Simulation Program

A

Active8

Jan 1, 1970
0
I read in sci.electronics.design that John Boy


SuperSpice doesn't normally suffer from such extreme speed problems. It
sounds as if something else on your machine is taking exception to it.
that's what i was thinking. i've seen old winders 98 boxes do that kind
of stuff, but i think OP might be exaggerating a bit.

in case anyone want's to stop guessing and start researching (this only
took me about 15 sec which isn't shit compared to the time already spent
bitching,) here's the whois info from sam spade via magic.

note: OP is [email protected] (John Boy)

hard to say where it came from because it appears to have been posted
through google

NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.157.126.202

that an IP addy from a block owned by Bell South

[ where have i heard the name nigel smith before? ]


Registrant:
Island Logix, Inc. (ISLANDLOGIX-DOM)
P.O. Box 157
Waukegan, IL 60079
US

Domain Name: ISLANDLOGIX.COM

Administrative Contact:
Smith, Nigel (NS6526) [email protected]
Island Logix Inc
PO BOX 157
WAUKEGAN, IL 60079-0157
US
(708) 360-0458
Technical Contact:
Esquibel, Bruce (BE8) [email protected]
3163 N. Clybourn Ave.
Chicago, IL 60618
US
773-477-6210 fax: 123 123 1234

Record expires on 01-Mar-2004.
Record created on 15-Oct-2002.
Database last updated on 19-Oct-2003 17:09:25 EDT.
 
A

Active8

Jan 1, 1970
0
Finally, as for the guy who stated that 'all SPICEs are the same at their
core anyway' -- that's probably quite true of the many SPICE packages that
just wrap a GUI around the Berkeley core, but what you're paying for with
the likes of SIMetrix and SuperSPICE are guys who understand how the
Berkeley core works _and have made extensive modifications to it_ to support
better performance, convergence, etc. Not to mention bug-proofing --
there's a lot of academic code out there that's choke full of bugs due to
the people writing it knowing that (1) they'd probably never get any credit
for making it rock solid anyway and (2) that thesis deadline was coming up
awfully fast...
actually, there was a recent post in the CAD NG IIRC, where it was
mentioned that not all sims run the same in different Spices. IIRC, Mike
E mentioned that he receives spice decks in his email with examples of
this.

FWIW,
mike
 
C

Chaos Master

Jan 1, 1970
0
John Boy engraved with a +2 athame:
Oh a signature, is that what it is. I thought it was just a slick way
of freely advertizing his program (SPAM). And I already told you that
is not my program. Are you brain dead?

It's not program, but it looks like islandlogics is paying you to do that.
Even if I was SPAMMING what are you gonna do about it?

Report to Google.
If you think I'm gonna send you my companies schematics you better
think again.


No need to send a company schematic. Send me a ***example*** of a simulation
from your program.
Sounds like SPAM to me, did you write SIMetrix and is SPAMMING it now?
well, probably not you are too stupid to write even a "Hello World"
program.

No.
 
C

Chaos Master

Jan 1, 1970
0
Active8 engraved with a +2 athame:
in case anyone want's to stop guessing and start researching (this only
took me about 15 sec which isn't shit compared to the time already spent
bitching,) here's the whois info from sam spade via magic.

note: OP is [email protected] (John Boy)

hard to say where it came from because it appears to have been posted
through google

NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.157.126.202

Report to [email protected].


At my freebsd shell(m-net.arbornet.org) I ran nslookup and got this, if it's
useful:

bash-2.05a$ nslookup
Default Server: dns.wwnet.net
Address: 209.142.193.2
68.157.126.202
Server: dns.wwnet.net
Address: 209.142.193.2

Name: adsl-068-157-126-202.sip.mia.bellsouth.net
Address: 68.157.126.202
 
K

Ken Smith

Jan 1, 1970
0
John Boy said:
Programs out there with zero bugs raise your hands....

At least four of mine just raised their hands.

Only in the Microsoft era did it become OK to have bugs in a program. How
many people hear would get on an airplane controlled by MS windows
programs?

