[Eeyore]

There's that crazy Zion jewboy again

Just why EXACTLY do you have such a downer on Jews ?

Graham

 

[BradGuth]

Just why EXACTLY do you have such a downer on Jews ?

Graham

As I've said more than a thousand times, that most Jews are good folks
that simply can't manage to police their own bad kind, like all of
those nasty Zion Yids that reside here within your usenet naysay land
that simply can't take a hint that their faith-based fuckology is no
longer needed.

Perhaps you folks should try constructively thinking inside that box
of yours before trying any of the much tougher outside of the box
thinking.

Fossil and even yellowcake energy is simply not affordably forever,
and even if it were we'd become too freaking polluted and/or too
downright bloody or recovering from too much collateral damage for our
own damn good.

Why not help R&D and/or simply promote the likes of William Mook (aka
Willie.Moo) or anyone else having a viable clean/renewable energy
alternative notion for accommodating our future liquid fuel needs?

What's wrong with weird or even spendy fuel-cell, hybrid or dual-fuel
ICE energy, as long as it doesn't pollute or get folks dead? (or is
WWIII your one and only option?)
- Brad Guth -

 

[krw]

Now you're being a silly jewboy or at least one of their brown-nosed
minions, arnt you.

You must be the captain of your high school debate team.

 

[BradGuth]

Just why EXACTLY do you have such a downer on Jews ?

Graham

You mean bad Jews. There's a difference between being a bad Jew and
being a good Jew, though obviously you and others of your kind haven't
noticed. I'm actually down on most any faith-based bad guy or bad
girl that's knowingly taking advantage of others, as seems to be the
bad guy kind of trend that's running the rest of us amock/amuck. How
about yourself?
- Brad Guth -

 

[Eeyore]

You mean bad Jews. There's a difference between being a bad Jew and
being a good Jew, though obviously you and others of your kind haven't
noticed.

No different from people in general.

I'm actually down on most any faith-based bad guy or bad
girl that's knowingly taking advantage of others, as seems to be the
bad guy kind of trend that's running the rest of us amock/amuck. How
about yourself?

Religion is fraud IMHO. I see much of its influence as being retrogressive.

Graham

 

[Jeff Liebermann]

Religion is fraud IMHO. I see much of its influence as being retrogressive.
Graham

We're working on bringing the Jewish religion up to date and
acceptable in a technology intensive society. For example:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.sco.misc/msg/ccef57b1a28ed0fd>

 

[Eeyore]

We're working on bringing the Jewish religion up to date and
acceptable in a technology intensive society. For example:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.sco.misc/msg/ccef57b1a28ed0fd>

Thanks for the link ! :~)

Graham

 

[BradGuth]

No different from people in general.

People in general do not put their own kind on a stick for a faith-
based PR stunt, and then proceed to remain in total denial, as well as
having been blaiming others for everything bad that happens, while
taking credit for each and every good thing that comes along. It's
also called being a faith-based and/or bigoted liar.

Religion is fraud IMHO. I see much of its influence as being retrogressive.

Having a healthy amount of faith in whatever's greater than yourself
is a good thing for most of us. Being a pretend atheists is typically
a bad sort of thing, any way you'd care to cut it. Honest religion is
also good for the soul, as well as being good for humanity and that of
our environment. Bad or skewed/conditional religion isn't much good
for anything.
- Brad Guth -

 

[BradGuth]

We're working on bringing the Jewish religion up to date and
acceptable in a technology intensive society. For example:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.sco.misc/msg/ccef57b1a28ed0fd>

That's a darn good one for the old faith-based gipper.

How about including some kind of internal/robo auto-policing of their
own kind?
- Brad Guth -

 

[Eeyore]

People in general do not put their own kind on a stick for a faith-
based PR stunt, and then proceed to remain in total denial, as well as
having been blaiming others for everything bad that happens, while
taking credit for each and every good thing that comes along. It's
also called being a faith-based and/or bigoted liar.

And where have Jews done this to any greater degree than happens in life
generally ? State what you mean in detail.

