[Mainlander]

Most are not covered, plus most here have posted Facts that the open the PSU
to replace the Fan..

I don'r remember anyone doing this.

Show me a modern computer that has external 230V contacts outside the
power supply case.

That mean bugger all, all gobblegook, they remove the screws to replace the
Fan..

If you do then certification is required. If you don't then certification
is not required.

I have never over many years of working with PCs, had occasion in my work
to replace a power supply fan. I did this once on one of my home
computers, this is exempt because I owned it.

I would say that replacement of a PSU fan is not a routine service
procedure for a PC. It is far simpler to replace the whole PSU.

 

[Mainlander]

It's *my* certificate - I'll do what I like with it, so long as nobody is
abused or defamed.

The design and some symbols / logos that are undoubtedly copyrighted to
Tai Poutini Polytech.

 

[Mainlander]

Ass they have a external Main switch and people here have stated that they do
replace the Fan, never ever seen a sealed one yet..

They are all trying to cover up that they have no permit to work on them at
all.

Modern PCs use ATX power supplies, that do not have external mains
switches, it's only if you choose to open the power supply case that a
certificate is needed, people who work on PCs without opening the power
supply case DO NOT NEED REGISTRATION.

 

[Rod Speed]

[email protected] says...

Not a clue. As always.

The design and some symbols / logos that are
undoubtedly copyrighted to Tai Poutini Polytech.

Completely irrelevant to whether you are welcome to scan
your certificate and post it on your web site or wherever.

 

[Rod Speed]

It doesn't remain on the webserver when my browser downloads it to my
local hard disk, does it?

Completely irrelevant. Your browser does that with
any web site that has copyrighted logos on it etc.

That is NOT an infringement of copyright.

 

[Rod Speed]

So you are trying to coverup that you do not have any registration,

I dont need one at all, I'm not stupid enough to even be in sheep-raper-land at all.

most posters here have stated that they open them up to replace the Fan..

Hardly anyone replaces fans commercially. It just aint economic.
Basically its a lot cheaper to pay an asian to make you a whole
new power supply than to pay a tech in a first world country
first world country wages to replace the fan.

 

[Uncle StoatWarbler]

I suggest that you stop referring to Australia like that.

Australians prefer wombats. They can't run as fast as sheep do, so even
Rod Speed has no trouble humping one.

 

[KS]

It seems that posters here can insult Woger and slander him and he

should lye down an take it all.?
I am sorry but you are completely wrong.

Pathetic. Really pathetic Woger.

 

[Mainlander]

Not a clue. As always.



Completely irrelevant to whether you are welcome to scan
your certificate and post it on your web site or wherever.

If someone else holds the copyright, you can't publish the document
without their permission. it is completely RELEVANT.

 

[Mainlander]

How do you search for, "or whoever he claims to be".


You will find that hardly any of the Posters here that Fix computers and other
stuff have any formal training, let alone Electrical Registration.

Now now Roger, as we pointed out to one of your other multiple
personalities a little way back, electrical registration is not required
to work on modern PCs that have a fully enclosed power supply.

 

[Mainlander]

Can you post this fact that he has made this statement.?

Why are you referring to yourself in third person, Rodger?

 

[Lennier]

Australians prefer wombats. They can't run as fast as sheep do, so even
Rod Speed has no trouble humping one.

<snigga>

Nice!


Lennier

 

[Rod Speed]

Rod Speed [email protected] wrote

If someone else holds the copyright, you can't
publish the document without their permission.

That type of use doesnt constitute a copyright infringement.

it is completely RELEVANT.

Fraid not.

 

[Mainlander]

That type of use doesnt constitute a copyright infringement.

It does in NZ.

 

[~misfit~]

That is not true at all he gives back what he gets so please take the
blinkers off.

It seems that posters here can insult Woger and slander him and he
should lye down an take it all.?


I am sorry but you are completely wrong.

Plonk woger.

 

[KS]

That type of use doesnt constitute a copyright infringement.

It does in NZ.

Bzzt ! Only the logos that were designed for the company had exclusive
rights attatched to them.

Seeing that the logo was for the Tai Poutini Polytech, and the Polytech has
chosen to publish these logos in the public domain, showing people these
published logos would not be a breech of copyright.

Tai Poutini Polytech has given Lennier a certificate, on which is a supposed
copyright logo. This certificate is, by design, to be shown in the public
arena (public domain). Reproducing the entire document is NOT a breech of
copyright.

Showing a logo that is already published in the public domain is not a
breech as such, but reproducing them and passing them off as your own work
is.

Where would the media be if they couldn't show logos in the newspaper, tv,
magazines ?

It's a common misconception that holding copyright forbids other public
display.

 

[Rod Speed]

It does in NZ.

Pigs arse it does.

 

[Rod Speed]

Bzzt ! Only the logos that were designed for the
company had exclusive rights attatched to them.

And they dont get to prevent the display of an individual's
certificate on his web site, even in sheep-raper-land.

Seeing that the logo was for the Tai Poutini Polytech,
and the Polytech has chosen to publish these logos
in the public domain, showing people these published
logos would not be a breech of copyright.

And it wouldnt be a breach of copyright even if they hadnt done that.

Tai Poutini Polytech has given Lennier a certificate, on
which is a supposed copyright logo. This certificate is,
by design, to be shown in the public arena (public domain).

Thats not what public domain means.

Reproducing the entire document is NOT a breech of copyright.

Indeed, when its got an individual's name on it etc.

Showing a logo that is already published in
the public domain is not a breech as such,

Thats not what public domain means.

but reproducing them and passing them off as your own work is.
Indeed.

Where would the media be if they couldn't
show logos in the newspaper, tv, magazines ?

Indeed. Any street shot would have some.

It's a common misconception that holding
copyright forbids other public display.

In spades with a certificate with your name on it.

 

[pete]

So you are trying to coverup that you do not have any registration,

most posters here have stated that they open them up to replace the Fan..

I was one of those who said that, but I'm allowed, 'cos I'm registered to
perform the following:
"Limited to the maintenance and replacement of electrical appliances and
fittings rated up to 460 volts including their disconnection from and
reconnection to fixed wiring"
Can you say that, Woger?

 

[Greg]

pete wrote:

Just check the web site that lists regestired people, no sign of a roger
(or woger) Sheppard