Those who figure it is safe because it will never get airborn don't
count.
 
A

Active8

Jan 1, 1970
0
in case anyone want's to stop guessing and start researching (this only
took me about 15 sec which isn't shit compared to the time already spent
bitching,) here's the whois info from sam spade via magic.

note: OP is [email protected] (John Boy)

hard to say where it came from because it appears to have been posted
through google

NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.157.126.202

Report to [email protected].[/QUOTE]

there's an idea.

he's not bothering me yet, but he's already in at least one kill
file/bozo bin.

i did the lookup to get a clue as to whether he was the software author.
the domain registrant is Islandlogix, Inc. and the contact is Nigel
Smith which rings a bell.

coincidentally, OPs email addy has "smith" in it.
At my freebsd shell(m-net.arbornet.org) I ran nslookup and got this, if it's
useful:

bash-2.05a$ nslookup
Default Server: dns.wwnet.net
Address: 209.142.193.2

Server: dns.wwnet.net
Address: 209.142.193.2

Name: adsl-068-157-126-202.sip.mia.bellsouth.net
Address: 68.157.126.202

hmmm... asymetric DSL

like i said, i think he posted through google

Organization: http://groups.google.com
although if i put my company name in my news client, *it* shows up as
"Organization"

and i'm thinking his ISP is Bell South

which is what you got out of your most excellent free shell. i was going
to say OS but i went to m-net.arbornet.org and figured it out.

uh, "athame" isn't in webster's. care to elucidate me? sounds like a #2
pencil.

brs,
mike
 
K

Kevin Aylward

Jan 1, 1970
0
John said:
I WAS responding to another post about VS, but their post was over a
month old so I had to start a new thread.

Personally I dont want to argue about stupid spice programs, you
people use anything you want, what do I care. All I did was post an
opinion, yes I admit it did sound like SPAM, so what, maybe they'll
give me a commission for it ;) I need the money for a new computer
anyway.



Is that SPAM?

Of course not, you invited a response by posting in ther first place.
Spam is unsolicited:)
Using every excuse to push your product while bashing
competing products. But I cant blame you, it's just marketing right?
he he he.

Indeed.


I design circuits for a living also, but I dont have 20 years
experience, why do I need it, I'm not designing with vacuum tubes.
Typical engineer thinks he knows more than everybody else, and only
his opinion is the right one.
Indeed.


Of course YOUR program is the ONLY usable program in the world.

No. I think PSpice is reasonable, just too expensive. I also think
Cadence Analog Artist is pretty good. LTSpice is also usable, but a bit
too cryptic for me, but for personal use, on limited funds, if SS didn't
exist, it would be a contender. However, EWB/CM/VS etc are all quite
useless, in my view.
But I
tried yours and I couldnt get it to do anything because it was too
slow even if it was the only thing running.

What system are you using? I admit that it is thirsty resource wise. You
want at least 256M and > 400Mhz uP. I use it with a 1Ghz with 512M, and
I don't notice any problems in GUI speed at all. Note that anything
below XP/NT is crap.
Honest bible truth, I clicked on a menu item in SuperSpice and it took
like a minute before the menu poped up. The hard drive started going
like mad each time I tried to pick something from the menu. Are you
creating the menu in real-time on the fly each time you try to click
on it? why?

Nope. As noted above, I don't have this problem on my system, and I
don't get many complaints on this, if any. When was the last time you
defragged?

As noted above, are you running XP/NT, if not. Do so. Anything else, is
not viable today. Systems below this have a total GUI resource limit of
64k for all processes running.
I had to start plannng ahead of time what menu item I'm gonna click
next because if I made a mistake I would have to go eat a sandwich
while waiting for the correct menu to come up. It reminded me of the
time I tried using the Protel demo, unbelivable, you need a 3Gz
machine for that thing.

There is obviously something not right in the system set-up.
But SuperSpice could be a nice program, but I could not give it a
good try because of the speed problem. If you get that fixed maybe I
could try it again. It looks identical to VS, so maybe it's good.

