Another thing you have no clue about, but it doesn't stop you from
posting your usual ignorant drivel.
The basic laws of physics and the best available science is drivel?
(do tell)
For accommodating each one of us American/westernised village idiots,
and without my even getting this rant into various personal
transportation, communications, lighting or HVAC considerations,
whereas it unavoidably takes a lot of fossil crude oil, coal, natural
gas and/or even yellowcake derived energy in order to commercially
produce, transport, process, extra fancy package, further transport
and eventually distribute the vast bulk of our food, the majority of
which (50+% upon average) gets tossed out and/or disposed of for more
than one good or bad reason or another. It's often worse off on the
sorts of commercial/consumer inert goods that too often get hardly
utilized at all before they get discarded or stored at something
that's costing us more energy than they're worth, along with many of
such inert items being energy consumers to boot. Recycling is for the
most part a pathetic joke, as having been costing us more energy and
subsequently polluting in more ways than most of us can count, with
only a few exceptions to that rule which simply does not make up for
the overall negative energy and subsequent pollution aspects of our
all-inclusive recycling package.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrel_of_oil_equivalent
1 barrel = 5.8e6 BTU @59°F equals 6.118e9 J, or about 1.7 MW.h
Figure at best roughly 50% efficiency, as that's worth 850 kw.h
If it were all going into your Hummer, figure 12.5% or 213 kw.h
Some of the folks I've worked for and of many others I know of
couldn't hardly survive on less than an equivalent barrel worth of
crude oil energy per hour. Go figure how their life style needs 168
fold as much energy as myself. In other words, we can use all the
spare hydro-electric, solar, wind, tidal and geothermal energy we can
get, plus He3 fusion if possible.
Willie.Moo/(aka William Mook)
Well I'm working on some synfuel plants right now. Once that is
underway I will do some acquisitions in the US. I am not seeking
outside investors or participation.
Synfuels such as h2o2 have been a done deal for better than a century
(H2O2 was discovered in 1818), that is unless there's no ongoing
incentive or honest considerations for the new and improved ICE of
dual fuel injected and of a one-cycle format that'll safely utilize
such an energy rich fluid as h2o2, along with a little conventional
fossil fuel or whatever other synfuel that'll create the absolute
minimum CO2 and zilch or zero NOx.
All other conventional ICEs that'll burn whatever fuel along with our
mostly N2 atmosphere are going to get relatively poor empg, as well as
keep polluting at maximum levels of CO2 and NOx, plus unavoidably
contributing many other nasty byproducts in their birth-to-grave (aka
all inclusive) energy cycle. Even utilizing H2+atmosphere is not
going to entirely save our badly failing environment that's going to
be continually getting hotter because of what the basic laws of
physics has to do with any planet having recently obtained such a
horrific mascon of a nearby moon, that's orbiting its mostly fluid
planet just fast enough as to keeping our inner planetology vary much
alive and geothermally kicking.
It seems the usenet anti-think-tank gauntlet of naysayism has been
well enough polished to see your self, and this faith-based cultism
that's in charge of keeping those mostly fossil fuels and yellowcake
as spendy as possible, is thereby in charge of keeping our environment
as polluted and every bit as lethal as possible, especially as we
merge ourselves into WWIII on behalf of surviving their mostly semitic
global energy domination quest.
Of one fairly recent contribution on behalf of the makings and
utilizing of h2o2: "Hydrogen Peroxide and Sugar"
http://www.americanenergyindependence.com/peroxide.html
Besides direct energy applied usage, there's lots of other nifty h2o2
applications that shouldn't go unnoticed, or under appreciated:
http://www.h2o2.com/intro/faq.html
In spite of what's being orchestrated and said about myself, I'm not
the actual messenger from hell that's suggesting plain old H2 or LH2
should ever be excluded, as obviously H2, LH2 and LOx are each good to
go as is, and as such should also be produced via clean energy along
with the energy storage likes of aluminum and magnesium as derived
from whatever's the cache of clean and renewable energy that's in
surplus. However, for the average end-user of liquid fuels for our
Hummers, SUVs and massive trucks that are typically 10X more macho/
overkill than necessary, is exactly where the usage of h2o2+fossil or
h2o2+synfuel becomes one of our most viable alternatives, especially
once all those birth-to-grave energy cards are turned face up.
The H2 fuel cell form of energy for personal and light commercial
transportation seems doable, although fairly complex, spendy as all
get out and still somewhat birth-to-grave polluting once those pesky
all-inclusive factors are taken fully into account. This doesn't in
any way interpret as meaning that we should not have such H2 fuel cell
powered cars, light SUV/trucks and even pocket utility grid modules of
such clean energy derived via H2 and atmosphere, because we most
certainly should. William Mook's planned use of H2 for extracting
fossil oil is obviously another direct application that's nothing but
a solid win-win for everyone's gipper, including mother nature's
gipper.
Of what we badly need is the likes of Mook's greatly improved
terrestrial base of solar derived energy (though also including the
likes of Buffett's wind, tidal and geothermal alternatives shouldn't
be excluded or much less banished) that'll fit rather nicely into our
future needs without their imposing too much land or ocean usage
that's otherwise needed as is. Mook's SBLs are clearly doable,
especially if those were given a moon tethered platform that'll reach
those SBLs safely to with 2r of mother Earth, as to safely operate
from. The problem seems that folks much like yourself do not actually
understand all that much of anything about our moon's L1, or much less
of what such tethered configurations have to offer. Wouldn't you
folks like to see this one in a fully interactive 3D simulation, such
as produced by yet another one of those spendy Google/NOVA animation
infomercial productions? (I most certainly would)
- Brad Guth -