Graham

 

[Jeff Liebermann]

That's a darn good one for the old faith-based gipper.

Thanks. I wrote that one about 10 years ago. I made some mistakes
but lost the corrections.

How about including some kind of internal/robo auto-policing of their
own kind?
- Brad Guth -

Huh? We already have rabbinical courts to deal with internal
differences:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beth_din>
Incidentally, there isn't just one flavor of Judaism:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_ethnic_divisions>
so there are plenty of internal differences to argue over.

 

[Rich the Philosophizer]

Religion is fraud IMHO. I see much of its influence as being retrogressive.

"...But lately my confusion about this has been lifting. I'm beginning
to realize what's been making it seem to the Mother and me like God is
two-faced.

"The confusion has been understandable... because there actually have
been TWO Gods. And they have long been at odds with each other.

"Deeper than the level of form and duality, of course... has always been
a single Spirit who is Love. But the One Spirit, the Spirit of Love long
ago denied himself. This caused a 'shadow' to emerge, a part of himself
of whom he became unconscious.

"The shadow of Love is Power. Love first gave much of his Power to
Lucifer. And then over time he denied the rest of his Power, handing it
to Ahriman.

"Love, real Love feels much better than Power... yet most humans have
chosen to worship the god of Power, not the God of Love. Praised from the
pulpits and beseeched in the deepest prayers for relief from pain and
oppression, the god of Power has been very popular.

"Power has constantly affirmed that he and only he is God. And he has
been very successful at this... many beings have never even known that
the God of Love exists.

"And for a while there... he almost didn't."
-- http://godchannel.com/lovepower.html

Cheers!
Rich

 

[BradGuth]

I was invited to consult with a middle eastern power, to teach them
picosecond electronics for their nuclear weapons program, for big
bucks. And I had the opportunity to sell to a major cigarette
manufacturer. Turned them both down.

And I sold several thousand end-use load survey meters used to analyze
power consumption and temperature data in homes and commercial
buildings. We're engineers here; we do things.

John

Then do such nifty things with the makings and using of h2o2+synfuel
or h2o2+whatever fossil fuel, as for easily accomplishing that clean
100 empg Hummer at zero NOx, because such a hybrid Hummer or full
sized hybrid SUV/truck is technically as doable as is the making of
h2o2 or even LOx and LH2 from any number of clean and renewable energy
sources (just ask William Mook, Warren Buffett or myself). Of course
unlike yourself, I'm not nearly as all knowing, and I even make my
fair share of mistakes, which means that I could always use some of
your faultless expertise.
- Brad Guth -

 

[BradGuth]

In sci.physics, John Larkin
<[email protected]>
wrote

It's remarkable how little you do understand.

It's easy to imagine things when you are unencumbered by numbers.

And what's this "Yid" obsession about? That makes as little sense as
the rest of your ravings.

Is it not obvious? Yids [*], of course, are preventing us
from building and then harvesting hydrogen peroxide from
these towers. It's all their fault.

Don't be silly, as it's only the bad Yids here in their very own anti-
think-tank of pretend atheists naysayism that's at fault, as most
other Jews are simply good folks.

It might be the yarmulkes, but it could be the dreidels.
Something about square spinning tops and wearing certain
headgear might hypnotize prospective investors into making
a beeline to the nearest oil well or coal mine instead of
doing the proper thing and building these towers.

Funny, but perhaps true enough, as oddly these silly folks here in
usenet naysayland don't seem to give a tinkers squat or even hardly
worth their breaking wind about our badly failing environment, or much
less as to the bloody spendy aspects of energy, especially of most any
liquid forms of such energy that has to consume our polluted and
mostly N2 atmosphere.

Personally, I think hypnodisks and simple
chemistry/economics would be more effective, but what do
I know? I'm Yiddish, of course --BradGuthhas said so.