It works way better than VS, and is no way identical. It is designed for
real work. Once you can actually run it ok on a decent set-up system, it
will be plainly apparent.
I
think you programmers are copying each other.

Wow no way, but a windows GUI, by its nature has similar features. I had
never even heard of VS, when I started SS. I was aware of its crap
precursor though.
I tried Electronic Workbench, forget that one, you need a 3Gz dual
processor machine to boot that one up.

Rubbish. EWB technically runs fine on most systems. Its crap in actual
use though.
PSPICE was ok but I gotta run
three programs to get a simulation.

Its a bit messy, but not a big issue.
CircuitMaker was ok, but the
interface was clunky old pre Windows 3.1 style and cost $1000. Beige
Bag B2 Spice was ok but clunky interface also.

They are all basically the same under the hood, because they all use
the exact same SPICE engine from berkeley and then add some fluff to
"pretty it up". Then charge you a lot of money depending on how pretty
it is.

Simetrix has extensively modified core code, so they are not all the
same.

I don't actually charge for my port of the engine itself. You can use
the demo installed engine standalone, with unrestricted features, with
text input and output.

Ah... I have now read the next post by Active8, and it does seem that
indeed you are a spamer from Island logic, the vendor of VS.
Interestingly, the first time I tried VS, it failed by using up all GUI
resources because of all those bloody GUI buttoned toolbars.

Kevin Aylward
[email protected]
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
 
J

John Boy

Jan 1, 1970
0
[.. about some lamer spice thingy ..]
Programs out there with zero bugs raise your hands....

At least four of mine just raised their hands.


Please post your bug free programs. If each of your programs are not
at least 2MB exe file dynamically linked, then dont bother posting it.
Anybody can write a bug free "hello world" program.

Only in the Microsoft era did it become OK to have bugs in a program. How
many people hear would get on an airplane controlled by MS windows
programs?


Windows OS controlling a plane, yea right, funniest thing I ever
heard. You should think about doing stand up comedy.
 
J

John Boy

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hey, I'm still waiting for people like FRED BLOGGS and CHAOS MASTER to
post their wonderful software here so that we can see how it's
"supposed" to be done since they know everything, and so quick to
curse and beat down.

Come on guys, post your programs so we can see the state of the art in
software development and intuitive user interface design. I promise to
give it a fair shake.
 
J

John Boy

Jan 1, 1970
0
Chaos Master said:
John Boy engraved with a +2 athame:


It's not program, but it looks like islandlogics is paying you to do that.


"It's not program" ??? what does that mean, is English your second language?

No need to send a company schematic. Send me a ***example*** of a simulation
from your program.


Why are you still calling it my program? Are you on medication?
 
F

Fred Bloggs

Jan 1, 1970
0
John said:
Hey, I'm still waiting for people like FRED BLOGGS and CHAOS MASTER to
post their wonderful software here so that we can see how it's
"supposed" to be done since they know everything, and so quick to
curse and beat down.

Come on guys, post your programs so we can see the state of the art in
software development and intuitive user interface design. I promise to
give it a fair shake.

Are you in this country on a visa? If so, that situation can be
rectified swiftly.:)
 
J

John Boy

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim Thompson said:
"John Boy" --> ctrl-K, permanent ;-)

Jim I have no beef with you. I'm pissed off because all I did was post
my opinion and I get flamed for it by people who are trying to get
some fame by blasting other people.

It's only fair that they put up their own program so we can all see
the "right" way to do things. Since they believe they have the right
to blast everything, thye must know the right way.

But funny I still hav'nt seen them posting anything!

-Enginer off the boat
 
F

Frank Bemelman

Jan 1, 1970
0
John Boy said:
It's only fair that they put up their own program so we can all see
the "right" way to do things. Since they believe they have the right
to blast everything, thye must know the right way.

