Black holes do reduce light in LEDs?

A

Anakin Skywater

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi, I have learned about holes and electrons in semiconductors.
Then I did read about black holes, and that Einstein predicted those.
Now it says that light cannot leave black holes.
can it be LEDs age because more and more holes turn black?

Please reply fast,
Yours Truly
Anakin Skywater.
 
M

Martin Griffith

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi, I have learned about holes and electrons in semiconductors.
Then I did read about black holes, and that Einstein predicted those.
Now it says that light cannot leave black holes.
can it be LEDs age because more and more holes turn black?

Please reply fast,
Yours Truly
Anakin Skywater.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole


martin
 
S

Sam Wormley

Jan 1, 1970
0
Anakin said:
Hi, I have learned about holes and electrons in semiconductors.
Then I did read about black holes, and that Einstein predicted those.
Now it says that light cannot leave black holes.
can it be LEDs age because more and more holes turn black?

Please reply fast,
Yours Truly
Anakin Skywater.

Think about what a black hole is... when mass is concentrated
within it's Schwarzschild radius. All that left is a region of
infinitely warped space and warped time (warped spacetime).


Black Holes Explained
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blackhole/expl-text.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blackhole/expl-thorne.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blackhole/explained.html

Hawking Radiation
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/hawking.html

Black Holes
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/BlackHole.html
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/topics/BlackHoles.html
http://www.gothosenterprises.com/black_holes/static_black_holes.html
http://www.gothosenterprises.com/black_holes/rotating_black_holes.html
http://edu-observatory.org/eo/black_holes.html
 
M

malibu

Jan 1, 1970
0


Black Holes are a *Hypothesis*.

They are not proven.

If one assumes that gravity experienced by matter
and light is also produced by that same matter
and light as some kind of outwardly-moving,
inwardly-acting wave/particle/whatever, then one
arrives at the Black Hole when enough matter is concentrated
in one spot to *crush itself*.

It's a totally stupid idea- just like a snake eating its own tail
and disappearing- which stems from ignorance about how gravity works.

Dark Matter also stems from this same ignorance.

Present scientific 'doctrine' on gravity is laughable.

John
 
U

Uncle Al

Jan 1, 1970
0
Anakin said:
Hi, I have learned about holes and electrons in semiconductors.
Then I did read about black holes, and that Einstein predicted those.
Now it says that light cannot leave black holes.
can it be LEDs age because more and more holes turn black?

Please reply fast,
Yours Truly
Anakin Skywater.

Study harder. Dare to be stupid.
 
M

malibu

Jan 1, 1970
0
Study harder. Dare to be stupid.

--

Study what?
That black holes exist?
That's stupid!

Science by peer pressure.

Hey, Al, how 'bout that gravitomagnetic thing
a la Puddlenykov?
I thought you had a firm opinion
on that. What was it again? "Not even wrong",
or something like that?

John
 
S

Sam Wormley

Jan 1, 1970
0
malibu said:
Black Holes are a *Hypothesis*.

They are not proven.

Proofs for of the domain of mathematics... black holes are found
all over the cosmos and appear to be major players in the evolution
of galaxies...

Try a bit of self education before spewing, John.
 
S

Sam Wormley

Jan 1, 1970
0
malibu said:
Study what?
That black holes exist?
That's stupid!

Black holes are found all over the cosmos and appear to be
major players in the evolution of galaxies...
 
R

Richard Henry

Jan 1, 1970
0
Black Holes are a *Hypothesis*.

They are not proven.

If one assumes that gravity experienced by matter
and light is also produced by that same matter
and light as some kind of outwardly-moving,
inwardly-acting wave/particle/whatever, then one
arrives at the Black Hole when enough matter is concentrated
in one spot to *crush itself*.

It's a totally stupid idea- just like a snake eating its own tail
and disappearing- which stems from ignorance about how gravity works.

Dark Matter also stems from this same ignorance.

Present scientific 'doctrine' on gravity is laughable.

One must assume, then, that you have a better doctrine on gravity. Please
enlighten us.
 
H

Howard Eisenhauer

Jan 1, 1970
0
*Snip*



Black Holes are a *Hypothesis*.

