BradGuthwrote:
No. Frankly, I thought YOU were. Some of the things you have said in
this forum... Well, let's just say they don't fall within the scope of
polite debate.
But if you don't intend to make the H2O2 while you drive, why would you
find it necessary to have a chemical plant in your car? Let the gas
stations sell it instead. Makes for a lighter car.
I agree, as to why I never excluded service station obtained h2o2.
Having the option of an internal converter that takes plain old
filtered water along with that Hummer plugged in at home or at the
office would simply make that water into h2o2. Get the other fossil
or biofuel from wherever and you're good to go, even if you also need
that same service station to provide the necessary h2o2 is still good
to go. Either way you'll have that 100 mpg Hummer and zero NOx
contributed to the environment.
There are other than zero NOx advantages to what this dual injected
little engine accommodates.
Please, tell me again what problems you aim to solve with your proposed
use of H2O2. I believe one valid point of it is to reduce the amount of
nitrous compounds in the exhaust. What else do you have?
I do believe we're solving a good number of problems by simply
allowing the best available technology to prevail.
It'll offer lots of compact energy as derived from a fairly small
radial turbine or rotary like engine (I'd think partly ceramic).
There's obviously no atmospheric intake issues.
There's no wasted compression or exhaust stroke.
There's an absolute minimum of CO2 toxic fumes and zero worth of NOx
when having to operate within a tunnel or in most other tight quarters
(obviously zero toxic when on battery).
It's extremely smooth running, especially as a hybrid configuration.
It'll run nearly as well under water or under mud as it would function
even better in a vacuum (DoD should love this kick ass Hummer).
The full minute+ and up to possibly six minutes worth of hybrid burst
or peak wheel energy of delivering a combined 1000 shp is perfectly
doable, along with otherwise as much as a sustained 250 shp for those
extended hauling applications.
Nearly any kind of fossil or biofuel alternatives will suit the needs
of getting the most energy bang per kg of whatever fuel and h2o2.
It is relatively end-user safe and sane because, us dumbfounded
village idiot humans will never see or much less touch the h2o2.
h2o2 could also directly provide for the 12.5 kwhr of hybrid battery
energy (optional 25 kwhr).
The makings of h2o2 can be every bit as green and/or as renewable as
you'd care to make them.
There'd soon be 85% less fossil or biofuels consumed, allowing much
less as having to be extracted from deep with Earth or via biofuel
alternatives, and perhaps zero of such imported (including from Canada
or Mexico). The all inclusive fossil related environmental impact
would drop off to a dull roar. Spendy Coal gassification fuels would
burn very nicely. Most of the more iffy coal mines could be shut down
until fully robotic operations are established, thus much fewer
industry related injuries and deaths to deal with and having to pay
dearly for.
There are a few other advantages that'll I'll have to recall from
previous research and subsequent deductive notions, that by rights
should pan out, in favor of what h2o2 plus a little fossil or biofuel
can provide.
- Brad Guth