I don't have to be an excellent cook to know when something
tastes like sh*t ;)
 
F

Fred Bloggs

Jan 1, 1970
0
Active8 said:
in case anyone want's to stop guessing and start researching (this only
took me about 15 sec which isn't shit compared to the time already spent
bitching,) here's the whois info from sam spade via magic.

note: OP is [email protected] (John Boy)

hard to say where it came from because it appears to have been posted
through google

NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.157.126.202

that an IP addy from a block owned by Bell South

[ where have i heard the name nigel smith before? ]


Registrant:
Island Logix, Inc. (ISLANDLOGIX-DOM)
P.O. Box 157
Waukegan, IL 60079
US

Domain Name: ISLANDLOGIX.COM

Administrative Contact:
Smith, Nigel (NS6526) [email protected]
Island Logix Inc
PO BOX 157
WAUKEGAN, IL 60079-0157
US
(708) 360-0458
Technical Contact:
Esquibel, Bruce (BE8) [email protected]
3163 N. Clybourn Ave.
Chicago, IL 60618
US
773-477-6210 fax: 123 123 1234

Record expires on 01-Mar-2004.
Record created on 15-Oct-2002.
Database last updated on 19-Oct-2003 17:09:25 EDT.

This Esquibel was the focus of a major joint government probe of a
$150M credit card fraud network, and operated a BBS for hackers
exchanging various information pursuant to their furtherance of criminal
activity, such as attempting to shut down a major metropolitan E911
network . His computer equipment was seized on probable cause warrant,
the premises searched, and he was arrested for possession of
unregistered firearms - all in the 1990 timeframe-providing the web
information is credible. But this is just RIPCO and not necessarily
IslandLogix which has since moved its base of operations to Florida.
Listening to JohnBoy, aka Nigel Smith, it is clear they are low life
scum also.
 
A

Active8

Jan 1, 1970
0
in case anyone want's to stop guessing and start researching (this only
took me about 15 sec which isn't shit compared to the time already spent
bitching,) here's the whois info from sam spade via magic.

note: OP is [email protected] (John Boy)

hard to say where it came from because it appears to have been posted
through google

NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.157.126.202

that an IP addy from a block owned by Bell South

[ where have i heard the name nigel smith before? ]


Registrant:
Island Logix, Inc. (ISLANDLOGIX-DOM)
P.O. Box 157
Waukegan, IL 60079
US

Domain Name: ISLANDLOGIX.COM

Administrative Contact:
Smith, Nigel (NS6526) [email protected]
Island Logix Inc
PO BOX 157
WAUKEGAN, IL 60079-0157
US
(708) 360-0458
Technical Contact:
Esquibel, Bruce (BE8) [email protected]
3163 N. Clybourn Ave.
Chicago, IL 60618
US
773-477-6210 fax: 123 123 1234

Record expires on 01-Mar-2004.
Record created on 15-Oct-2002.
Database last updated on 19-Oct-2003 17:09:25 EDT.

This Esquibel was the focus of a major joint government probe of a
$150M credit card fraud network, and operated a BBS for hackers
exchanging various information pursuant to their furtherance of criminal
activity, such as attempting to shut down a major metropolitan E911
network . His computer equipment was seized on probable cause warrant,
the premises searched, and he was arrested for possession of
unregistered firearms - all in the 1990 timeframe-providing the web
information is credible. But this is just RIPCO and not necessarily
IslandLogix which has since moved its base of operations to Florida.
Listening to JohnBoy, aka Nigel Smith, it is clear they are low life
scum also.
[/QUOTE]
yeah. i get almost as many hits on old brucey as i do on the
psuedoscientist i used to work for. i see "Phrack" turns up in one of
them so that just smacks of CRACKING DUDE. HACKERS ARE NOT NECCESSARILY
CRACKERS.

have to yell that 'cause evindently even tech types haven't figured out
the difference. if you gotta say "hacking" in this context, at least say
"criminal hacking.

so you think john boy is nigel smith, eh? i can't remember where nigel
smith popped up. i thought it was from a post, but google didn't return
his name for this group. there's some other guys out there with the same
name.

brs,
mike
 
A

Active8

Jan 1, 1970
0
Is that SPAM?

Of course not, you invited a response by posting in ther first place.
Spam is unsolicited:)
Using every excuse to push your product while bashing
competing products. But I cant blame you, it's just marketing right?
he he he.