Acting like a bad Yid is all it takes, just like acting like a Muslim
having a bad postal kind of 9/11 day is all that it took, although
like many such horrifically bad situations that shouldn't have ever
happened, the whole truth and nothing but the truths about 9/11 are
far from known by the general nonyiddish public, and as we all know
darn good and well that Yids do not police their own kind, but they
have been known to allow putting one of their own kind on a stick for
an impressive faith-based PR stunt. (go figure)

Mind you, I don't even have a yarmulke (though I do
have a baseball cap or two), and the closest thing I
have to a dreidel is a six-sided die, which I've lost
somewhere in this place of mine, along with the rest of
my Platonic-figured (aka Dungeons & Dragons) dice. Of
course, that shouldn't matter to a true bigot anyway...

So, those of your pretend atheist kind would just as soon let all the
bad guys lose, all because there's no such thing as a bad soul on
Earth, especially of any faith-based Yiddish or other holy grail kind
as having any grasp of our private parts simply can't be one of the
bad guys. No wonder we're headed for WWIII, and just as fast as your
anti-bigotry worth of having been snookered and dumbfounded past the
point of no return can possibly take us. And here we'd once thought
Hitler was a bad sort.

As for "spare energy"....I agree with Eeyore; we'll use
the surplus for various things, if there ever is one.
I'm not all that hopeful at this point, and in any event
supply and demand will balance things out -- electricity
will never be "too cheap to meter", as once claimed for
fission power.

Wait until I'm in charge, along with the energy wizard likes of
William Mook, Warren Buffett and others as smart or smarter than your
entire borg collective of all those silly Zion Yids you so
unconditionally love so much.
- Brad Guth -

 

[BradGuth]

BradGuthwrote:


Hey Braddie,
We LIKE what Bill has to say. He is an engineer, and often asks
pertinent, engineering questions on this forum (SED) that provoke
interesting discussions. He has also done MATH on his proposals, and
admits that some of them are a little over the top, but we respect his
ideas even as we critique them!

It is a whole different idea between "I don't think it will work." and
"What color is the sky on your planet?" ;-)

Charlie

But you folks never seem to support or otherwise promote, much less
constructively contribute as to anything Mook. Instead you
continually rant against and otherwise support the ongoing AGW
process, as well as otherwise favor the polluting and spendy status
quo of burning off fossil fuels in order to produce as much CO2 and
NOx regardless of the consequences, and you have no objections
whatsoever as to seeing a future of $1000/kg yellowcake that'll only
further insure that we'll have to pay $1/kwhr plus having another $1/
gallon of federal excise tax applied to whatever liquid fuel in order
to continually finance our global energy domination wars as based
almost entirely upon the sorts of lies which you folks continually
approve of. Why is that?
- Brad Guth -

 

[BradGuth]

BradGuthwrote:


You understand jack shit.


I think Willie Mook's ideas are very interesting. I hope it works out well for him.
Even if his solar cells turn out to be as efficient as he hopes it will takes decades
to manufacture enough to make even the tiniest dent in our energy needs. He would
certainly have to licence the process.

However, using them to make hydrogen would be a criminal waste of energy.

Graham

You have such a limited or perhaps swarm like skewed sense of faith,
especially in the likes of Mook.

I tend to agree, that even a Mook PV alternative is at best worth
second place to whatever a good set of those hybrid wind and PV/
stirling towers of 40+kw/m2 footprints can safely accomplish.
However, we'll need that yaysay mindset that's focused upon the task
at hand, instead of your typical all-knowing naysayism that's so all
or nothing mainstream status quo or bust, as though you folks work for
the likes of ExxonMobil. I also agree that exclusively creating plain
old H2 or even LH2 is somewhat of a wasted use for that clean/
renewable energy, whereas h2o2 and on behalf of many other synfuels or
even on behalf of producing those nifty energy solids, such as
aluminum, simply isn't.
- Brad Guth -

 

[BradGuth]

[email protected] posted to sci.electronics.design:







If you do not like the reception you get here do not post here.
Nobody here is forcing you to post here.

