J
John
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
John said:
They're pretty pricey too
John said:
Plenty of dry wood in a thunderstorm.
Rod Speed said:There can be plenty of dry wood between metal
that gets the strike and the ground in buildings etc.
Doesn't mean it becomes a conductor.
For instance ionisation will bridge the gap and the wood simply burns because
of the temperatures involved with a strike.
Rod Speed said:water'?
Wrong, as always.
Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about anything at all, ever.
No wonder you only ever get to crash cars.
They're pretty pricey too
At least * HE CAN * . You probably dont have a licence due to being
suspended or failing the initial test .
I take it your jealous of people who drive cars . Just shows again your
either a liar ( having never stacked or scratched a car ) or dont drive
enough or have the exposure to be involved in a accident whether it was
caused by you or the other person.
The other possiblity is your 15 years old and going by your posts thats even
a bit old .
Rod said:Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind
just the pathetic excuse for a troll that
any 2 year old could leave for dead.
When I see this standard canned message,
I always get a mental picture of some hapless fool
hiding behind a PC as the whistle of large bore
mortar rounds (usenet postings) falls all around
them as they wonder "What the F*&% did I do to
deserve this?".
Rod Speed said:Irrelevant to the general question about whether
wood, like any insulator CAN BE a conductor.
FruitLoop said:At least * HE CAN * . You probably dont have a licence due to being
suspended or failing the initial test .
I take it your jealous of people who drive cars . Just shows again your
either a liar ( having never stacked or scratched a car ) or dont drive
enough or have the exposure to be involved in a accident whether it was
caused by you or the other person.
The other possiblity is your 15 years old and going by your posts thats
even
a bit old .
The Real Andy said:What amuses me, is that it bears an uncanny resemblance to a guy i
used to work with called greg. I often wonder....
Especially if it is "double-wooded".McGrath said:Sorry mate, but that 'general question' was never part of the thread.
It's simple. In this context of this thread, wood is NOT a conductor.
Sorry mate, but that 'general question' was never part of the thread.
It's simple. In this context of this thread, wood is NOT a conductor.
Wrong, as always. It became part of the thread when you
made a spectacular fool of yourself when you claimed that
it wasnt the wood that conducted. Sometimes it is indeed.
Wrong, as always. Just like with ANY conductor, its ALWAYS
possible to exceed the breakdown voltage and get it to conduct.
Most obviously when the wood isnt that thick and you have the
lightning hitting metal on the weather side, and then the wood
CAN break down even when it isnt wet.
The said:The only time this can happen is when there is no possible way for the
lightning to find ground. What happens in this situation is that it
usually 'punches' or burns a hole in the material. Once again, the
material itself is not doing the conducting.
Lightning still follows the path of least resistance, and considering
that air breaks down at a much lower voltage than timber, the air will
always win.
The only time this can happen is when there is
no possible way for the lightning to find ground.
What happens in this situation is that it usually
'punches' or burns a hole in the material. Once
again, the material itself is not doing the conducting.
Lightning still follows the path of least resistance,
and considering that air breaks down at a much
lower voltage than timber, the air will always win.
Rod Speed said:Wrong, as always. It became part of the thread when you
made a spectacular fool of yourself when you claimed that
it wasnt the wood that conducted. Sometimes it is indeed.