They are not proven.


*Snip*

John

Of course they exist!

I've got dozens of the damn things around here, every time I drop a
small part it hits the floor & bounces straight into one. :(

H.
 
M

Martin Griffith

Jan 1, 1970
0
small part it hits the floor & bounces straight into one. :(

H.
Yabutt, shouldn't they be popping out the otherside of the black hole,
so you should have the same number left, assuming the other guy in the
other worlde did the same.

Test for polarity, could be the wrong sort of silicon.


martin
 
P

PeterD

Jan 1, 1970
0
Yabutt, shouldn't they be popping out the otherside of the black hole,
so you should have the same number left, assuming the other guy in the
other worlde did the same.

Yes, but I can't use his parts. He only drops things that I don't
need.
 
M

mpm

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi, I have learned about holes and electrons in semiconductors.
Then I did read about black holes, and that Einstein predicted those.
Now it says that light cannot leave black holes.
can it be LEDs age because more and more holes turn black?

Please reply fast,
Yours Truly
Anakin Skywater.

..Speaking of "black holes".......
 
R

Robert Baer

Jan 1, 1970
0
Anakin said:
Hi, I have learned about holes and electrons in semiconductors.
Then I did read about black holes, and that Einstein predicted those.
Now it says that light cannot leave black holes.
can it be LEDs age because more and more holes turn black?

Please reply fast,
Yours Truly
Anakin Skywater.
No, they turn green with envy because they are not related in any manner.
 
M

malibu

Jan 1, 1970
0
One must assume, then, that you have a better doctrine on gravity. Please
enlighten us.


First, let's look at the present doctrine.

Matter causes spacetime curvature.
Spacetime curvature influences matter (gravity).

Essentially, matter creates gravity and then is controlled by it.

You have a cause (matter), an effect (gravity), which then
acts on the matter.

The matter is controlling itself.

Thus, you arrive at the paradox- the Black Hole.
It's a closed loop.

Stupid.

John
 
B

Benj

Jan 1, 1970
0
Oh no! ARe you telling me that Black holes are "just a theory" sort of
like Evolution? Next thing you know someone will be trying to make
schools teach "black hole intelleigent design"! "Just a theory",
gimme a break! If the establishment says it's true then questioning
it is heresy! Maybe a little taste of the stake will hone your
theories!
Of course they exist!

I've got dozens of the damn things around here, every time I drop a
small part it hits the floor & bounces straight into one. :(

Absolutely! I've witnessed this many time. I've studied this and what
happens is that when a small screw or other part heads toward the
floor the floor will open up a rift and the part will shoot into
time. It's a quantum effect and the probability of a rift opening
depends upon the size of the object. For objects like small camera
screws the probability is virtually 100%! Large objects like
buildings have almost zero probability. The object upon entering the
time rift goes into an orbit that will eventually take it back to the
point of entry. The larger the object the smaller the orbit and the
sooner it comes back. I recall working on my camera once in the back
room. A tiny screw headed for the floor and the floor opened up and it
shot into time. I scoured every inch of that floor looking for the
screw. It was definitely GONE! Yet, one month later I was sitting in
that chair looked at the floor and right where that screw had hit the
floor previously it was laying big as life. NO QUESTION that screw was
not there before! All this phenomena is so commonplace and obvious I
don't understand why physicists have not taken more interest in these
anomalies? This is one quantum effect that is easily demonstrated.
Forget bowling balls bounding back from table edges, the truly
measurable quantum effects are repeatable ones like screws tunneling
into time.
 
B

Benj

Jan 1, 1970
0
First, let's look at the present doctrine.

Matter causes spacetime curvature.
Spacetime curvature influences matter (gravity).

Essentially, matter creates gravity and then is controlled by it.

You have a cause (matter), an effect (gravity), which then
acts on the matter.

The matter is controlling itself.

Thus, you arrive at the paradox- the Black Hole.
It's a closed loop.

Stupid.

No Wait! Not Stupid! This a great theory! It clearly explains why
small parts go into ORBIT when they shoot into time!!!!
 
Top