Jump to content
Electronics-Lab.com Community

indulis

Members
  • Posts

    488
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by indulis

  1. A correction is needed to my explanation above (thanks to Zeppelin who caught it), heat sinks are rated in degrees C per watt, not he other way around.

    Heat sink and component surfaces are not perfectly flat or smooth. To maximize surface area contact, you want to fill all those imperfection with some thermally conductive material. It can be thermal grease, sil pads, gap fillers... etc. The point is to lower the thermal resistance as much as possible. In some cases (in the SMT world),  ceramic substrates are used, or even copper clad aluminum instead of the "old" G10, FR4... etc.

  2. A "google search" for heat sinks will show you all the different sizes and shapes.

    Heat sinks are rated in watts/degrees... in other words, a heat sink can dissipate a certain amount of watts and only increase in temperature so may degrees.

    Say you had a MOSFET with 10 mOhms on resistance. You push 100A thru it so the MOSFET dissipates (I^2*R) 100 watts. Now, say the MOSFET manufacturer says the the thermal resistance is 2 degrees/watt junction to tab (we'll say it a TO-220 case), so that means the the tab will rise 200 degrees (that's above ambient, and this hot is a bad thing). But they also tell you if you have the device on a heat sink rated xx degrees/watt the thermal resistance is now .5 degrees so the temperature now will rise only 50 degrees above ambient (this is better and a good thing). In general you don't want junction temperatures to go above 150

  3. Heat sinks is better lumped into Physics than electronics. Basicaly there are 3 ways to transfer heat, conduction, convection and radiation. The most effective of these is conduction. Metal/s, conducts heat a lot better than air. The magic is in in the amount of surface area exposed to the air (that's why you have all those fin's...

  4. Not true...

    For iron core transformers...

    The voltage equation is

    V=4*F*f*a*N*B*10^-8

    Where:
    V is the voltage across the winding
    F is form factor (1.11 for AC)
    f is the frequency
    a is the cross sectional area (cm^2)
    N is the number of turns
    B is the flux density (gauss)


    The power equation is

    P=.707*J*f*W*a*B*10^-8

    P is power (VA)
    J is current density of the transformer (amp/cm^2)
    W is area of core window (cm^2)


    What this tells you is that the size does matter, and the variables are the cross sectional area and the window area.


  5. This is a linear sine-wave inverter and it wastes a lot of power and its output Mosfets get extremely hot because they conduct a high current all the time.


    Did you consider that the MOSFETS run for a long time in their "Ohmic Region" as the cause of them getting hot?

    Since the current, like the voltage, is a sinusoid, at "crossover", the MOSFET's shouldn't  be conducting any current at all.



    All opamp circuits need a DC reference voltage. This one is half the supply voltage.


    As a general statment, that's a little misleading to those that aren't familar with op-amp circuits. Yes a reference is chosen, but it can also be ground just as easly as a DC... or for that matter, an AC signal.
  6. Any number of resistors of the same value in parallel is equal to the resistor value divided by the number of resistors, it's not just limited too 2... i.e. 10, 100ohm resisistors in parallel is 100/10=10ohms... it's one of those things that works out that way given certain conditions.

    The equation for any values in parallel is Rval= 1/ (1/R1+1/R2...1/Rn). I suppose you could algebraically manipulate the equation to get Rval=R1/n when R1=R2=R3... if you wanted to really prove it to yourself.

  7. Prior to the current limit threshold, U3 is "acting" like a comparator, sitting at the positive rail waiting for the voltage across R7 to increase. Unless someone wanted to use the supply as a "regulated current source" whiles it's in current limit, does current regulation matter?? Not that it isn't a good idea, but I can't think of a reason why a "typical hobbyist" would care.

  8. Actually, wire wound resistors do have inductance. As far a wire, it's about 20nH/inch.

    Yup... zero ohm jumpers can be/are used for configuring different options. They are also used a as "bridge". When you have to keep cost's down, manufacturers use them to avoid having to go to a double sided PCB. A few "jumpers" are a LOT cheaper than drilled plated via's on a multi-layer PCB (as in double sided and up).

  9. at present i am applying a triangular drive pulse to the gate VGS but my current ID , the drain current is not following that waveform.
    the control voltage i am applying is only 0-5 V .


    If you have a triangular waveform already, why not just apply it directly to a resistor? That will give you your triangular current waveform. If you need more power, apply the signal to the resistor with a emitter follower.

    My main requirement is to produce a current pulse of a high rating


    A triangular waveform is not a pulse. Which do you need?

    in my circuit this triangular current pulse would be utilised by a EDMT machine


    What is a EDMT machine?
  10. The TL081 and TL071 and many other opamps oscillate with the small capacitance of shielded cable connected directly to their output.


    Where is there "shielded cable" connected to the output of U2?? QUANTIFY the amount of capacitance it would take to make U2 possibly oscillate, and why that would happen given C9 is in the circuit??  In this configuration it's some sort of gain limited integrator in combination with R15, Q2 b-e, R16, R12/C6 and R11... I don't suppose you have worked out the transfer function??

    D10 would be reversed biased if it tried to discharge the output capacitor.


    If Q1 turns on, for whatever reason and there had been a voltage at the output, D10 is now forward biased, and C1 is discharged via D10, R15 and Q1.

    If the project tried to go quickly to a low voltage then the emitter-base junction of Q2 would break down at a reverse bias of about 6V.


    How fast can you turn the knob? Something tells me that transient response of this supply isn't all that good!! besides, R16 would do the same thing.
  11. R9 feeds the adjusted reference voltage to U2 and limits the loading effect of C4 on the output of U3. If its value is higher then U2 might pickup interference. If its value is lower then U3 might oscillate due to C4 being at its output or R9 won't discharge C4 quick enough during current limiting.


    C4 has NO affect on U3 until you hit current limit, at which point U3 turns on just hard enough to reduce (clamp) the voltage at U2-pin3 such that the drop across R7 becomes small enough to "release" U3. Having R9 will slow down the discharge of C4, not speed it up. Until you hit current limit, U3's output is at the positive rail... so it will not oscillate. In the end R9 doesn't really do much...


    It is a supply bypass capacitor for high frequencies, because C1 is so big it has high inductance. Analog electronic circuits oscillate without it or if its value is too low.


    C1 has a large ESR (good for killing Q) but high ESL at line frequencies (60/120 Hz)??


    Yes, because Q2 and Q4 are in its negative feedback loop and are much slower than U2 and cause delay, the combination could oscillate without C9.


    C9 IS part of the feedback loop.


    U2 oscillates if its load is capacitive and is directly at its output. R15 isolates the capacitance of Q2 and I recommend reducing its value to 100 ohms.


    U2 can't drive a transistor?? It's junction capacitance is so large that U2 will oscillate? R15 is there to limit the current through Q1 when it has to discharge (via D10) the ouput capacitor (and  load cap, if any).
×
  • Create New...