alkaline you get the 1.5 V you sprout about.
A battery is a number of cells connected in series and / or parallel
How you manage to get from the voltage of a lightning strike to a
carbon/zinc cell is quite a step.
</NITPICK>
ps still think a file is created when cloning a disk ???