An aim is to observe visually such a transparent specimen using
uniform diffused light. This must be a daylight with high CRI. There
are some fluorescent like TLD950 but they are very long (50 cm) and
hard to get in depots.
You're right about the naked tube to be better but now one as I know
produce coated naked halogens as a daylight simulators. And of course
the costs - WhiteStars are the cheapest on the market.
Baffle distance need to be calculated - I think that Radiance could be
used for such simulation. I don't have any books about spheres (some
labsphere docs) but mine wouldn't be used for measurements.
Coating of the baffles - lamp side an electro polished stainless
steel? Reverse side and sphere itself would be a DIN painting (stable
undercoat and washable topcoat) or a usual painting from depot but
they are stronger in blue region - not as flat as they should. Look
for the WhiteStar spectra - it's far from d50 which is more flat.
Vic - maybe you know the better idea of using halogens as a uniform
illuminator?
Thanks in advance - Jack,
I would suggest a flat white paint on all interior surfaces,
including the baffles. If the baffles are specular then the light
distribution will not be as uniform.
I don't have a good recommendation for a daylight light source. The
Philips TL-D 90 Graphia Pro has a CCT of 5300 and a CRI of 98 and the
18 watt version is only about 600 mm long, but the spectrum is still
significantly different than sunlight. You should get a better
spectrum from a short arc xenon lamp and the lamp would also be the
size you want, but I don't have enough time today to do any more
research. I will look again tomorrow. Perhaps others in this group may
have better ideas.
--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.
This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.