I'm witchya on that. I was just curious as to what Allan meant.
A lot of times clients *think* they want some feature and then end up never
ever never using it.
|I can't think of any, each panel has its own strengths and weaknesses
| however Ademco is far easier to program
|
| | > Like what features?
| >
| >
| > | > | Ademco might be easier to program, but the Napco is so much more
| > versatile.
| > | More features make for more programming. As for me, I would rather be
| > able
| > | to configure a panel the way my customer wants to use it than be held
to
| a
| > | more restricted panel.
| > |
| > | | > | > Ademco is not a large percentage of my installs...and ya know I've
| never
| > | > really had problems with their stuff..at least the few models that I
| do
| > | > use.
| > | >
| > | > But having said that...at least Ademco stuff easier to program than
| > | > NappyKO
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > As far as programming goes though, nothing beats DMP for ease of
| > | > programming...sheesh it's like using an ATM machine just answer
| > questions
| > | > in
| > | > english. Panel of choice for this AARP installer.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > | > | > | That's what you get for installing Ademcrap.....
) hee hee
| > | > |
| > | > | | > | > | >I agree. I've been doing this stuff for almost 25 years and
| sometimes
| > I
| > | > | >have
| > | > | > to read the manual over and over again...and then STILL have to
| call
| > | > tech
| > | > | > support --- who speak with a decidely off-shore accent. Its
| > | > frustrating
| > | > at
| > | > | > times, but its good when you get it right.
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > | > | > | > | > |
| message
| > | > | > | | > | > | > | > Yep they do, and you have to speak Alarmish, a sub-dialect
of
| > | > 'Glish.
| > | > | > | > They're not written for DIYers.
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | They are not written for anybody who knows how to read and
also
| > | > trusts
| > | > | > what
| > | > | > | they read:
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | Installer code
| > | > | > | User code
| > | > | > | Default code
| > | > | > | Master code
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | In the manuals that I am trying to read, all of the above
appear
| > | > with
| > | > no
| > | > | > | definitions and are obviously used inappropriately, in some
| cases.
| > | > | > Trying
| > | > | > | to program something as simple as time and date becomes a
| > | > mind-bending
| > | > | > | experience. Not because it needs to be ... it's because the
| hacks
| > | > who
| > | > | > wrote
| > | > | > | the manuals don't themselves understand the terms that they
are
| > | > using,
| > | > | > or
| > | > | > | perhaps are semi-clever agents dedicated to the demise of
DIYs.
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | I used to think this sort of thing was only endemic among
| offshore
| > | > | > products
| > | > | > | designed and built by other than English speaking engineers.
| Now,
| > I
| > | > | > have
| > | > | > a
| > | > | > | whole new perspective on this issue.
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | I know, I know ... this "stuff" is intended for professional
| > | > installers
| > | > | > and
| > | > | > | they just enjoy the hell out of DIYs hanging out here,
twisting
| in
| > | > the
| > | > | > wind.
| > | > | > | My tenacity will prevail, in any case.
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | Maybe I'll put up a website and further illuminate this
| extremely
| > | > dark
| > | > | > | corridor of consumer electronics in the good ole yew ess of
aay.
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > |
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|
