If you have a scenario where there is a cable (which cannot be shortened) between a battery and a circuit, is it better to have electrolytic capacitors or a super capacitor on the circuit input to help with transient demands from the circuit?
Neither. Your scenario sucks.If you have a scenario where there is a cable (which cannot be shortened) between a battery and a circuit, is it better to have electrolytic capacitors or a super capacitor
(Strike one).The capacitor acts as a short circuit when it is discharged .If you have a scenario where there is a cable (which cannot be shortened) between a battery and a circuit
Same same..... also depends on the power requirements and the circuit in question.electrolytic capacitors or a super capacitor
This is nonsense:Neither. Your scenario sucks.
No, it s not. From Wikipedia (link):A super capacitor is just an electrolytic capacitor designed to have a very high capacitance.
Unlike ordinary capacitors, supercapacitors do not use the conventional solid dielectric, but rather, they use electrostatic double-layer capacitance and electrochemical pseudocapacitance,[3] both of which contribute to the total capacitance of the capacitor.
Wikipedia only mentions about the making of a super capacitor. It does not say that it is not a Electrolytic capacitor.No, it s not. From Wikipedia (link):
Capacitors store electrostatic energy...E=CV squared÷2.This is nonsense
Right.For a capacitor a instantaneous changing voltage dt=0 requires an infinite current
So yes, using decoupling capacitors explicitly for the purpose stated is good practice."Good Practice" in electrical engineering states, this cannot be achieved.
One may have to search and read a bit further. An electrolytic capacitor stores energy in the form of opposing charges across a dielectric, typically aluminum oxide (tantalum or niobium based electrolytic capacitors are also well known and work by the same principle).Wikipedia only mentions about the making of a super capacitor. It does not say that it is not a Electrolytic capacitor.