J
John Fields
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
You miss a crucial point, though: They didn't say bumblebee flight was
impossible, they said that their *model* of bumblebee flight said it was
impossible. All this meant was that contemporary aerodynamic theory was
inadequate to explain it, and scientists understood that. Faced with
overwhelming evidence that bumblebees can, in fact, fly, no scientist
seriously claimed that they cannot, only that scientists were at a loss
to explain it. See:
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040911/mathtrek.asp
The most relevant paragraph in the piece is:
"The persistence of the bumblebee myth also highlights a
misunderstanding about science, models, and mathematics. The real issue
isn't that scientists can be wrong. The real issue is that there's a
crucial difference between a 'thing' and a mathematical model of the
'thing.'"
---
Yes, of course.
Since bumblebees _do_ fly, it's obviously impossible for them not
to, and the reference to their not being able to was sarcasm.
My quarrel was with Graham and his claim that it was a myth, when
clearly what was stated by Magnan was that if... then bees couldn't
fly, a reference which Graham either chose not to include or was
oblivious of. I vote for the latter.