Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?

[macbook]

Not only is translating historical text problamatic and by far "perfect",
there are also other factors involved that keep the history from being perfect.

Take for instance the Byzantine Empire. Considering it's proof that
it's the final the collapse of the modified christian roman empire and
that for some reason the christan history books somehow underplay that
Muslim VS Orthodox christian Byzantine ending with the Muslims winning
and taking over the Sophia shrine... Somehow christians are led to
believe that rome/byzantine fell under a great mystery.
Er... no the Muslims conquered Constantinople that was currenly the
east Roman empire. If you look at this event it's clear to see that the
History books in Christian world see it has a blow to a single city or
avoid the whole issue. Muslim history sees it has a great victory over
the crusades and orthodox christians.

 

[Tom]

Idiot.

No one repeats himself.

 

[Tom]

Idiot.

No one repeats himself.

 

[Tom]

Idiot, and documented liar.

It's your insistence on that sort of nonsense that keeps you from being
taken seriously.

 

[Tom]

Idiot.

You already did that one. Have you run out of mudballs already?

 

[Tom]

His point was clear enough, as is the fact that you lied about what he
said.

His point is clear to no one.

 

[Tom]

In News [email protected],, Tom at
[email protected], typed this:


It doesn't seem that you have. Try harder.

Does that mean you either can't or won't clearly restate your point about
fossils?

 

[No One]

No One wrote, On 1/11/2008 2:59 AM:

You have nothing substantial to add, then attempt to blame someone else
for your own lack of a sufficient response. Notice also that you say,
"there's nothing else to say about someone. . ." In other words, you
have ceased even attempting to make your brain function, and have run
out of personal insults.

Out of you, Tom and I, I'm the only person who posted anything
substantive. I then wrote you too morons off as you have nothing
to say except beyond some religion-motivated nonsense.

Both of you are idiots - it is not a "personal insult" but a statement
of fact given the nonsense you two post.

 

[No One]

No one repeats himself.

Idiot.

 

[No One]

It's your insistence on that sort of nonsense that keeps you from being
taken seriously.

ROTFLMAO. Nobody takes an idiot like you seriously. I cetainly don't.

 

[No One]

You already did that one. Have you run out of mudballs already?

Idiot.

 

[No One]

His point is clear to no one.

Not true unless you change your capitalization.

 

[No One]

No one repeats himself.

Idiot.

 

[Meltdarok]

No One wrote, On 1/11/2008 1:26 PM:

Out of you, Tom and I, I'm the only person who posted anything
substantive. I then wrote you too morons off as you have nothing
to say except beyond some religion-motivated nonsense.

Both of you are idiots - it is not a "personal insult" but a statement
of fact given the nonsense you two post.

You've obviously given up trying to think.
Have a nice life be that as it may.

 

[David Morgan \(MAMS\)]

Not only is translating historical text problamatic and by far "perfect",
there are also other factors involved that keep the history from being perfect.

To insinuate that *any* text with no known originals would remain true to
the time period of 1,600 years (and earlier) prior to it's inception is absurd.

KJV was assembled from 1601 to 1611 (IIRC) and since that time has
undergone several several major revisions. "The New International Version"
of the Bible is a mockery of the original content.... so how can anyone
actually believe that during the assembly of the KJV and given the alterations
that have occurred in just the past 400 years, that anything which was allegedly
written from 1400 years (to unknown ages preceeding the alleged life and times
of the Christ) possibly be expected to retain it's integrity until 1600?

 

[Tom]

ROTFLMAO. Nobody takes an idiot like you seriously. I cetainly don't.

No one does not take me seriously.

 

[Tom]

Idiot.

Apparently you have.

 

[Tom]

Not true unless you change your capitalization.

No one thinks truth hinges on capitalization.

 

[Tom]

Out of you, Tom and I, I'm the only person who posted anything
substantive. I then wrote you too morons off as you have nothing
to say except beyond some religion-motivated nonsense.

Idiot.

 

[Tom]

Idiot.

No one repeats himself.