AN920 Posted April 9, 2007 Report Share Posted April 9, 2007 It appears that a lot of members are interested in building simple square wave inverters from diagrams on this forum. Problems with these designs are that the drive wave to the push pull transistors or fets does not have any dead-time or duty-cycle control. Dead time makes sure one side is turned off before the other side turn on. This is important when operating near maximum duty cycle. Also by varying the duty we can to some extent control the final output voltage of the inverter as this is set by : Vin x transformer ratio x duty (or on time)My design provides the frequency as well as the duty cycle to be set using standard CMOS parts. R2 set the output frequency from about 45-65Hz. R1 can set the duty cycle between about 5-95% although it will never be used that low. The added advantage is that with this control circuit you can now use a transformer with lower primary voltages like 6+6 or 9+9 while still using the standard 12V source. The correct Vsec is maintained by adjusting the on time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audioguru Posted April 9, 2007 Report Share Posted April 9, 2007 Hi AN920,That is nice. ;DMaybe a FET or some other voltage controlled resistance can act as a voltage regulator to replace the R2 pot to keep the average output voltage up as the inverter is loaded down, and to keep the average voltage down if the load is removed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AN920 Posted April 9, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2007 Many ways. You can also use a small AC transformer as feedback, monitor the rectified DC and together with a opto LDR adjust R1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AN920 Posted April 12, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2007 If we take the same circuit and add some injection locking it is possible to have crystal accurate frequency drive while retaining duty cycle control. In the circuit use a 1.6384 MHz crystal and leave out U3B for 50 Hz. Use a 3.932 MHz crystal with U3B for 60Hz operation. Both these crystals are available commercially. You may also modify the divider ratios to accommodate other crystal values.C4 as 10nF seems to give reliable locking but you may experiment with this value. This value locked quickly and stable in simulations. This value can be increased slightly if needed. For initial adjustment you must set the frequency control slightly faster (with J1 open) than the frequency that you are locking to by a few Hz.Last picture shows the locking process.Top trace shows incoming 100 Hz reference to be locked against2nd trace shows the charging cycle of the 47nF timing cap3rd, 4th trace shows the drive outputsUp to marker 1 it is clear that there's no sync between output pulses and incoming reference. Output frequency is high at about 63 Hz. After marker 1 the reference is connected to the 10nF cap and after a few cycles the osc is locked against the ref as shown by the edges lining up at marker 2. Output frequency after this point is now 50 HzSmall demo video Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.