Indeed.[/QUOTE]

with one exception. i haven't seen kevin *bash* other products, which
would be *bad* marketing.
useless, in my view.

you ain't shittin'
What system are you using? I admit that it is thirsty resource wise. You
want at least 256M and > 400Mhz uP. I use it with a 1Ghz with 512M, and
I don't notice any problems in GUI speed at all. Note that anything
below XP/NT is crap.

yup. no probs with GUI speed *here*.
Nope. As noted above, I don't have this problem on my system, and I
don't get many complaints on this, if any. When was the last time you
defragged?

frags ain't the prob. if he's low on RAM, the OS will swap out all the
shit it can to make room for the resource to load. frags *can* effect
other performance probs, however, like maybe trying to find a f'in place
to swap to.
As noted above, are you running XP/NT, if not. Do so. Anything else, is
not viable today. Systems below this have a total GUI resource limit of
64k for all processes running.

fact. winders 9x despite all the bs has built in limits.
Wow no way, but a windows GUI, by its nature has similar features. I had
never even heard of VS, when I started SS. I was aware of its crap
precursor though.

LOL. what was the precursor?
Rubbish. EWB technically runs fine on most systems. Its crap in actual
use though.
yup.

Its a bit messy, but not a big issue.


Simetrix has extensively modified core code, so they are not all the
same.

I don't actually charge for my port of the engine itself. You can use
the demo installed engine standalone, with unrestricted features, with
text input and output.

yeah. and you don't even have to pay for that! so write a *real* GUI,
john boy.
Ah... I have now read the next post by Active8, and it does seem that
indeed you are a spamer from Island logic, the vendor of VS.
Interestingly, the first time I tried VS, it failed by using up all GUI
resources because of all those bloody GUI buttoned toolbars.

you can't bullshit Active8 :) too bad you wasted time on this, like me.
JT ctrl-k'd his ass over 24hrs ago. we should be so wise. check what
fred bloggs turned up in his response to me. about the Esquibel guy
who's the tech contact for the island illogic domain. if all that's
true, the moral is that crackers are nothing but puss-ass script kiddies
who couldn't code a proper "hello dickhead" program. hackers, OTOH,
ain't bad.

OTOH, i don't know their background, but l0pht Heavy Industries (IIRC,
now under a different [domain name, at least] name) have come a long
way. I'm considering going to jail to boost my biz ;-) not.

BTW, kevin. i just came back from the local half-arsed pub and realizing
that i didn't hoist an ale for a fellow cock-knocker (read prick, or "no
bullshitter", whatever,) i'm hoisting one for ya now. next time i'll
'ave 'er throw in a guinness ;-) and have a shot for JT.

time for some church music. i think i'll start with Judas Priest.

see ya,
mike
 
A

Active8

Jan 1, 1970
0
On 20 Oct 2003 06:56:34 -0700, John Boy said,
Jim I have no beef with you. I'm pissed off because all I did was post
my opinion and I get flamed for it by people who are trying to get
some fame by blasting other people.

It's only fair that they put up their own program so we can all see
the "right" way to do things. Since they believe they have the right
to blast everything, thye must know the right way.

But funny I still hav'nt seen them posting anything!

-Enginer off the boat
hey cockbreath. you picked a bad time to show up again in my news
client. you're blabbing back to someone who's no doubt bozo bin'd your
ass.

bammelman's reply to you is accurate.

AFAIK you haven't contributed shit to this group and have caused a waste
of bandwidth. i'm guilty for adding to that waste as i type. if you were
a contributor, or a lurker or a poster with a question, it would be a
different matter. but you came along and spammed us with a bs line
AFAIK. i caught your ass AFAIC. go away, get back on the boat. engineer
my ass.
 
A

Active8

Jan 1, 1970
0
At least four of mine just raised their hands.

Only in the Microsoft era did it become OK to have bugs in a program. How
many people hear would get on an airplane controlled by MS windows
programs?

not me. i saw a big CNC router run off the rail under control of a
winders based... i can't call it a program.

-mike
 
Top