C
Colin ®
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
FruitLoop said:Its an option
That you had it completely wrong is immutable fact - not an option.
FruitLoop said:Its an option
Colin ® said:That you had it completely wrong is immutable fact - not an option.
Yes it is.
So pray tell what it is that does the conducting?
And don't say electrons, because by that logic metals wouldn't be
considered conductors.
Me thinks you should go back to physics and chem 101. Or maybe better,
go back and start in say... year 10 or 11.
Bryan
Well in the context of grounding a laptop,
wood is useless and would act as an insulator.
In the context of the 'bandstand' incident,
water was the conductor - NOT wood.
In both instatnces wood was/is not a conductor.
Somehow we diverged to the Geelong incident. The lightning
was conducted by water from the thunderstorm - not the wood.
Which was the situation where water was the
main conductive substance - NOT the wood.
You said wood was doing the conducting - it wasn't.
It is if the wood is wet. Take a look at any photo of a lab strike to
a dry peice of timber. The lighning travels around the outside of the
timber. Put a piece of plastic next to the piece of wood, and the
plastic will also produce the same effect. I beleive the term is
called flashover. The same phenomena affects ceramic insulators.
In Law Enforcement an image or clone file
is created FYI .
Its an exact sector copy of the entire hard drive and
there are loads of 3rd party apps that do the same and
reproduce this on an identical physical or logical drive .
How did I have it wrong ? ,
I think your wrong in your conclusions .
Have another go on this most basic of topics .
Irrelevant to the general question about whether
wood, like any insulator CAN BE a conductor.
The said:I thought air was a good insulator too. How does ligning travel
through air? I beleive the term is called ionisation.
The said:The point being dickhead? Its not the material that is conducting the
lightning, it is only assisting it. It is ionised air that conducts.
So the answer is no, the wood is not conducting electricity.
Mark said:Here: http://wvlightning.com/trees.shtml
"Electricity seeks the path of least resistance, and the moisture (sap
and water) inside a tree is a much better conductor than air. The
result: a tree provides a preferred path for lightning to reach ground."
Now for the trick question: what contains the sap and moisture?
The answer starts with a "w" and ends with a "d" and has four letters.
Rod Speed said:No such animal.
You claimed that an image file is always involved. You are wrong.
Bazil said:I was gunna opt out of this thread but I have to clarify a point or two.
The people under the bandstand were covered by the roof. Now it may have
been that the strike ionised the air all around, and inside, but I
guarantee that the wooden structure (mostly dry - it had a roof
remember) was also a path.
Have you ever seen a large tree split in half by lightning? What has
happened? Think about what forces are occurring in that tree to
literally blow it apart. What is it that has passed through the wood, to
cause, I assume, a large build up of gas?
I get the feeling that a few otherwise intelligent engineers, techs etc,
don't quite appreciate just how powerful lightning is...
The point being dickhead? Its not the material that
is conducting the lightning, it is only assisting it.
It is ionised air that conducts.
So the answer is no, the wood is not conducting electricity.
Check out * encase * dickhead .
Its the only software used in courts in the US .
Its an option
and it * depends * on the software used .
You only use True Image ,
sure its does on the fly cloning
but thats only one small option for cloning drives ,
there are 50 products out there
Duh.
and your speaking about 1 thats not used by the professionals .
Why take an image if its not a backup and repeatable on the deployment .
Also a file is much easier to audit for backup
retrieval, rather than a physical drive.
This argument is typical homeboy stuff.
Rod Speed said:The thread had diverged from that.
Irrelevant to the general question about whether
wood, like any insulator CAN BE a conductor.
Irrelevant to the general question about whether
wood, like any insulator CAN BE a conductor.
Irrelevant to the general question about whether
wood, like any insulator CAN BE a conductor.
Irrelevant to the general question about whether
wood, like any insulator CAN BE a conductor.
Here: http://wvlightning.com/trees.shtml
"Electricity seeks the path of least resistance, and the moisture (sap
and water) inside a tree is a much better conductor than air. The
result: a tree provides a preferred path for lightning to reach ground."
Now for the trick question: what contains the sap and moisture?
The answer starts with a "w" and ends with a "d" and has four letters.
I expect you'll now try to play with definitions about wood moisture
content or something.
I was gunna opt out of this thread but I have to clarify a point or two.
The people under the bandstand were covered by the roof. Now it may have
been that the strike ionised the air all around, and inside, but I
guarantee that the wooden structure (mostly dry - it had a roof
remember) was also a path.
Have you ever seen a large tree split in half by lightning? What has
happened? Think about what forces are occurring in that tree to
literally blow it apart. What is it that has passed through the wood, to
cause, I assume, a large build up of gas?
I get the feeling that a few otherwise intelligent engineers, techs etc,
don't quite appreciate just how powerful lightning is...
The said:I beleive i have already quoted elsewhere a 'dry' piece of timber. I
beleive that the article you suggest also specifies 'sap and water'?
BTW. I have seen the results of dry, seasoned timber in lab lightning
tests. I can assure you that a 'dry' peice of timber will not conduct
any better than a piece of ceramic.
Plenty of dry wood in a thunderstorm.