The All Electric AL-h2o2 or Hybrid Electric Hummer @100 empg and Zero
NOx, is not nearly as naysay as these Usenet spooks, moles and
infomercial spewing rusemasters would have you believe. Yid's (aka
pretend atheists) are not exactly big on positive/constructive
thinking, that is unless it involves the demise and/or extermination
of others, as perhaps why they'd thought putting one of their own kind
on a stick was a good sort of PR notion at the time.
The not so little h2o2 + fossil/biofuel Hummer alternative, that
seriously could save our AGW sorry butts, and then some. It's doable
as of more than a decade ago, that is if it wasn't for the bloody
gauntlet of naysayism that's intent upon blocking each and every path.
Our failing environment badly needs that do or die kick in our fossil
sucking butt, whereas the all electric car has been technically
doable, especially with the enviro-safe and otherwise clean h2o2/
aluminum (AL-h2o2) battery or semi-fuel-cell, along with allowing as
much global renewable energy put in charge of producing the raw h2o2
and aluminum.
However, as you folks should realize there's no such thing as 100%
safe energy, or even of those products made with said energy. I'm
certain there will become those unfortunate deaths associated with
getting fusion energy up and running, especially if any of that
required bulk or volume of He3 is derived from our moon, as well as
there being a few more of those wind and solar farm along with other
renewable energy related deaths, though all combined a far cry from
the ongoing fossil and all-inclusive yellowcake related deaths, and at
hardly 1% the environmental impact.
Sevenhundred Elves:
Please, tell me again what problems you aim to solve with your proposed
use of H2O2. I believe one valid point of it is to reduce the amount of
nitrous compounds in the exhaust. What else do you have?
By way of safely creating and utilizing h2o2, I do believe we're on
the right set of technological tracks for resolving a good number of
enviro-friendly energy and AGW problems, by simply allowing the best
available technology of liquid fuels and energy cells to prevail.
Just to start off with, it'll offer lots of compact energy as derived
from a fairly small radial turbine or rotary like engine (I'd think
partly if not mostly ceramic).
Efficient at a forth the ICE strokes, as there's obviously no
atmospheric intake issues, and therefore there's none of those wasted
intake, compression or exhaust strokes.
There's an absolute minimum of those sooty and toxic/acidic CO2
exhaust fumes generated and obviously zero worth of NOx, especially
nifty whenever having to operate within a tunnel or in most other
tight quarters (obviously zero toxic when on battery).
There shouldn't be any sulphur unless intentionally kept within the
small amount of consumed fossil fuel or added to whatever biofuel.
It's extremely smooth and quiet operating, especially stealth as a
fully hybrid AWD configuration.
It will run nearly as well under water or under mud (though at geratly
reduced empg) as it would function even better than 100 empg in a
given vacuum, such as upon our moon or Mars (DoD and even NASA should
seriously love this kick ass Hummer).
The full minute+ and likely up to six minutes worth of hybrid burst or
peak wheel energy of delivering a combined 1000 shp is perfectly
doable within existing wheel-motor spec, along with otherwise as much
as a sustained 250 shp for those extended hauling applications, and
otherwise the combined 125 SHP worth of a continuous AWD rating would
actually require a very small radial/rotary ICE.
Nearly any kind of fossil or biofuel alternatives will suit the needs
of getting the most clean energy bang per kg of whatever fuel and
h2o2.
It is relatively end-user safe and sane because, us dumbfounded
village idiot humans will never see or much less touch the h2o2.
h2o2 should also directly provide for the 10 kg 12.5 kwhr worth of
hybrid battery energy (optional 20 kg 25 kwhr). Of course for added
end-user and aggressive gridlock jamming safety is why those AL-h2o2
batteries will need robust packaging, therefore you can double if not
triple the given mass to being worth at least 20 kg for the 12.5 kwhr
and 40 kg for the 25 kwhr cell, but even at 30 kg/12.5 kwhr or
respectively 60 kg/25 kwhr is still a good deal of safe battery energy
storage per kg, as well as per cm3. BTW, the Al-h2o2 battery or
energy/fuel cell itself is not per say recharged off the grid, but
simply instead given a small supply of aluminum plus sharing some of
the raw h2o2 that's going to be consumed along with whatever fossil or
biofuel.
The makings of h2o2 can be every bit as green and/or as renewable as
you'd care to make them. There can even be an internal h2o-->h2o2
conversion process incorporated within the Hummer (aka: add water and
plug it in).
There'd soon be 85% less fossil and/or biofuels consumed for such
formats of h2o2 composite hybrids, allowing for much less of fossil
fuel having to be extracted from deep within Earth, or as liquid fuel
processed out of coal, extracted from oily sand and/or created via
spendy biofuel alternatives, and perhaps eventually zero of such
imported (including from Canada or Mexico). The all inclusive fossil
related environmental impact would soon thereafter drop off to a dull
roar, without having to infringe upon those pesky old atmospheric
burning and environmentally polluting engines. Meanwhile, spendy Coal
gassification fuels would burn very nicely along with h2o2, and most
of our more iffy/lethal coal mines could be shut down until fully
robotic operations are established, thus much fewer industry related
injuries and deaths to deal with and having to pay dearly for.
In addition to what I've just contributed on behalf of using h2o2,
there's also a little something positive and thus constructive to
being said about the renewable energy surplus going into any number of
biofuel or even on behalf of coal gassification productions. For
example; the absolute lowest grade of coal or oil shale burns
extremely well when given the benefit of h2o2, and this USA has more
of such low grade coal and oil shale than the good stuff. Therefore,
any and all amounts of h2o2 can be put to good use.
I'll further share as to whatever renewable energy that's in surplus
can just as easily become diverted into making the likes of LH2, LOx
and h2o2 (you pick), plus accommodating whatever fossil or biofuel
productions. You nice folks should also appreciate that we're
currently pillaging and raping mother Earth's oceans for a nifty tally
of extracting 100 million tonnes/year of seafood (that's not including
global sport and subsistence fishing), and since we've been
artificially polluting via our human soot saturated CO2, NOx and
various other nifty toxins and radioactive waste, as having created a
measurable global dimming fiasco, plus indirectly a good number of and
ever expanding volumes of those ocean dead zones getting warmer and
deeper by the year, whereas such I was wondering how much biofuel
could be obtained from extracting and processing a billion tonnes per
year worth of those nasty jellyfish that thrive within such ocean dead
zones.
There are a few other nifty advantages that I'll have to recall from
previous research and subsequent deductive notions, as based upon the
regular laws of physics and the best available science (including a
few of those our warm and fuzzy NASA has on the books), that by rights
should pan out in favor of what h2o2 plus a little fossil or whatever
biofuel can provide as our best liquid energy compromise (short of
those ET boat loads of methane from Titan, and some viable method of
subsequently exporting our sooty NOx and CO2 off-world).
- Brad Guth -