So, you folks and fellow Yids of naysayism don't much care for the
whole truth and nothing but the truth about much of anything. No
wonder you had to put your own kind on a stick for that faith-based PR
stunt.
- Brad Guth -

 

[Charlie Edmondson]

But you folks never seem to support or otherwise promote, much less
constructively contribute as to anything Mook. Instead you
continually rant against and otherwise support the ongoing AGW
process, as well as otherwise favor the polluting and spendy status
quo of burning off fossil fuels in order to produce as much CO2 and
NOx regardless of the consequences, and you have no objections
whatsoever as to seeing a future of $1000/kg yellowcake that'll only
further insure that we'll have to pay $1/kwhr plus having another $1/
gallon of federal excise tax applied to whatever liquid fuel in order
to continually finance our global energy domination wars as based
almost entirely upon the sorts of lies which you folks continually
approve of. Why is that?
- Brad Guth -

Blue! If anyone from Earth asks you, its supposed to be Blue!

And, you ain't listening. We have given Bill a lot of support and asked
pertinent questions, to which he has given pertinent answers. He
contributes regularly to threads that have nothing whatsoever to do with
solar power or hydrogen, and everything to do with practical
electronics. You, on the other hand, don't.

Charlie

 

[BradGuth]

BradGuthwrote:


You understand jack shit.


I think Willie Mook's ideas are very interesting. I hope it works out well for him.
Even if his solar cells turn out to be as efficient as he hopes it will takes decades
to manufacture enough to make even the tiniest dent in our energy needs. He would
certainly have to licence the process.

However, using them to make hydrogen would be a criminal waste of energy.

Eeyore/Graham, you have such a limited or perhaps swarm like skewed or
out of context sense of faith, especially in the likes of Mook. By
default Mook is nearly always WorldFactBook interesting but not nearly
as all-knowing or as being entirely honest about certain things. His
energy focus that's so entirely PV based has merit, but also has
certain spendy birth-to-grave issues or limitations unless those
necessary millions of acres were donated and given unrestricted use on
his behalf.

I tend to agree, that even a Mook terrestrial PV or SBL boosted
alternative is at best worth second place to whatever a good set of
those hybrid wind and PV/stirling towers of 40+kw/m2 footprints can
safely accomplish as is. However, for any good outcome we'll need to
employ our best yaysay mindset that's focused upon the task at hand,
of safely extracting as much clean/renewable energy as possible from
the physics of mother nature's active and interactive planetology, as
well as directly from our sun and even that of our moon's gravity/
tidal energy should not continually go to waste. Instead of
supporting your typical all-knowing naysayism that's so all or nothing
mainstream status quo or bust, being as though you folks secretly work
for the likes of ExxonMobil or ENRON, as such is not representing a
win-win for the environment or humanity unless you're already set for
life because of being rich and powerful enough that the inflationary
cost of living and of whatever stay-the-course consequences are of no
great concern.

I'd also agree with your analogy, that exclusively creating plain old
H2 or even LH2 is somewhat of a wasted use for that clean/renewable
cache of surplus energy, whereas the makings of h2o2 and on behalf of
many other synfuels or even shared on behalf of producing those nifty
energy solids, such as aluminum, simply isn't a bad outcome for us to
look forward to, that is if we actually ever had the spare/surplus
cache of such clean/renewable energy to start with.
- Brad Guth -

 

[BradGuth]

You'e out of your mind (I know, stating the obvious). "Mookie"
hasn't shared anything, other than hand waving. Patent numbers would
be a start.

But lord Mookie thinks that you're all working so extra hard on his
behalf. Go figure.

Speaking about "hand waving", what's your best solution(s)to a badly
AGW and polluted world w/o affordable fossil or yellowcake fuel? Can
you and others of your kind afford $1/mile, or $1/kwhr?

Offshore protected corporations most certainly like those "patent
numbers", but why on Earth do you insist upon having such? Are you
folks planning a new and improved ENRON thing?

Do you even know how many decades behind our US patent process is
running?

Do you know how much the global enforcement of a nifty patent will
cost us?

How many decades are you willing to make us wait, and how many extra
millions if not billions are you and your patents willing to make us
spend?
- Brad Guth -